Corona 19 and the Need for global Citizenship: Focusing on the Discussion of Ulrich Beck
1
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Ulrich Beck defined modern society as a risk society. The cause of this was found in modernity. It also suggested reflective modernity as an alternative to overcome the risk of modern society. Since then, this discussion has developed into a discussion of the world risk society and suggested global citizenship as an alternative to overcome this risk. The premise of global citizenship is the individual's ability to reflect. However, as the Corona 19 is spreading, fear and anxiety are emerging in the form of discrimination, violence and exclusion. This aspect is understood as the ambivalence of the individualization theme mentioned by Beck. For the positive effect of individualization, Beck raises the need for a sub-politics of social formation from the bottom, centered on autonomous citizens. But the premise of this sub-politics is citizens who have organized democratic values. In response, this paper raises the need for education for world citizens who systematize democratic values in the present situation facing global risk.
Abstract
Ulrich Beck defined modern society as a risk society. The cause of this was found in modernity. It also suggested reflective modernity as an alternative to overcome the risk of modern society. Since then, this discussion has developed into a discussion of the world risk society and suggested global citizenship as an alternative to overcome this risk. The premise of global citizenship is the individual's ability to reflect. However, as the Corona 19 is spreading, fear and anxiety are emerging in the form of discrimination, violence and exclusion. This aspect is understood as the ambivalence of the individualization theme mentioned by Beck. For the positive effect of individualization, Beck raises the need for a sub-politics of social formation from the bottom, centered on autonomous citizens. But the premise of this sub-politics is citizens who have organized democratic values. In response, this paper raises the need for education for world citizens who systematize democratic values in the present situation facing global risk.
참고문헌 (26)
- 김석수, "칸트 세계시민사상의 현대적 의의", 칸트연구, (14), pp.225~262 (2004), 한국칸트학회
- 노진철, "불확성 시대의 위험사회학" (2010), 한울아카데미
- 도종윤, "코로나19 이후의 국제정세: 보건안보의 관점에서 우리의 전략", JPI 정책포럼, 2020(4), pp.1~18 (2020)
- 마사 C. 누스바움, "세계시민주의의 전통" (2020), 뿌리와이파리
- 오인영, "나라를 사랑한다는 것 : 애국주의와 세계시민주의의 한계 논쟁" (2003), 삼인
- 변종헌, "세계시민성 관념과 지구적 시민성의 가능성", 윤리교육연구, (10), pp.139~162 (2006), 한국윤리교육학회
- 송재룡, "울리히 벡의 코스모폴리탄 비전과 그 한계: 공동체주의 입장에서", 현상과 인식, 34(4), pp.93~119 (2010), 한국인문사회과학회
- 앤소니 기든스, "성찰적 근대화" (1998), 한울
- 울리히 벡, "적이 사라진 민주주의" (2000), 새물결
- 이진우, "글로벌 위험사회" (2010), 도서출판 길
- 울리히 벡, "위험사회-새로운 근대(성)을 향하여" (1997), 새물결
- 홍찬숙, "세계화 시대의 권력과 대항권력" (2011), 길
- 울리히 벡, "위험에 처한 세계: 비판이론의 새로운 과제", 사회와 이론, (12), pp.7~36 (2008), 한국이론사회학회
- 이왕휘, "울리히 벡의 세계위험사회(World Risk Society) : 국제정치학적 분석", Crisisonomy, 4(1), pp.63~71 (2008), (사)위기관리이론과실천
- 홍찬숙, "울리히 벡의 ‘위험사회’와 ‘하위 정치’의 마키아벨리즘: 개인화 테제를 중심으로", 사회와 이론, (14), pp.213~241 (2009), 한국이론사회학회
- 홍찬숙, "계급론 대 개인화 이론?: 계급정치에서 (세계)시민정치로", 한국사회학, 48(2), pp.107~132 (2014), 한국사회학회
- 홍찬숙, "개인화: 해방과 위험의 양면성" (2015), 서울대학교출판문화원
- 홍찬숙, "울리히 벡" (2016), 커뮤니케이션북스
- 홍찬숙, "세계사회, 지구화, 세계시민주의 사회학: 루만, 기든스, 벡의 세계화 관련 논의 비교", 한국사회학, 50(4), pp.135~168 (2016), 한국사회학회
- Beck, Ulrich, "Individualization: Institutionalized Individualism and its Social and Political Consequences" (2002), Sage
- Beck, Ulrich, "Conversation with Ulrich Beck" (2004), Polity
- Beck, Ulrich, "Living in the world risk society", Economy and Society, 35(3), pp.329~345 (2006)
- Brent K. Marshall, "Globalisation, Environmental Degradation and Ulrich Beck’s Society", Environmental Values, 8(2), pp.254~275 (1999)
- Ossman, Susan, "Beck’s Cosmopolitan Vision or Plays on the Nation", Ethnos, 71(7), pp.559~568 (2006)
- Ossman, Susan, "The Cosmopolitan Vision" (2006), Polity Press
- "WHO Coronavirus Disease (CoVID-19) Dasboard" (2020)[URL]