조선후기 賜牌田의 失傳과 不遷位 位土의 마련

Abstract

The Bunjaeki owned in head family of Kim Jongjik are 40 pieces, and they are one of best preserved documents among all ancient documents owned by that family and also so valuable as material for study. Among those Bunjaeki, the Bunjaeki which was given to Sason Kim Semyeong from Kim's family at 1724(Kyeongjong 4) is a document written for the eldest grandson of that family as Kim's families prepared financial asset to buy Jewijo for their ancestor Kim Jongjik's Bulcheonwi. According to the document, it said that they are making Jewijo for Bulcheonwi because they lost Sapaejeon. But actually not only there is no mention on the reason why the Sapaejeon was lost, but also there is no related records in material owned by that family. The 82 pieces of family documents of Kim Jongjik's head family were confirmed by ancient document investigation performed by the Committee of Joseon History Compilation and they are now being preserved as negative glass material at the National History Compilation. Among 82 documents, 18 of them are the materials related to Sapaejeon mentioned above at Bunjaeki. According to those documents, most of them are about Sapaejeon litigation, and we could understand the details through these how the Sapaejeon of Kim Jongjik's family was lost and what efforts his descendants made to regain it. Kim Jongjik received this Sapaejeon from Seongjong as Sapaejeondab while he was in recuperation from disease at Milyang. It was confiscated by the government at Muosawha after his death and regained at Jungjongbanjeong by restoration of his status. We can learn this from Bunjeaki written by Kim Ryun's wife Ha Ssi at 1584(Seonjo 17). The where about of Sapaejeon after the outbreak of Imjinwaeran was not known. But we could assume that Kim Gabryeong regained Sapaejeon before about 1600(Seonjo 33) through 9 of Eusong and 1 of Kwan from 1633(Injo 11) to 1738(Yeongjo 14) and it had been remained until Sookjong period. The reason of loss of this Sapaejeon is because of continuous occupation with fake documents by residents in Dongrae area in the situation that most of the land were destroyed by Imjinwaeran. The other reason is that Kim Kabryeong and his descendents, who had administered the Sapaejeon, were in poverty, so they sold the land except those occupied by others. If we examine the Eusong written at 1653(Hyojong 4) and most of Eusongs written after that, it said Kim Kabryeong or his posterity sold the Sapaejeon without family's permission, so they were asking to punish these and allow to regain the Sapaejeon. The duty serving to Kim Jongjik's Bulcheonwi is thought to be after completion of duty service by 4 generations, but we can't clearly know if it was carried out also after 4 generations' duty service. But we can know through Bunjaeki written at 1724 that Bulcheonwi had been served at least from this time. And the family gathered financial assets to buy Wito to serve Bulcheonwi and we could examine that they originally tried to buy Wito with Sapaejeon. This has a meaning that we could understand how a family received, administered and inherited Sapaejeon and how they lost it through a Bunjaeki and its contents related to Sapaejeon and documents related to Sapaejeon, I think this would be a contribution to studying the Sapaejeon. And the point that the families and relatives gathered their financial assets to form ancestor's Bulcheonwi Wito to replace lost Sapaejeon has a meaning as a particular case that only this family has.