본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

A Cognitive Grammar Approach to the Antipassive Construction in English

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

As a grammatical category, the antipassive in English is often seen in the discourse but has not been widely studied in contrast to the passive. For one thing, the construction used to be regarded as being exclusive to ergative-absolutive languages. For another, the binary voice division in many traditional grammar books has precluded ESL and EFL learners from being exposed to fine-grained classification of voice construction. Given this, this paper aims to address the English antipassive construction from the perspective of cognitive grammar. It is argued that the antipassive has discrete features and is not confined to one single construction; instead, several constructions instantiate the antipassive in at least five ways: (i) object deletion or suppression, (ii) conative construction or preposition drop alternation, (iii) object incorporation, (iv) plural, indefinite, or non-referring objects, and (v) non-fact modalities. In terms of the prototypicality of the construction, type (i), type (ii), and type (iii) are more typical antipassives as they involve a shift of transitivity. In terms of continuous features, type (iv) and type (v) can be taken as non-typical antipassives or overlaps with the active in that they only exhibit the characteristics of the antipassive semantically. Thus, it is reasonable to say that both the active and antipassive are counterparts of the passive.

Abstract

As a grammatical category, the antipassive in English is often seen in the discourse but has not been widely studied in contrast to the passive. For one thing, the construction used to be regarded as being exclusive to ergative-absolutive languages. For another, the binary voice division in many traditional grammar books has precluded ESL and EFL learners from being exposed to fine-grained classification of voice construction. Given this, this paper aims to address the English antipassive construction from the perspective of cognitive grammar. It is argued that the antipassive has discrete features and is not confined to one single construction; instead, several constructions instantiate the antipassive in at least five ways: (i) object deletion or suppression, (ii) conative construction or preposition drop alternation, (iii) object incorporation, (iv) plural, indefinite, or non-referring objects, and (v) non-fact modalities. In terms of the prototypicality of the construction, type (i), type (ii), and type (iii) are more typical antipassives as they involve a shift of transitivity. In terms of continuous features, type (iv) and type (v) can be taken as non-typical antipassives or overlaps with the active in that they only exhibit the characteristics of the antipassive semantically. Thus, it is reasonable to say that both the active and antipassive are counterparts of the passive.

참고문헌 (39)

  1. Blight, R., "Head Movement, Passive, and Antipassive in English", 박사, pp.2004
  2. Cooreman, A, "Voice: Form and Function", pp.49~88 (1994), Benjamins
  3. Dixon, R., "Ergativity" (1994), Cambridge University Press
  4. Dixon, R., "Changing Valency: Case Studies in Transitivity", pp.1~29 (2000), Cambridge University Press
  5. Foley, W., "Functional Syntax and Universal Grammar" (1984), Cambridge University Press
  6. Givón, T., "Syntax: A Functional-Typological Introduction (Vol. I)" (1984), John Benjamins
  7. Givón, T., "English Grammar A Function-Based Introduction (Vol. II)" (1993), John Benjamins
  8. Givón, T., "Voice and Inversion" (1994), John Benjamins
  9. Givón, T., "Syntax: An Introduction (Vol. II)" (2001), John Benjamins
  10. Guerrero, M, "Morpho-Syntactic Alternations in English:Functional and Cognitive Perspectives", pp.182~206 (2011), Equinox
  11. Heath, J, "Antipassivization : A Functional Typology", Berkeley Linguistics Society, 2, pp.202~211 (1976)
  12. Heaton, R., "A Typology of Antipassives, with Special Reference to Mayan", 박사, pp.2017
  13. Heaton, R., "A Featural Description of Antipassive-type Structures", Paper Presented at the 12th Conference of the Association for Linguistic Typology (ALT) (2017)
  14. Heaton, R, "Antipassives in Crosslinguistic Perspective", Annual Review of Linguistics, 6, pp.131~153 (2020)
  15. Hopper, P., "Transitivity in Grammar and Discourse", Language, 56, pp.251~299 (1980)
  16. Langacker, R., "Foundations of Cognitive Grammar I: Theoretical Prerequisites" (1987), Stanford University Press
  17. Langacker, R., "Concept, Image and Symbol: The Cognitive Basis of Grammar" (1991), Mouton de Gruyter
  18. Langacker, R., "Grammar and Conceptualization" (2000), Mouton de Gruyter
  19. Langacker, R., "On the Continuous Debate about Discreteness", Cognitive Linguistics, 17(1), pp.107~151 (2006)
  20. Langacker, R., "The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics", pp.421~462 (2007), Oxford University Press
  21. Langacker, R., "Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction" (2008), Oxford University Press
  22. Lazard, G., "Transitivity Revisited as an Example of a More Strict Approach in Typological Research", Folia Linguist, 36, pp.141~190 (1993)
  23. Levin, B., "English Verb Classes and Alternations: a Preliminary Investigation" (1993), University of Chicago Press
  24. Li, J. Y., "A Cognitive Grammar Approach to the Fuzziness in the English Voice Category", 박사, pp.2020
  25. Löbner, S., "Understanding Semantics" (2013), Routledge
  26. Malchukov, A., "Valency Classes in the World’s Languages" (2015), Mouton de Gruyter
  27. Palmer, F., "Grammatical Roles and Relations" (1994), Cambridge University Press
  28. Payne, J., "Describing Morphosyntax: A Guide for Field Linguistics" (1997), Cambridge University Press
  29. Polinsky, M., "The Oxford Handbook of Ergativity", pp.308~331 (2017), Oxford University Press
  30. Postal, P., "Antipassive in French", Lingvisticae Investigationes, 1, pp.333~374 (1977)
  31. Spreng B., "Ergativity: Emerging Issues", pp.247~270 (2006), Springer
  32. Spreng B., "On the Conditions for Antipassives", Language and Linguistics Compass, 4, pp.556~575 (2010)
  33. Taylor, J., "Linguistic Categorization: Prototypes in Linguistic Theory" (1989), Clarendon Press
  34. Taylor, J., "Cognitive Grammar" (2002), Oxford University Press
  35. Trask, R., "A Dictionary of Grammatical Terms in Linguistics" (1993), Routledge
  36. Ungerer, E., "An Introduction to Cognitive Linguistics" (1996), Longman
  37. Vigus, M., "A Radical Construction Grammar Analysis of Antipassive Constructions", 석사, pp.2016
  38. Talmy, L., "Towards Cognitive Semantics Vol. 1: Concept Structuring System" (2000), The MIT Press
  39. Talmy, L., "Toward a Cognitive Semantics Vo1. 2: Typology and Process in Concept Structuring" (2000), The MIT Press

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (18건)