본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

정상교합자의 이마형태와 그에 따른 상악 전치의 위치 평가

An Evaluative Study on Forehead Morphology of Individuals with Normal Occlusion and Position of Maxillary Incisor in Accordance to Forehead Morphology

이진우|이상민|정동화|이수용|차경석
대한턱관절교합학회 (Korean academy of stomatognathic function and occlusion)|2013.09|구강회복응용과학지 (Journal of Dental Rehabilitation and Applied Science)|제29권 제3호|pp. 236-248

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

Position심미성Esthetics위치상악전치이마 형태Andrews 분석Andrew's analysisForehead morphologyMaxillary incisor
주제분류치의학

초록

본 연구는 정상 안모이면서 정상교합자인 37명을 대상으로 이마 형태를 분류한 후 분류 기준값을 찾아보았고이마 분류에 따른 상악 전치의 위치차이를 연구하였다. 또 이마형태에 영향을 주는 인자들과 상악 전치의 위치와의 상관관계를 조사하여 다음과 같은 결과를 얻었다. 1. 이마의 형태는 angular, round, straight, concave 형태로 구분 가능하다. 2. 이마의 형태를 분류할 수 있는 특정 기준 값은 존재하지 않았지만 S value와 이마길이(Tri-Gla)를 이용하여이마형태의 분류 가능성이 존재하였다. 3. 이마의 형태에 따른 상악 전치의 위치는 차이는 존재하지 않았다. 4. 이마 기울기와 Andrews 분석값은 유의한 음의 상관관계를 갖는다. 즉 이마 기울기가 커질수록 상악 전치는후방 위치하게 되며 다음과 같은 공식 Andrew analysis = -0.39*Forehead inclination으로 표현할 수 있다.

Abstract

In this study, 37 subjects with normal facial shape and normal occlusion are classified and reference value for such classification was investigated. Difference in position of maxillary incisor was studied according to the cl assification. Moreover, by investigating correlation between factors affecting forehead morphology and positio n of maxillary incisor,following results have been obtained. 1. Morphology of forehead can be classified as angular type, round type, straight type, and concave type. 2. There were no specific reference value for evaluation of forehead morphology but possibilities of evaluating forehead morphology using S value and forehead length (Tri-Gla) still remain. 3. There were no correlation between forehead morphology and position of maxillary incisor. 4. Forehead inclination and Andrew analysis show statistically significant negative correlation. That is, as forehead inclination increases, maxillary incisor is positioned posteriorly and this relationship can be shown as following equation,Andrew analysis = -0.39*Forehead inclination.

참고문헌 (43)

  1. Dorsey J, "Social and psychological motivations for orthodontic treatment", Am J Orthod, 72, pp.460~ (1977)
  2. Kilpelainen PV, "Anterior tooth position and motivation for early treatment", Angle Orthod, 63, pp.171~174 (1993)
  3. McKiernan EX, "Psychological profiles and motives of adults seeking orthodontic treatment", Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg, 7, pp.187~198 (1992)
  4. Andrews WA, "AP relationship of the maxillary central incisors to the forehead in adult white females", Angle Orthod, 78, pp.662~669 (2008)
  5. Downs WB, "Variations in facial relationships; their significance in treatment and prognosis", Am J Orthod, 34, pp.812~840 (1948)
  6. Downs WB, "The role of cephalometrics in orthodontic case analysis and diagnosis", Am J Orthod, 38, pp.162~168 (1952)
  7. Downs WB, "Variations in facial proportions. important factors in their management and prognoses", Inf Orthod Kieferorthop, 2, pp.5~22 (1970)
  8. Steiner CC, "Cephalometrics for you and me", Am J Orthod, 39, pp.729~755 (1953)
  9. Steiner CC, "Cephalometrics in clinical practice", Angle Orthod, 29, pp.8~29 (2012)
  10. Tabbenor O, "Essentials of orthognathic surgery, 2nd edition", Br Dent J, 210, pp.495~496 (2011)
  11. Burstone CJ, "The integumental profile", Am J Orthod, 44, pp.1~25 (1958)
  12. Burstone CJ, "Lip posture and its significance in treatment planning", Am J Orthod, 53, pp.262~284 (1967)
  13. Vig R, "The kinetics of anterior tooth display", J Prosthet Dent, 39, pp.502~504 (1978)
  14. McNamara Jr, "A method of cephalometric evaluation", Am J Orthod, 86, pp.449~446 (1984)
  15. "Orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics", International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, 5, pp.229~234 (2010)
  16. Baumrind S, "The reliability of head film measurements: 1. landmark identification", Am J Orthod, 60, pp.111~127 (1971)
  17. Baumrind S, "The reliability of head film measurements: 2. conventional angular and linear measures", Am J Orthod, 60, pp.505~517 (1971)
  18. Kvam E, "Variability in tracings pf lateral head plates for diagnostic orthodontic purposes. A methodologic study", Acta Odontol Scan, 27, pp.359~356 (2012)
  19. Sandler PJ, "Reproducibility of cephalometric measurements", Journal of Orthodontics, 15, pp.105~110 (1988)
  20. Tourne LP, "A validity test of cephalometric variables as a measure of clinical applicability in anteroposterior profile assessment", Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg, 8, pp.95~112 (1993)
  21. Cox NH, "Facial harmony", Am J Orthod, 60, pp.175~183 (1971)
  22. Tulloch C, "Cephalometric measures as indicators of facial attractiveness", Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg, 8, pp.171~179 (1993)
  23. Moss JP, "The use of threedimensional techniquesin facial esthetics", Semin Orthod, 1, pp.94~104 (1995)
  24. Hambleton RS, "The orthodontic curtain", Angle Orthod, 33, pp.294~298 (2012)
  25. Hambleton RS, "The soft-tissue covering of the skeletal face as related to orthodontic problems", Am J Orthod, 50, pp.405~420 (1964)
  26. Merrifield LL, "The profile line as an aid in critically evaluating facial esthetics", Am J Orthod, 52, pp.804~822 (1966)
  27. Farkas LG, "Anthropometric proportions in the upper lip-lower lip-chin area of the lower face in young white adults", Am J Orthod, 86, pp.52~60 (1984)
  28. Arnett GW, "Facial keys to orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. part I", American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 103, pp.299~312 (1993)
  29. William Arnett G, "Facial keys to orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning - part II", American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 103, pp.395~411 (1993)
  30. Bergman RT, "Cephalometric soft tissue facial analysis", American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 116, pp.373~389 (1999)
  31. The six element of orofacial harmony, "Adrews LF", Foundation for orthodontic education and research, ~ (1999)
  32. Moss ML, "The primary role of functional matrices in facial growth", Am J Orthod, 55, pp.566~577 (1969)
  33. Friede H, "Normal development and growth of the human neurocranium and cranial base", Scand J Plast Surg Recontr Surg Hand Surg, 15, pp.163~169 (2012)
  34. Lieberman DE, "Basicranial influence on overall cranial shape", J Hum Evol, 38, pp.291~315 (2000)
  35. Moss ML, "The primary role of functional matrices in facial growth", Am J Orthod, 55, pp.566~577 (1969)
  36. Friede H, "Normal development and growth of the human neurocranium and cranial base", Scand J Plast Surg Recontr Surg Hand Surg, 15, pp.163~169 (2012)
  37. Lieberman DE, "Basicranial influence on overall cranial shape", J Hum Evol, 38, pp.291~315 (2000)
  38. Farkas LG, , J Plastic and Reconstruction surgery, 75, pp.509~ (1985)
  39. Proffit WR, "Contemporay treatment of dentofacial deformity" (2003), mosby press
  40. The study on ideal position of upper incisor based on head in normal occlusion, "Lee SY", Dankook university, ~ (2000)
  41. Riedel RA, "The relation of maxillary structures to cranium in malocclusion and in normal occlusion", Angle Orthod, pp.141~145 (1952)
  42. Shudy FF, "Cant 0f the occlusal plane and axial inclinationof teeth", Angle Orthod, 33, pp.69~82 (1963)
  43. Ricketts RM, "A foundation for cephalometric communications", Am. J. Orthod, 46, pp.330~357 (1960)

관련 논문AI추천

한국 유치악 성인의 상악 중절치 위치 및 견치간 거리에 관한 연구박상원, 반재삼, 양동헌, 오계정, 이지윤대한치과보철학회 · 대한치과보철학회지2013 · 제51권 제3호Evaluation of the relationship between upper incisor exposure and cephalometric variables in Korean young adults강경화, 김상철, 장나영, 조진형, 채종문, Eon-Hwa Lee, Sung-Hoon Han대한치과교정학회 · 대한치과교정학회지2013 · 제43권 제5호전후방적 악골 관계에 따른 치아치조성 보상작용에 관한 연구심혜영, 장영일대한치과교정학회 · 대한치과교정학회지2004 · 제34권 제5호Quantitative analysis of the morphology of the lips according to different anteroposterior and vertical skeletal patterns김재준, 장인산, 차봉근, 최동순대한치과의사협회 · 대한치과의사협회지2023 · 제61권 제3호푸리에급수를이용한사람위이틀활의분석신제원, 주성숙, 쿠마베지, 나카츠카미치코, 이와이야스토모, 쯔지바야시토오루대한체질인류학회 · 해부·생물인류학2008 · 제21권 제2호한국인 정상교합자의 하악 치열궁 형태국윤아, 김성훈, 김정기, 모성서, 윤영국, 차경석, 태기출대한치과교정학회 · 대한치과교정학회지2004 · 제34권 제6호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)

치과 임플란트에서 기성 지대주와 맞춤형 지대주의 응력분석 및 피로파절에 관한 연구김희은, 조인호pp. 209-223나사유지형 임플란트 고정성 보철물의 적합도와 캔틸레버가 지지골조직의 응력분산에 미치는 영향김태영, 조혜원, 이재인pp. 224-235파노라마방사선사진에서 환자의 머리 위치가 하악 수직, 수평 확대율에 미치는 영향 : 전후방 및 좌우 이동이영균, 김용건, 안서영pp. 249-2582종의 임플란트 내부결합구조체에 따른 치조골상 유한요소응력 분석김성량, 이창희, 변욱, 한인혜, 정다운pp. 259-271임플란트 식립 후 초기 안정성의 변화조리라, 김대곤, 박찬진pp. 272-279
원문 보기