심악선생의 <혁신국어학사>로 본 한글 창제 -고대인도 음성학의 영향을 중심으로-
The Creation of Hangul and Sung-nyeong Lee’s An Innovative History of Korean Linguistics: Focusing on the Influence of Ancient Indian Phonetics
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This article aims to demonstrate that Hangul was created using scientific principles based on Ancient Indian phonetic theories. There is no denying that King Sejong referred to Classical Chinese phonology and the Mongolian Phags-pa script at an early stage of the invention process. At a later stage, however, Hangul began to be more refined with reference to Ancient Indian phonetics; Shinmi, the Buddhist monk, aided this process. Incorporating those theories eventually led to the invention of a writing system that finely reflects the Korean sounds' place and manner of articulation. It is stressed that the creation of Hangul was not achieved out of thin air solely from Sejong's ingenuity. Rather, as argued by Chung (2015), Hangul is the fruitful outcome of a series of laborious tasks of examining and analyzing other scripts used in Asian languages, coupled with meticulous analyses of extant linguistic theories developed in China and India. This article provides several pieces of evidence to support the aforementioned claims by highlighting the role of the phonetic theories adopted from Ancient India for the invention of Hangul, thereby strengthening Chung's (2015) arguments.
Abstract
This article aims to demonstrate that Hangul was created using scientific principles based on Ancient Indian phonetic theories. There is no denying that King Sejong referred to Classical Chinese phonology and the Mongolian Phags-pa script at an early stage of the invention process. At a later stage, however, Hangul began to be more refined with reference to Ancient Indian phonetics; Shinmi, the Buddhist monk, aided this process. Incorporating those theories eventually led to the invention of a writing system that finely reflects the Korean sounds' place and manner of articulation. It is stressed that the creation of Hangul was not achieved out of thin air solely from Sejong's ingenuity. Rather, as argued by Chung (2015), Hangul is the fruitful outcome of a series of laborious tasks of examining and analyzing other scripts used in Asian languages, coupled with meticulous analyses of extant linguistic theories developed in China and India. This article provides several pieces of evidence to support the aforementioned claims by highlighting the role of the phonetic theories adopted from Ancient India for the invention of Hangul, thereby strengthening Chung's (2015) arguments.
참고문헌 (121)
- 경원, "불복장의 비밀" (2018), 민족사
- 김민수, "全訂版 신국어학사" (1990), 一潮閣
- 김완진, "음운과 문자" (1996), 신구문화사
- 이기문, "국어음운론" (1984), 학연사
- 李能和, "朝鮮佛敎通史, 上中下 3권 2책" (1968), 新文館
- 이숭녕, "혁신 국어학사" (1976), 박영사
- 이숭녕, "世宗大王의 學問과 思想" (1981), 亞細亞文化社
- 이숭녕, "信眉의 譯經事業에 關한 硏究", 대한민국 學術院論文集(人文社會科學篇), 25, pp.1~42 (1986)
- 이태승, "悉曇字記와 望月寺本 眞言集 硏究" (2004), 글익는들
- 임근동, "고려대장경의 실담문자 - 瑜伽金剛頂經釋字母品의 문자 배열과 음운을 중심으로-", 훈민정음 창제에 대한 새로운 관점, pp.165~204 (2022)
- 정광, "빌렘 마테지우스의 機能構造言語學" (1983), 덕성어문학
- 정광, "문법과 텍스트 (고영근선생 정년기념논문집)", pp.31~46 (2002), 서울대학교 출판부
- 정광, "훈민정음의 中聲과 파스파 문자의 모음자", 國語學, (56), pp.221~248 (2009), 국어학회[DOI]
- 정광, "訓民正音の字形の獨創性-- 『蒙古字韻』のパスパ文字との比較を通して--", 朝鮮學報, 211, pp.41~86 (2009), 朝鮮學會
- 정광, "훈민정음 초성 31자와 파스파자 32 자모", 譯學과 譯學書, (2), pp.97~140 (2011), 譯學書學會
- 정광, "<蒙古字韻>喩母のパスパ母音字と訓民正音の中声"", 東京大學言語學論集, (31), pp.1~20 (2011), 東京大學 言語學科
- 정광, "<몽고자운>의 파스파 韻尾字와 훈민정음의 終聲", 譯學과 譯學書, (3), pp.5~34 (2012), 譯學書學會
- 정광, "고려본 <용감수경(龍龕手鏡)>에 대하여", 국어국문학, (161), pp.237~279 (2012), 국어국문학회[DOI]
- 정광, "毘伽羅論과 훈민정음 -파니니의 <八章>과 佛家의 聲明記論을 중심으로-", 한국어사 연구, (2), pp.113~179 (2016), 국어사연구회
- 정광, "反切考 - 「諺文字母」 “俗所謂 反切” 27자의 解明을 위하여-", 어문논집, (81), pp.127~186 (2017), 민족어문학회
- 정광, "反切考 - 「俗所謂反切二十七字」を解明するために -", 中國語學 開篇, 36, pp.23~48 (2018), 好文出版
- 정광, "“反切考 - 理解 ‘俗所謂反切二十七字-", 國際漢學, 外語敎學與硏究出版社, 北京, 2018년, pp.83~102 (2018), 外語敎學與硏究出版社
- 정광, "파스파 문자의 喩母와 훈민정음의 欲母-왜 한글에서는 모음자에", ㅇ, 국제고려학(International Journal of Korean Studies), pp.2018, (17)[DOI]
- 정광, "신미대사와 훈민정음", 한국어사 연구, (5), pp.135~196 (2019), 국어사연구회
- 정광, "한글과 梵字", 國語學, (96), pp.59~107 (2020), 국어학회[DOI]
- 정광, "ハングルとパスパ文字", pp.77~89 (2021)
- 정광, "중국 북방민족의 표음문자 제정과 훈민정음 －한글 제정의 배경을 중심으로－", 한국어사 연구, (7) (2022), 국어사연구회
- 정광, "몽고자운 연구" (2009), 박문사
- 정광, "蒙古字韻" (2013), 民族出版社
- 정광, "蒙古字韻硏究" (2015), 大倉출판사
- 정광, "훈민정음과 파스파 문자" (2012), 도서출판 역락
- 정광, "조선시대의 외국어 교육" (2014), 김영사
- 정광, "한글의 발명" (2015), 김영사
- 정광, "역학서의 세계~조선 사역원의 외국어 교재 연구~" (2017), 박문사
- 정광, "증정 훈민정음의 사람들" (2019), 박문사
- 정광, "동아시아 여러 문자와 한글" (2019), 지식산업사
- 정광, "언어학사로 본 20세기까지의 한국어 연구사" (2022), 박문사
- 干瀉龍祥, "梵文古寫經雜報", 哲學年譜, 2 (1920), 九州大學
- 岡敎 邃, "朝鮮華藏寺の梵夾と印度指空三藏法", 宗敎硏究, pp.3~5 (1910)
- 金文京, "日韓訓讀史の比較-その共通點と相違點-", 麗澤大學 第3回 「日韓訓讀ジンポジウム」 (2011)
- 河野六郞, "言語學 大辭典 上·中·下" (1989), 三省堂
- 河野六郞, "言語學 大辭典 別卷 世界文字辭典" (2001), 三省堂
- 白鳥庫吉, "諺文", 史學雜誌, 8(1) (1897)
- 荻原雲來, "實習梵語學" (1915), 明治書院
- 田久保周譽, "批判悉曇學" (1944), 平河出版社
- 田久保周譽, "梵字 悉曇" (1981), 平河出版社
- 西田龍雄, "西夏語の硏究-西夏語の再構成と西夏文字の解讀 I.II" (1964), 座右寶刊行會
- 西田龍雄, "西夏語韻圖<五音切韻>の硏究 상·중·하", 京都大學文學部硏究紀要, (20~22) (1981)
- 西田龍雄, "西夏王國の言語と文化" (1997), 岩波書店
- 西田龍雄, "西夏語硏究新論" (1998), 古稀記念會
- 服部四郞, "元朝秘史の蒙古語を表はす漢字の硏究" (1946), 龍文書局
- 服部四郞, "日本語と琉球語, 朝鮮語, アルタイ語との親族關係", 民族學硏究, 13(2) (1948)
- 服部四郞, "パクパ字(八思巴字)について ~ 特にeの字とėの字に関して ~(一) On the ḥPhags~pa script ~ Especially Concerning the letters e and ė ~(I)", ~ (1984)
- 服部四郞, "パクパ字(八思巴字)について ~特にeの字とėの字に関して~ (二) On the ḥPhags~pa script ~ Especially Concerning the letters e and ė ~(II)", ~ (1984)
- 服部四郞, "パクパ字(八思巴字)について ~再論~ On the ḥPhags~pa script ~ the Second Remarks ~", ~ (1984)
- 服部四郞, "元朝秘史蒙古語の", o, ö, pp.に終わる音節を表わす漢字のシナ語音の簡略ローマ字轉寫, The Broad Roman Transcription of the Chinese Sounds of the Chinese Characters Representing the Mongolian Syllables Ending in ~o in the Yüan~ch'ao Mi~shih[DOI]
- 服部四郞, "服部四郞論文集, 卷3" (1993), 三省堂
- 服部四郞 編, "ロマ~ン․ヤ~コブソン選集 2" (1978), 大修館書店
- 福井久藏, "以呂波字考錄" (1939)
- 藤塚 鄰, "高麗版龍龕手鏡" (1929), 京城帝國大學法文學部
- 藤本幸夫, "中國佛敎石經の硏究" (1996), 京都大學學術出版會
- 藤本幸夫, "龍龕手鏡(鑑)硏究" (2015), 麗澤大學出版會
- 馬淵和夫, "日本韻學史の硏究 I~III" (1962), 日本學術振興會
- 山口瑞鳳, "『三十頌』と『性入法 』の成立時期をめぐって", 東洋學報, (57) (1976)
- 金光平, "女眞語言文字硏究" (1980), 文物出版社
- 羅常培, "漢語音韻學導論" (1965), 太平書局
- 羅常培·蔡美彪, "八思巴文字與元代漢語" (1959), 科學出版社
- 寧忌浮, "蒙古字韻校勘補遺", 內蒙古大學學報, pp.9~16 (1992)
- 寧忌浮, "『蒙古字韻』與 『平水韻』", 語言硏究, pp.128~132 (1994)
- 董同龢, "漢語音韻學" (1968), 文史哲出版社
- 董同龢, "漢語音韻學" (1975), 汎學圖書
- 董同龢, "上古音韻表稿 第18本 第1分冊" (1969), 國立中央硏究院歷史語言硏究所
- 董同龢, "中國語音史" (1979), 華岡出版有限公司
- 潘重規, "龍龕手鑑新編" (1988), 中華書局
- 蘇振申, "中國歷史圖說, (一 ) 先史時代" (1980), 新新文化出版社有限公司
- 林燾, "中国语文", pp.161~169 (1987), 中国语文杂志社
- 鄭再發, "蒙古字韻跟跟八思巴字有關的韻書" (1965), 臺灣大學文學院文史叢刊之十五
- 鄭賢章, "龍龕手鏡硏究" (2004), 湖南師範大學出版會
- 照那斯图, "八思巴字硏究", 中國民族古文字硏究, pp.374~392 (1984), 中國民族古文字硏究會
- 照那斯图, "蒙古字韻校本" (1987), 民族出版社
- 周法高, "漢字古今音彙" (1973), 香港 中文大学
- 周有光, "漢字文化圈的文字演變", 民族語文, (1), pp.37~55 (1989), 民族硏究所
- 陳慶英, "漢文'西藏'一詞的來歷簡說", 燕京學報, (6), pp.129~139 (1999), 燕京硏究院, 北京大學出版
- 陳乃雄, "西田龍雄還曆記念東アジアの言語と歷史" (1988), 松香堂
- 陳垣, "史諱挙例", 燕京大學 燕京學報, (4), pp.537~652 (1928), 燕京大學燕京學報編輯委員會
- 陳垣, "史諱挙例", 燕京學報, (4), pp.537~651 (1928), 燕京大學燕京學報編輯會
- 陳垣, "中國現代學術經典·陳垣卷" (1996), 河北敎育出版社
- 淸格爾泰, "아시아 諸民族의 文字" (1997), 태학사
- 淸格爾泰, "契丹小字硏究" (1985), 中國社會科學出版社
- 洪金富, "元代蒙古語文的敎與學" (1990), 蒙藏委員會
- 黃征, "敦煌俗字典" (2005), 上海敎育出版社
- Abel-Rémusat, "Jean Pierre Abel-Rémusat: Recherches sur les langues tatars, Paris", ~ (1820)
- Chamberlain, Basil H., "On two questions on Japanese archaeology", The Journal of Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland, (New Series), XV(Part III) (1883)
- Noam Chomsky, "Sound Patterns of English" (1968), Harper & Row
- Peter T. Daniels, "Fundamentals of Grammatology", Journal of American Oriental Society, (110), pp.727~730 (1990)
- P. Andreas Eckardt, "Der Ursprung der Koreanischen Schrift", Mitteilungen der deutschen Gesellschaft für Natur und Völkerkunde Ostasiens, Band XXII, Teil c, ~ (1928)
- Joseph Edkins, "Korean writing", The Korean Repository, III, ~ (1898)
- G. von der Gabelentz, "Zur Beurtheilung des Koreanischen Schrift und Lautwesens", Sitzungsberichte der Kӧniglich Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, ~ (1892)
- Herbert A. Giles, "A Chinese-English Dictionary" (1892)
- G. A. Grierson, "Linguistic Survey of India, Vol. 8" (1990)
- Homer B. Hulbert, "The Korean alphabet", The Korean Repository, III, ~ (1896)
- Hulbert, "Remarks on the Korean alphabet", The Korean Review II, ~ (1902)
- Hulbert, "The Hun-min Chong-eum", The Korean Review II, ~ (1903)
- G. Huth, "Geschichte des Buddhismus in der Mongolei: Mit einer Einleitung: Politische Geschichte der Mongolen, vol 2" (1896), Karl J. Trübner
- C. W. Kim, "Sojoums in Linguistics II", pp.721~734 (1988), Tower Press
- J. von Klaproth, "Abhandlung über die Sprache und Schrift der Uiguren, Berlin", ~ (1812)
- Klaproth, "Aperçu de l'origines des dioverses écitures de l'ancien monde, Paris", ~ (1832)
- Terrien de Lacouperie, "On the Corean, Ainu, and Fusang(扶桑) writings", T'oung pao, III, ~ (1892)
- Gari Ledyard, "The Korean language reform of 1446－The Origin, Background, and Early History of the Korean Alphabet", Ph. D, pp.1966
- Ledyard, "The international linguistic background of the correct sounds for the instruction of the people", 31~88 (1997)
- Ledyard, "The Korean language reform of 1446" (1998), 신구문화사
- Ledyard, "The Problem of the ‘Imitation of the Old Seal’", Hunmin Chŏng'ŭm and hPags~pa, International Workshop on Hunminjeongeum and hPags~pa script, pp.11~31 (2008)
- Nagawangthondup Narkyid, "The Origin of the Tibetan script", Contributions on Tibetan language, history, and culture, pp.207~220 (1981)
- G. Pauthier, "De l'alphabet de P'a-sse-pa", Journal Asiatique, 5(19), pp.1~47 (1862)
- Paul Pelliot, "Les systèmes d'écriture en usage chez les anciens Mongols", Asia Major, 2, pp.284~289 (1925)
- N. Poppe, "The Mongolian Monuments in h͎͎P’ags-pa Script" (1957), Otto Harrassowitz
- N. Poppe, "Introduction to Altaic Linguistics" (1965), Otto Harrassowitz
- A. M. Pozdneev, "Lekt︠s︡īi po istorīi mongolʹskoĭ literatury, vol. I-III" (1908), Tipo-lit. pri Vostochnom Instituti︠e
- R. H. Robins, "A Short History of Linguistics" (1997), Longman Linguistics Library
- Léon de Rosny, "Aperçu de la langue Coréenne", Journal Asiatique, 6(3) (1864)
- Isaac Taylor, "The alphabet" (1883)