Who knows what and to what extent - modeling the knowledge of the narrative agent
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The knowledge of the narrative agent not only constitutes the content and meaning of the narrative itself, but is also closely related to the emotional response of the recipient. Also, the disparity of knowledge between narrative agents is an important factor in making a narrative richer and more interesting. But It tends to be treated as a sub-topic of narration theory or genre/style studies rather than an independent subject of narrative studies or criticism. In this paper, I propose a model that can systematically and quantitatively analyze the knowledge of narrative agents. The proposed model consists of the knowledge structure that represents a narrative, the knowledge state that expresses the knowledge of narrative agent as a degree of belief, and the knowledge flow that means changes in the knowledge state according to the development of events. In addition, the formal notation of the knowledge structure and a probabilistic inference model that could obtain the state of knowledge were proposed, and the knowledge structure and knowledge flow were analyzed by applying the model to the actual narrative. It is expected that the proposed model will be of practical help in the creation and evaluation of narratives.
Abstract
The knowledge of the narrative agent not only constitutes the content and meaning of the narrative itself, but is also closely related to the emotional response of the recipient. Also, the disparity of knowledge between narrative agents is an important factor in making a narrative richer and more interesting. But It tends to be treated as a sub-topic of narration theory or genre/style studies rather than an independent subject of narrative studies or criticism. In this paper, I propose a model that can systematically and quantitatively analyze the knowledge of narrative agents. The proposed model consists of the knowledge structure that represents a narrative, the knowledge state that expresses the knowledge of narrative agent as a degree of belief, and the knowledge flow that means changes in the knowledge state according to the development of events. In addition, the formal notation of the knowledge structure and a probabilistic inference model that could obtain the state of knowledge were proposed, and the knowledge structure and knowledge flow were analyzed by applying the model to the actual narrative. It is expected that the proposed model will be of practical help in the creation and evaluation of narratives.
참고문헌 (13)
- Branigan, Edward, "Narrative comprehension and film" (2013), Routledge
- Event schemas, story schemas, and story grammars, "Brewer, William F.", Center for the Study of Reading, ~, pp.Technical Report; no. 197 (1980)
- William F. Brewer, "Stories are to entertain: A structural-affect theory of stories", Journal of Pragmatics, 6(5-6), pp.473~486 (1982), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- Chatman, Seymour Benjamin, "Story and discourse: Narrative structure in fiction and film" (1980), Cornell University Press
- Ann L. Cunliffe, "Narrative Temporality: Implications for Organizational Research", Organization Studies, 25(2), pp.261~286 (2004), SAGE Publications[DOI]
- Genette, Gérard, "Narrative discourse revisited" (1988), Cornell University Press
- Graesser, Arthur C., "Narrative comprehension, causality, and coherence", pp.83~98 (1999), Routledge
- Herman, David, "Routledge encyclopedia of narrative theory" (2010), Routledge
- 권호창, "A Computational Model to Detect Affective Response Based on Narrative Agent’s Knowledge", International Journal of Contents, 16(3), pp.51~65 (2020), 한국콘텐츠학회[DOI]
- Kwon, Hochang, "A model of narrative creation knowledge support from an information processing perspective", Doctoral, pp.2017
- Rahwan, Iyad, "Argumentation in artificial intelligence. Vol. 47" (2009), Springer
- Jennifer Rowley, "The wisdom hierarchy: representations of the DIKW hierarchy", Journal of Information Science, 33(2), pp.163~180 (2007), SAGE Publications[DOI]
- Shafer, Glenn, "A mathematical theory of evidence. Vol. 42" (1976), Princeton university press