본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Contact and Prospect: Imaginative Geography in the Travel Writings of Richard E. Kim in the Late 1980s

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류기타인문학

초록

This study examines the meaning of the imaginative geography created by contact with communist countries and the prospects for a post-Cold War world. It analyzes newspaper articles, TV documentaries, and the written travelogue about Richard E. Kim’s (Korean name Kim Ŭn’guk 金恩國) travels to China and the Soviet Union in the late 1980s. During this time, neither China nor the Soviet Union had established diplomatic ties with South Korea, and they were not regions in which Koreans could travel freely. As such, the Korean public’s perception of communist countries was somewhat limited. However, as a U.S. citizen, Kim could travel to these countries, and his travels subsequently received significant attention from the South Korean public. Kim gave accounts of his travels in newspapers and books and on TV, but the interpretations of these trips differed according to the medium. Newspapers and documentaries represented the communist countries and the lives of ethnic Koreans according to Cold War Orientalism and emphasized nationalist identity, while Kim’s travelogue departed from both Cold War Orientalism and nationalist identity. Kim’s approach emphasized differences that could not be unified and presented a desirable subjectivity for the upcoming post-Cold War era. In sum, while the documentaries highlighted nationalism, Kim’s travel writing suggested a cosmopolitan subjectivity, two perspectives that differed radically in their prospects for the future.

Abstract

This study examines the meaning of the imaginative geography created by contact with communist countries and the prospects for a post-Cold War world. It analyzes newspaper articles, TV documentaries, and the written travelogue about Richard E. Kim’s (Korean name Kim Ŭn’guk 金恩國) travels to China and the Soviet Union in the late 1980s. During this time, neither China nor the Soviet Union had established diplomatic ties with South Korea, and they were not regions in which Koreans could travel freely. As such, the Korean public’s perception of communist countries was somewhat limited. However, as a U.S. citizen, Kim could travel to these countries, and his travels subsequently received significant attention from the South Korean public. Kim gave accounts of his travels in newspapers and books and on TV, but the interpretations of these trips differed according to the medium. Newspapers and documentaries represented the communist countries and the lives of ethnic Koreans according to Cold War Orientalism and emphasized nationalist identity, while Kim’s travelogue departed from both Cold War Orientalism and nationalist identity. Kim’s approach emphasized differences that could not be unified and presented a desirable subjectivity for the upcoming post-Cold War era. In sum, while the documentaries highlighted nationalism, Kim’s travel writing suggested a cosmopolitan subjectivity, two perspectives that differed radically in their prospects for the future.

참고문헌 (38)

  1. 장문석, "슬픈 육체를 가진 짐승이 내는 별들의 토론 소리 — 최인훈의 �화두�와 소련이라는 질문", 인문논총, 77(3), pp.111~169 (2020), 인문학연구원[DOI]
  2. 조덕현, "한국탐구 1부: 소련 땅의 한인을 찾아서", ~ (1988)
  3. 조덕현, "한국탐구 2부: 소련 땅의 한인을찾아서", ~ (1988)
  4. 정주아, "월남민(越南民) 김은국의 경계 넘기와 ‘유랑민", 세계시민’으로서의 글쓰기: 냉전기 디아스포라 문학의 정치성, 2019, pp.(59), 299~331[DOI]
  5. 정중헌, "민족의 同質性, 자긍심 일깨운力作—「소련땅의 韓人 찾어서」 객관적 시각으로 보여줘", 조선일보, ~ (1988)
  6. 정인모, "하인리히 뵐이 본 김은국의 『순교자』", 독어교육, 31, pp.491~513 (2004), 한국독어독문학교육학회
  7. 정은경, "이중언어의 맥락과 독자-김은국의 『순교자』 읽기의 결락된 한 맥락을 찾아서", 어문논집, (81), pp.97~126 (2017), 민족어문학회
  8. Fuse, Montye P, "Asian American Autobiographers: A Bio-Biographical Critical Sourcebook", pp.159~164 (2001), Greenwood Press
  9. Han, Sergeï Mikhaïlovich, "고려사람 우리는 누구인가" (1999), Kodamsa
  10. 황영애, "백두산 가는 길" (1988), Kip’ŭnsaem
  11. 김흥섭, "순교자 作家 金恩國 교수의 북간도 報告", ~ (1987)
  12. 김 게르만, "나는 고려사람이다" (2013), Kukhak charyowŏn
  13. 김민환, "한국현대생활문화사 1980년대: 스포츠 공화국과 양념통닭", pp.151~174 (2016), Ch’angbi
  14. Kim, Richard E, "The Martyred" (1964), George Braziller
  15. Kim, Richard E, "Lost Names" (1970), Praeger Publishers
  16. 김려실, "<순교자> 다시 읽기: 번역과 각색의 문화적 맥락을 중심으로", 코기토, 72, pp.79~108 (2012), 인문학연구소[DOI]
  17. Kim Ŭnguk, "아버지나라 초청해줘요, 애끓는 당부", 조선일보, ~ (1988)
  18. Kim Ŭnguk, "환희의 눈물, 祖國에 바친 「아리랑」—내가 본 서울의 루드밀라南", 조선일보, ~ (1988)
  19. 김은국, "잃어버린 시간을 찾아서" (1985), Sŏmundang
  20. Kim Ŭnguk, "半世紀만의 滿洲 그리고 白頭山", 경향신문, ~ (1987)
  21. Kim Ŭnguk, "소련과 중국, 그리고 잃어버린 동족들" (1989), Ŭryu Munhwasa
  22. Klein, Christina, "Cold War Orientalism: Asia in the Middlebrow Imagination 1945-1961" (2003), University of California Press
  23. 구자황, "근대 교과서와 기행문 성립에 관한 연구 - 일제 강점기 조선어 교과서에 나타난 명승고적을 중심으로 -", 한민족어문학(구 영남어문학), (69), pp.83~113 (2015), 한민족어문학회
  24. Lee, Namhee, "The Making of Minjung : Democracy and the Politics of Representation in South Korea" (2007), Cornell University Press
  25. Lisle, Debbie, "The Global Politics of Contemporary Travel Writing" (2006), Cambridge University Press
  26. "美, 中共旅行 제한 全面解除", 경향신문, ~ (1971)
  27. 박성수, "斷絕 극복, 血脈 잇기 성공", 경향신문, ~ (1988)
  28. "비뚤어진 정의감이 숱한 참화 불렀다, 일요방담: 한국을 움직여 온 원로들의 TV대담", KBS, ~ (1986)
  29. Pratt, Mary L, "Imperial Eyes : Travel Writings and Transculturation" (1992), Routledge
  30. Said, Edward W, "Orientalism : Western Conceptions of the Orient" (1978), Routledge and Kegan Paul
  31. "蘇 볼쇼이오페라団 프리마돈나그녀는 韓國人이었다", 조선일보, ~ (1988)
  32. 송창섭, "이상한 형태의진리: 김은국의 「순교자」", 한국학연구, 10, pp.85~112 (1998)
  33. 서영채, "기원의 신화를 향해 가는 길: 최남선의 『백두산 근참기』", 한국근대문학연구, 12(12), pp.96~138 (2005), 한국근대문학회
  34. "순교자 12국서 출판", 경향신문, ~ (1964)
  35. "특집: 소련땅의 韓人을 찾아서", Chosŏn ilbo, ~ (1988)
  36. "특집 다큐멘터리「북간도」, 「백두산」 방영 싸고 진통", 동아일보, ~ (1987)
  37. 이상근, "러시아, 중앙아시아 이주 한인의 역사: 고난을 극복하여 희망을 성취하기위한 역사" (2010), Kukhak charyowŏn
  38. Zur, Dafna, "Translating and Transmediating Children’s Literature", pp.87~99 (2020), Springer Nature

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)