Foreign Bodies in the Urinary Bladder and Their Management: A Single-Centre Experience From North India
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: This study was performed to characterise the nature, clinical presentation, mode of insertion, and management of intravesical foreign bodies in patients treated at our hospital. Methods: Between January 2008 and December 2014, 49 patients were treated for intravesical foreign bodies at King George Medical University, Lucknow. All records of these patients were retrospectively analysed to characterise the nature of the foreign body, each patient’s clinical presentation, the mode of insertion, and how the case was managed. Results: A total of 49 foreign bodies were retrieved from patients’ urinary bladders during the study period. The patients ranged in age from 11 to 68 years. Thirty-three patients presented with complaints of haematuria (67.3%), 29 complained of frequency of urination and dysuria (59.1%), and 5 patients reported pelvic pain (10.2%). The circumstances of insertion were iatrogenic in 20 cases (40.8%), self-insertion in 17 cases (34.6%), sexual abuse in 4 cases (8.1%), migration from another organ in 4 cases (8.1%), and assault in 4 cases (8.1%). Of the foreign bodies, 33 (67.3%) were retrieved by cystoscopy, while transurethral cystolitholapaxy was required in 10 patients (20.4%), percutaneous suprapubic cystolitholapaxy was performed in 4 patients (8.1%), and holmium laser lithotripsy was performed in 2 patients (4.08%). Conclusions: Foreign bodies should always be included in the differential diagnosis when evaluating a patient who presents with chronic lower urinary tract symptoms. A large percentage of foreign bodies can be retrieved using endoscopic techniques. Open surgical removal may be performed in cases where endoscopic techniques are unsuitable or have failed.
Abstract
Purpose: This study was performed to characterise the nature, clinical presentation, mode of insertion, and management of intravesical foreign bodies in patients treated at our hospital. Methods: Between January 2008 and December 2014, 49 patients were treated for intravesical foreign bodies at King George Medical University, Lucknow. All records of these patients were retrospectively analysed to characterise the nature of the foreign body, each patient’s clinical presentation, the mode of insertion, and how the case was managed. Results: A total of 49 foreign bodies were retrieved from patients’ urinary bladders during the study period. The patients ranged in age from 11 to 68 years. Thirty-three patients presented with complaints of haematuria (67.3%), 29 complained of frequency of urination and dysuria (59.1%), and 5 patients reported pelvic pain (10.2%). The circumstances of insertion were iatrogenic in 20 cases (40.8%), self-insertion in 17 cases (34.6%), sexual abuse in 4 cases (8.1%), migration from another organ in 4 cases (8.1%), and assault in 4 cases (8.1%). Of the foreign bodies, 33 (67.3%) were retrieved by cystoscopy, while transurethral cystolitholapaxy was required in 10 patients (20.4%), percutaneous suprapubic cystolitholapaxy was performed in 4 patients (8.1%), and holmium laser lithotripsy was performed in 2 patients (4.08%). Conclusions: Foreign bodies should always be included in the differential diagnosis when evaluating a patient who presents with chronic lower urinary tract symptoms. A large percentage of foreign bodies can be retrieved using endoscopic techniques. Open surgical removal may be performed in cases where endoscopic techniques are unsuitable or have failed.
참고문헌 (28)
- Sukkarieh T, "Multiple foreign bodies in the anterior and posterior urethra", Int Braz J Urol, 30, pp.219~220 (2004)
- Ejstrud P, "Laparoscopic removal of an electric wire from the bladder", Br J Urol, 80, pp.338~ (1997)
- Andrews NJ, "Colovesical fistula caused by a chicken bone", Br J Urol, 62, pp.617~ (1988)
- Potter D, "Colovesical fistula following ingestion of a foreign body", Br J Urol, 81, pp.499~500 (1998)
- Nishiyama K, "En-doscopic removal of intravesical thermometer using a rigid nephroscope and forceps", Int J Urol, 9, pp.717~718 (2002)
- Gulanikar A, "A bullet in the bladder", Br J Urol, 82, pp.304~ (1998)
- el-Diasty TA, "Bladder stone: a complication of intravesical migration of Lippes loop", Scand J Urol Nephrol, 27, pp.279~280 (1993)
- Forester ND, "Bladder stones associated with synthetic absorbable sutures in children", BJU Int, 88, pp.984~ (2001)
- Ward HC, "Surgical staples in bladder calculi after caecocystoplasty", Br J Urol, 60, pp.375~ (1987)
- Kochakarn W, "Foreign bodies in the female urinary bladder: 20-year experience in Ramathibodi Hospital", Asian J Surg, 31, pp.130~133 (2008)
- Lin TY, "Gossypiboma: migration of retained surgical gauze and spontaneous transurethral protrusion", BJU Int, 84, pp.879~880 (1999)
- Eckford SD, "Intravesical foreign bodies: five-year review", Br J Urol, 69, pp.41~45 (1992)
- Habermacher G, "Intravesical holmium laser fragmentation and removal of detached resectoscope sheath tip", J Urol, 174(4 Pt 1), pp.1296~1297 (2005)
- Hutton KA, "Percutaneous retrieval of an intravesical foreign body using direct transurethral visualization: a technique applicable to small children", BJU Int, 83, pp.337~338 (1999)
- van Ophoven A, "Clinical management of foreign bodies of the genitourinary tract", J Urol, 164, pp.274~287 (2000)
- Rafique M, "Intravesical foreign bodies: review and current management strategies", Urol J, 5, pp.223~231 (2008)
- Dindo D, "Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336patients and results of a survey", Ann Surg, 240, pp.205~213 (2004)
- Rahman NU, "Self-inflicted male urethral foreign body insertion: endoscopic management and complications", BJU Int, 94, pp.1051~1053 (2004)
- Campbell RJ, "Psychiatric dictionary" (1981), Oxford University Press
- Trehan RK, "Successful removal of a telephone cable, a foreign body through the urethra into the bladder:a case report", J Med Case Rep, 1, pp.153~ (2007)
- Costa G, "Self-introduction of foreign bodies into the urethra: a multidisciplinary problem", Int Urol Nephrol, 25, pp.77~81 (1993)
- Urol Int, "Sonographic detection of a foreign body in the urethra and urinary bladder", Urol Int, 64, pp.178~180 (2000)
- Dietrick DD, "Intravesical migration of intrauterine device", J Urol, 147, pp.132~134 (1992)
- Lee JD, "Self-introduction of unusual foreign body into the urethra: a case report", Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei), 56, pp.440~442 (1995)
- Stravodimos KG, "Electrical wire as a foreign body in a male urethra: a case report", J Med Case Rep, 3, pp.49~ (2009)
- Wyatt J, "Use of Holmium:YAG laser to facilitate removal of intravesical foreign bodies", J Endourol, 20, pp.672~674 (2006)
- Mannan A, "Foreign bodies in the urinary bladder and their management: a Pakistani experience", Singapore Med J, 52, pp.24~28 (2011)
- Graefen M, "The modified Clavien system: a plea for a standardized reporting system for surgical complications", Eur Urol, 57, pp.387~389 (2010)