본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

An Alternative Analysis of Syncope in English

1

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

This study provides an alternative analysis of English syncope occurring in post-stressed positions to improve syllable parsing and foot structure in English. In post-tonic syllables, two types of syncope occur: one is general syncope, where only a vowel in an unstressed vowel deletes, and the other is a variant syncope in which two unstressed vowels delete. Analyses on syncope so far have focused on syncope environments and the clusters to be formed after syncope. It has been argued that syncope occurs when consonant clusters formed after syncope show a rising sonority. This common factor has been the major argument in syncope. However, such a concept might be problematic in multiple-syllabled inputs where two variant syncope outputs are possible. To avoid such a problem in syncope, we need to limit the domain of syncope to a foot. Thus, if there are two feet and syncope occurs in the first trisyllabic left-headed foot, the vowels in the first and second syllables become the target of syncope. To distinguish a preferred syncope output from a secondarily favored output, we employ constraint reranking of Parse-σ/NoCoda and *Comp-Ons/Contig-Rt, which are not highly ranked in the analysis to explain the most common type of syncope and variant syncope outputs by using two combined constraint rankings in English.

Abstract

This study provides an alternative analysis of English syncope occurring in post-stressed positions to improve syllable parsing and foot structure in English. In post-tonic syllables, two types of syncope occur: one is general syncope, where only a vowel in an unstressed vowel deletes, and the other is a variant syncope in which two unstressed vowels delete. Analyses on syncope so far have focused on syncope environments and the clusters to be formed after syncope. It has been argued that syncope occurs when consonant clusters formed after syncope show a rising sonority. This common factor has been the major argument in syncope. However, such a concept might be problematic in multiple-syllabled inputs where two variant syncope outputs are possible. To avoid such a problem in syncope, we need to limit the domain of syncope to a foot. Thus, if there are two feet and syncope occurs in the first trisyllabic left-headed foot, the vowels in the first and second syllables become the target of syncope. To distinguish a preferred syncope output from a secondarily favored output, we employ constraint reranking of Parse-σ/NoCoda and *Comp-Ons/Contig-Rt, which are not highly ranked in the analysis to explain the most common type of syncope and variant syncope outputs by using two combined constraint rankings in English.

참고문헌 (25)

  1. Algeo, John, "Syncope in English", South Atlantic Modern Language Association, 39(4), pp.22~30 (1974)
  2. Balogné, Katalin, "Weak and semiweak phonological positions in English", Journal of English Studies, 9, pp.75~96 (2011)
  3. Burzio, Luigi, "Principles of English stress" (1994), Cambridge University Press
  4. Chung, Chin-Wan, "The relation between a segmental insertion and deletion in English : Some implications of English pronunciation", Studies on English Language & Literature, 32(1), pp.269~295 (2006)
  5. Clements, George. N, "Papers in Laboratory Phonology I: Between the grammar and physics of speech", pp.283~333 (1990), Cambridge University Press
  6. Stuart Davis, "Ambiguous Syllabification in English: Foot Structure and the Schwa Syncope Problem", 언어과학, 25(1), pp.315~330 (2018), 한국언어과학회[DOI]
  7. Foley, James, "Phonological distinctive features", Folia Linguistica, 4, pp.87~92 (1970)
  8. Fowler, Carol, "Timing control in speech production", pp.1977
  9. Hammond, Michael, "Optimality theory:An overview", pp.33~58 (1997), Blackwell Publishers Ltd
  10. Harris, John, "English sound structure" (1994), Blackwell Publishers
  11. Hooper, Joan, "Recent development in historical linguistics", pp.183~207 (1978), The Hague
  12. Kager, René, "Optimality theory" (1999), Cambridge University Press
  13. Kahn, Daniel, "Syllable-based generalizations in English phonology", pp.1976
  14. Lee, K. -S, "A note on syncope in English", Journal of Linguistic Studies, 7(2), pp.177~188 (2002)
  15. Faithfulness and reduplicative identity, "McCarthy, John", GLSA, 249~384, pp.University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers 18: Papers in Optimality Theory (1995)
  16. 박창범, "Gradient OCP Effects on Heterosyllabic Clusters in English Phonotactics", 영어영문학연구, 63(3), pp.207~225 (2021), 한국중앙영어영문학회[DOI]
  17. Pérez, Patricia, "Gradient sonority and harmonic foot repair in English syncope", Coyote Papers, 8, pp.118~142 (1992)
  18. Prince, Alan, "Optimality theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar", Ms, pp.1993
  19. Prince, Alan, "Optimality theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar" (2004), Blackwell Publishing Ltd
  20. 류나영, "Schwa deletion in the conversational speech of English: The role of linguistic factors", 언어연구, 30(2), pp.313~333 (2013), 언어정보연구소[DOI]
  21. Saussure, Ferdinande de, "Course in general linguistics(Trsl. : Wade Baskin)New York : Philosophical Library" (1959), Philosophical Library
  22. Selkirk, Elizabeth, "Language sound structure: Studies in phonology presented to Morris Halle by his teachers and students", pp.107~136 (1984), MIT Press
  23. 서홍원, "An Aspect of Schwa Deletion in English", 영어영문학연구, 41(4), pp.149~166 (2015), 대한영어영문학회[DOI]
  24. Spencer, Andrew, "Phonology" (1996), Blackwell Publishers Ltd
  25. Zwicky, A, "Linguistic change and generative theory", pp.275~301 (1972), Indiana University Press

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)