농촌마을 공간특성과 어메니티자원의 입지분석
The Spatial Location Analysis of Rural Village and Amenity Resources
2
조회
0
다운로드
10
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The aim of the research was to analyze a correlation between rural villages and a space of amenity resources in order to provide objective basic data for rural renewal planning in the future. 15 villages were selected to analyze amenity resources. A Space Syntax Method(SSM) was used to analyze a spacial structure of each village and location characteristics of amenity resources. Finally, Statistical Package for the Social Sciences(SPSS) was used for a cluster analysis. The results of spacial analysis showed that the MeanDepth of rural villages was 4.482 and Global Integration Value(GInteg) was 0.956. Relatively, a depth was lower and GInteg was higher, compared to other villages. Rural villages were easily recognized and accessible by outsiders, compared to mountain and fishing villages. In the case of rural villages, the MeanDepth of amenity resources was low and GInteg was high in the results of cluster analysis using a nonhierachical method. Results indicated that an access was easy and amenity resources were closely located each other. However, the deviation of each village was great in mountain villages. This research suggests that an effective maintenance of road network for improving accessibility would be given priority in an undeveloped farming and fishing villages' renewal. Especially, using a spacial analysis in village renewal planning process can improve accessibility and maximize an utilization of public facilities and amenity resources.
Abstract
The aim of the research was to analyze a correlation between rural villages and a space of amenity resources in order to provide objective basic data for rural renewal planning in the future. 15 villages were selected to analyze amenity resources. A Space Syntax Method(SSM) was used to analyze a spacial structure of each village and location characteristics of amenity resources. Finally, Statistical Package for the Social Sciences(SPSS) was used for a cluster analysis. The results of spacial analysis showed that the MeanDepth of rural villages was 4.482 and Global Integration Value(GInteg) was 0.956. Relatively, a depth was lower and GInteg was higher, compared to other villages. Rural villages were easily recognized and accessible by outsiders, compared to mountain and fishing villages. In the case of rural villages, the MeanDepth of amenity resources was low and GInteg was high in the results of cluster analysis using a nonhierachical method. Results indicated that an access was easy and amenity resources were closely located each other. However, the deviation of each village was great in mountain villages. This research suggests that an effective maintenance of road network for improving accessibility would be given priority in an undeveloped farming and fishing villages' renewal. Especially, using a spacial analysis in village renewal planning process can improve accessibility and maximize an utilization of public facilities and amenity resources.
참고문헌 (14)
- 강구, "Space Syntax 방법론에 의한 농촌마을 공간구조 분석", 석사, 지역자원시스템공학, pp.2004
- "법제처", 국가법령정보센터[URL]
- 국립산림과학원, "전국산촌기초조사", ~ (2003)
- 김대식, "농촌중심마을의 공간적 입지-배분 모형의 개발", 한국농공학회지, 43(2), pp.112~121 (2001)
- "그린투어 경남"[URL]
- "농촌어메니티 정보시스템", 농촌 진흥청 국립농업과학원[URL]
- "바다여행"[URL]
- 서주환, "도시민의 라이프스타일에 따른 농촌어메니티자원 선호도 분석", 농촌계획, 18(4), pp.117~127 (2012), 한국농촌계획학회[DOI]
- 이학식, "SPSS 18.0 매뉴얼", pp.437~463 (2011), 집현재
- 이행욱, "Space Syntax를 이용한 농촌마을종합개발사업 권역의 공간구조분석에 관한 연구", 농촌계획, 10(4), pp.19~28 (2004), 한국농촌계획학회
- 임승빈, "농촌 문화마을 주거환경개선을 위한 공간계획 방향 연구: 경기도 양평군 광탄리 용문지구 문화마을계획을 중심으로", 농촌계획, 4(1), pp.22~31 (1998)
- 張澤柱, "농촌지역의 생활권에 대응한 시설설치계획에 관한 연구", 박사, 건축공학, pp.1994
- 최영완, "농촌공간의 구조적 특성에 바탕으로 한 어메니티자원 분류체계 재정립", 농촌계획, 18(1), pp.1~8 (2012), 한국농촌계획학회
- 최영완, "농촌마을정비시 농촌공간특성별 정비유형 분석", 농촌계획, 16(2), pp.1~10 (2010), 한국농촌계획학회