본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Diagnostic performance of cardiovascular magnetic resonance parametric mapping as per modified Lake Louise Criteria in acute myocarditis: an updated systematic review and meta‑analysis

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류내과학

초록

Background Cardiovascular magnetic resonance mapping parameters—native T1 mapping, T2 mapping, and extracellular volume (ECV)—are key for diagnosing acute myocarditis under the modified 2018 Lake Louise Criteria (mLLC). This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated their diagnostic performance and established optimal thresholds for acute myocarditis. Methods We reviewed articles published in the past decade utilizing parametric mapping for myocarditis diagnosis. Data on sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) were extracted. Quality assessment was conducted using the QUADAS-2 tool by two independent reviewers. Results Eleven studies with 677 patients were included. Native T1 mapping showed sensitivity of 83%, specificity of 86%, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of 39, and an AUC of 0.91. T2 mapping had sensitivity of 81%, specificity of 86%, DOR of 25, and an AUC of 0.89. ECV demonstrated sensitivity of 71%, specificity of 81%, DOR of 13, and an AUC of 0.83. Mean control values were 1,039 ± 39.23 ms for native T1 mapping, 57 ± 5.18 ms for T2 mapping, and 31% ± 5.60% for ECV. Optimal thresholds were 1,021 ms for native T1 mapping, 52 ms for T2 mapping, and 28% for ECV based on receiver operating characteristic curves analysis based on 1.5-T scanner value. Native T1 mapping showed the highest diagnostic accuracy. Subgroup analysis found no significant sensitivity differences based on biopsy or clinical criteria. Conclusions Parametric mapping, particularly native T1, demonstrated strong diagnostic performance for acute myocarditis compared to T2 mapping and ECV within the modified 2018 Lake Louise Criteria framework. Incorporating these cardiovascular magnetic resonance parameters may improve diagnostic accuracy. Further research is recommended to refine these findings and optimize diagnostic strategies.

Abstract

Background Cardiovascular magnetic resonance mapping parameters—native T1 mapping, T2 mapping, and extracellular volume (ECV)—are key for diagnosing acute myocarditis under the modified 2018 Lake Louise Criteria (mLLC). This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated their diagnostic performance and established optimal thresholds for acute myocarditis. Methods We reviewed articles published in the past decade utilizing parametric mapping for myocarditis diagnosis. Data on sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) were extracted. Quality assessment was conducted using the QUADAS-2 tool by two independent reviewers. Results Eleven studies with 677 patients were included. Native T1 mapping showed sensitivity of 83%, specificity of 86%, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of 39, and an AUC of 0.91. T2 mapping had sensitivity of 81%, specificity of 86%, DOR of 25, and an AUC of 0.89. ECV demonstrated sensitivity of 71%, specificity of 81%, DOR of 13, and an AUC of 0.83. Mean control values were 1,039 ± 39.23 ms for native T1 mapping, 57 ± 5.18 ms for T2 mapping, and 31% ± 5.60% for ECV. Optimal thresholds were 1,021 ms for native T1 mapping, 52 ms for T2 mapping, and 28% for ECV based on receiver operating characteristic curves analysis based on 1.5-T scanner value. Native T1 mapping showed the highest diagnostic accuracy. Subgroup analysis found no significant sensitivity differences based on biopsy or clinical criteria. Conclusions Parametric mapping, particularly native T1, demonstrated strong diagnostic performance for acute myocarditis compared to T2 mapping and ECV within the modified 2018 Lake Louise Criteria framework. Incorporating these cardiovascular magnetic resonance parameters may improve diagnostic accuracy. Further research is recommended to refine these findings and optimize diagnostic strategies.

관련 논문AI추천

Early and Follow-up CMR Features of Acute Biventricular MyocarditisAhmed BenDriss, Jean-Pierre Laissy한국심초음파학회 · Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging2022 · 제30권 제1호Phantom-Validated Reference Values of Myocardial Mapping and Extracellular Volume at 3T in Healthy Koreans김판기, 정정임, 최병욱, Eun-Jin Lee대한자기공명의과학회 · Investigative Magnetic Resonance Imaging2020 · 제24권 제3호Multiparametric Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging Detects Altered Myocardial Tissue and Function in Heart Transplantation Recipients Monitored for Cardiac Allograft VasculopathyAllen S. Anderson, Allison M. Blake, Clyde W. Yancy, Daniel Lee, Esther E. Vorovich, James C. Carr, Jane E. Wilcox, Jonathan D. Rich, Kambiz Ghafourian, Michael Markl, Muhannad A. Abbasi, Roberto Sarnari, Sadiya S. Khan한국심초음파학회 · Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging2022 · 제30권 제4호The Use of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance in Patients with Suspected Coronary Artery Disease: A Clinical Practice Perspective장성아, Raymond J. Kim한국심초음파학회 · Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging2016 · 제24권 제2호Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Versus Histopathologic Study for Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Cardiac Tumours: A Systematic Review and Meta-AnalysisAna Filipa Amador, Catarina Martins da Costa, Elisabete Martins, Sandra Nóbrega, Sofia Justo한국심초음파학회 · Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging2023 · 제31권 제4호Recent Update of Advanced Imaging for Diagnosis of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: Based on the Findings of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Positron Emission Tomography이원우, 장수연, 전은주대한자기공명의과학회 · Investigative Magnetic Resonance Imaging2019 · 제23권 제2호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (16건)