남북한 통일 정책의 변화로 본 북한연극연구사
Research History of North Korean Theater from the Viewpoint of the Unification Policy in Stages
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
What is noteworthy with regard to the researches related to North Korean theater is that there are periods in which the researches were actively made, there are particular periods that are excluded from research objects, and there are untapped territories in research themes. The periods in which the researches were actively made were the period from 1990 to1991 and from 1997 to 2004. The reason is that the July 7 declaration in 1988 and the ‘Korean race community unification plan’in 1989 caused the social sentiments toward North Korea to be transferred from cold war to dissolution,and expanded the interest in North Korea. The 1st South-North Korea high level talks held in Seoul on September 5, 1990 and the 2nd South-North Korea high level talks held in Pyeongyang on October 17 are the examples that show this fact. The publication of the books on the North Korean theater and art at intervals of 4 or 5 months for one year in 1990 is also related to this fact. The other period from 1997 to 2004 in which the researches were active belongs to the early and middle of the ‘entering period of reconciliation and cooperation,’and during this period, Kim Dae-jung government developed the engagement policy towards North Korea and promoted exchanges and cooperation in the economic area. What matters is that such attitudes of the government influence not only politics but also academic circles. It is because an absolutely isolated place does not exist in a society. Second, the reason for the existence of the period that is excluded from the research objects or of the period which did not draw the researchers’ interest is related to the availability of relevant data. The data related to the 1970s are the most and are easily available. It is because movierevolution, opera revolution, theater revolution took place in a row in the 1970s and North Korea itself calls this period the revolutionary period. Third, the reason for existence of untapped territories in theater themes is the characteristics of theater art whose creation and extinction occur simultaneously. Unlike movies, theater has no objectified texts. And it is also because researches related to North Korea began with political and socialaspects and literature. Due to the characteristics of North Korea where politics and art are not separated, political and social researches, researches on ideological implications form the main stream, and the start with the viewpoint of literature becomes the mechanism that produces researches on theater and play in large quantities. If so, what is the desirable environment for researches on North Korean theater? The ‘closed society’of North Korea makes it impossible for individual researchers to have academic delight and passion. As revealed in the course of making researches, the political and social environment has a profound effect on the researches on North Korea. Accordingly, consistent national supports are needed. And balanced researches are also needed. To achieve this, first, the viewpoints themselves should become diverse. Researches from the political and social viewpoint have been the mainstream up to the present, but in the future, they should be accompanied by researches from the viewpoint of theater and art.
Abstract
What is noteworthy with regard to the researches related to North Korean theater is that there are periods in which the researches were actively made, there are particular periods that are excluded from research objects, and there are untapped territories in research themes. The periods in which the researches were actively made were the period from 1990 to1991 and from 1997 to 2004. The reason is that the July 7 declaration in 1988 and the ‘Korean race community unification plan’in 1989 caused the social sentiments toward North Korea to be transferred from cold war to dissolution,and expanded the interest in North Korea. The 1st South-North Korea high level talks held in Seoul on September 5, 1990 and the 2nd South-North Korea high level talks held in Pyeongyang on October 17 are the examples that show this fact. The publication of the books on the North Korean theater and art at intervals of 4 or 5 months for one year in 1990 is also related to this fact. The other period from 1997 to 2004 in which the researches were active belongs to the early and middle of the ‘entering period of reconciliation and cooperation,’and during this period, Kim Dae-jung government developed the engagement policy towards North Korea and promoted exchanges and cooperation in the economic area. What matters is that such attitudes of the government influence not only politics but also academic circles. It is because an absolutely isolated place does not exist in a society. Second, the reason for the existence of the period that is excluded from the research objects or of the period which did not draw the researchers’ interest is related to the availability of relevant data. The data related to the 1970s are the most and are easily available. It is because movierevolution, opera revolution, theater revolution took place in a row in the 1970s and North Korea itself calls this period the revolutionary period. Third, the reason for existence of untapped territories in theater themes is the characteristics of theater art whose creation and extinction occur simultaneously. Unlike movies, theater has no objectified texts. And it is also because researches related to North Korea began with political and socialaspects and literature. Due to the characteristics of North Korea where politics and art are not separated, political and social researches, researches on ideological implications form the main stream, and the start with the viewpoint of literature becomes the mechanism that produces researches on theater and play in large quantities. If so, what is the desirable environment for researches on North Korean theater? The ‘closed society’of North Korea makes it impossible for individual researchers to have academic delight and passion. As revealed in the course of making researches, the political and social environment has a profound effect on the researches on North Korea. Accordingly, consistent national supports are needed. And balanced researches are also needed. To achieve this, first, the viewpoints themselves should become diverse. Researches from the political and social viewpoint have been the mainstream up to the present, but in the future, they should be accompanied by researches from the viewpoint of theater and art.
참고문헌 (36)
- 김문환, "북한의 예술" (1990), 을유문화사
- 김형기, "남북관계 변천사" (2010), 연세대학교 출판부
- 희곡의 분석과 전망, "북한 연극", pp.2007, 박영정
- 민병욱, "북한 연극의 이해" (2001), 삼영사
- 서연호, "북한의 공연예술Ⅰ" (1990), 고려원
- 서연호, "우리 연극 100년" (2000), 현암사
- 심지연, "남북한 통일방안의 전개와 수렴" (2001), 도서출판 돌베개
- 이강렬, "한국사회주의 연극운동사" (1992), 동문선
- 이종석, "새로 쓴 현대북한의 이해" (2005), 역사비평사
- 이종석, "분단시대의 통일학" (1998), 한울 아카데미
- 이현주, "해방전후 통일운동의 전개와 시련" (2008), 지식산업사
- 한국비평문학회, "북한의 가극․연극 40년" (1990), 신원문화사
- 김겸섭, "북한 문예정책의 변화와 북한 연극의 미학", 통일문제연구, pp.163~180 (2004), 영남대학교 통일문제연구소
- 김영균, "북한 경희극의 특질-1990년 이후 작품을 중심으로-", 한국연극연구, pp.74~106 (2001), 한국연극사학회
- 김정수, "연극론 『연극예술에 대하여』의 특성 연구", 공연문화연구, (22), pp.123~155 (2011), 한국공연문화학회
- 김정수, "한국전쟁시기 북한 연극의 공연양상 연구 - 인물(人物)과 연기(演技)를 중심으로 -", 북한연구학회보, 14(1), pp.126~151 (2010), 북한연구학회
- 김정수, "「조선예술」로 본 1990년대 북한연극의 핵심코드", 북한연구학회보, 15(1), pp.165~188 (2011), 북한연구학회
- 김정수, "북한 연극계에서 제기된 청산(淸算)대상 연기(演技)에 관한 연구 : 해방직후부터 한국전쟁 이전까지를 중심으로", 정신문화연구, 33(2), pp.47~71 (2010), 한국학중앙연구원
- 김정수, "북한 연극의 창작방법론 연구-1950년대의 인물, 대사, 연기, 연출에 관한 담론을 중심으로-", 한국연극학, (41), pp.5~36 (2010), 한국연극학회
- 김정수, "해방기 북한연극의 공연미학", 공연문화연구, 1(20), pp.29~61 (2010), 한국공연문화학회
- 김정수, "북한 문학예술의 유형분류 연구 -분류개념과 기준을 중심으로-", 공연문화연구, (19), pp.123~160 (2009), 한국공연문화학회
- 김정수, "남북한 연극인들의 희곡분석법과 연기법: 차이(差異)와 접점(接點)", 현대북한연구, 13(1), pp.76~117 (2011), 북한대학원대학교
- 김주언, "1930년대 남", 북 연극사 서술에 대한 비교 연구, 1997, ~[DOI]
- 박영정, "북한 경희극 연구", 어문론총, 38, pp.181~215 (2003), 한국문학언어학회
- 박영정, "북한연극의 공연방식과 미학", 한국극예술연구, 13, pp.201~228 (2001), 한국극예술학회
- 박영정, "1990년대 북한 희곡의 개관", 한국극예술연구, 14, pp.184~215 (2001), 한국극예술학회
- 박영정, "북한 문학사에 나타난 희곡사 서술의 양상-류만 저, 조선문학사(1926-1945) 8․9를 중심으로-", 한국극예술연구, 9, pp.313~340 (1999), 한국극예술학회
- 서연호, "북한연극의 실태와 원리에 관한 고찰", 한국음악사학보, (28), pp.195~215 (2002), 한국음악사학회
- 엄국천, "북한연극의 연구현황과 이후의 연구방향", 한국예술종합학교논문집, 3 (2000), 한국예술종합학교
- 유진월, "북한연극의 혁명적 여성상과 연극성 -꽃파는 처녀를 중심으로-", 한국연극연구, pp.159~183 (2001), 한국연극사학회
- 유진월, "북한 문예이론의 변천과 연극", 한국의 민속과 문화(구한국문화연구), pp.91~112 (1999), 경희대학교 민속학 연구소
- 이상우, "극양식을 중심으로 본 북한 희곡의 양상", 한국극예술연구, 11, pp.379~425 (2000), 한국극예술학회
- 이석만, "1950년대 북한 연극론의 전개양상 연구 -1950년 6월부터 1958년을 중심으로-", 한국연극학, 9, pp.279~298 (1997), 한국연극학회
- 이일수, "북한의 연극에 대한 이해와 비판", 현대이념연구, pp.135~150 (1991), 군산대학교 현대이념연구소
- 이원희, "북한의 5대 혁명연극에 관하여", 한국의 민속과 문화, pp.167~189 (1998), 경희대학교 민속학연구소
- 임옥규, "해방기 북한 문학예술의 강령과 창작의 실제 -서사문학과 공연예술을 중심으로-", 우리어문연구, (42), pp.277~313 (2012), 우리어문학회
