본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Medium- to Long-term Results of Strut Allografts Treating Periprosthetic Bone Defects

문경호|박준성
대한고관절학회 (The Korean Hip Society)|2018.03|Hip and Pelvis|제30권 제1호|pp. 23-28|DOI 10.5371/hp.2018.30.1.23

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

Periprosthetic fracturesHip replacement arthroplastyCortical strut allograft

초록

Purpose: We evaluated the medium- to long-term outcomes of cortical strut allografts used to treat periprosthetic bone defects to better understand the correlation between radiological and clinical outcomes. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed outcomes from 19 patients undergoing cortical strut allografts to treat periproshtetic bone defects from 2001 to 2015. The mean age at index operation was 59.4 years and the average follow-up period was 8.6 years. Surgeries were performed because of aseptic loosening (n=9), periprosthetic fractures (n=5), and infections (n=5). Each case was characterized and described in detail including the length of allograft and the union period; possible correlations between allograft length and detailed classification and union period was analyzed. Clinical evaluations included the Harris hip score and Kaplan-Meier survivorship. Results: In revision total hip arthroplasty (THA), the average length of allografts used in patients experiencing fractures was significantly longer than those with aseptic loosening or infection. Of the 19 cases, incorporation was observed in 18 cases (94.7%). The average time to incorporation was 21.2 months and the time to incorporation was not significantly different among the two groups (fracture vs. aseptic loosening or infection). No positive correlation was identified between the length of allograft and incorporation period or in the time to cortical strut allograft incorporation among Paprosky or Vancouver subgroups. Conclusion: Results of cortical strut allografts show excellent incorporation rates based on medium- to long-term follow-up. Cortical strut allografts may be considered useful for the treatment of femoral bone defects experienced during revision THA and following periprosthetic fracture.

Abstract

Purpose: We evaluated the medium- to long-term outcomes of cortical strut allografts used to treat periprosthetic bone defects to better understand the correlation between radiological and clinical outcomes. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed outcomes from 19 patients undergoing cortical strut allografts to treat periproshtetic bone defects from 2001 to 2015. The mean age at index operation was 59.4 years and the average follow-up period was 8.6 years. Surgeries were performed because of aseptic loosening (n=9), periprosthetic fractures (n=5), and infections (n=5). Each case was characterized and described in detail including the length of allograft and the union period; possible correlations between allograft length and detailed classification and union period was analyzed. Clinical evaluations included the Harris hip score and Kaplan-Meier survivorship. Results: In revision total hip arthroplasty (THA), the average length of allografts used in patients experiencing fractures was significantly longer than those with aseptic loosening or infection. Of the 19 cases, incorporation was observed in 18 cases (94.7%). The average time to incorporation was 21.2 months and the time to incorporation was not significantly different among the two groups (fracture vs. aseptic loosening or infection). No positive correlation was identified between the length of allograft and incorporation period or in the time to cortical strut allograft incorporation among Paprosky or Vancouver subgroups. Conclusion: Results of cortical strut allografts show excellent incorporation rates based on medium- to long-term follow-up. Cortical strut allografts may be considered useful for the treatment of femoral bone defects experienced during revision THA and following periprosthetic fracture.

참고문헌 (19)

  1. Kurtz S, "Prevalence of primary and revision total hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 1990 through 2002", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 87, pp.1487~1497 (2005)
  2. Kurtz SM, "Future clinical and economic impact of revision total hip and knee arthroplasty", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 89(Suppl 3), pp.144~151 (2007)
  3. Barden B, "Supportive strut grafts for diaphyseal bone defects in revision hip arthroplasty", Clin Orthop Relat Res, (387), pp.148~155 (2001)
  4. Gross AE, "The role of allografts in revision arthroplasty of the hip", Instr Course Lect, 51, pp.103~113 (2002)
  5. Head WC, "Results of onlay allografts", Clin Orthop Relat Res, (371), pp.108~112 (2000)
  6. Hamer AJ, "Histologic evidence of cortical allograft bone incorporation in revision hip surgery", J Arthroplasty, 12, pp.785~789 (1997)[DOI]
  7. Paprosky WG, "Femoral defect classification: clinical application", Orthop Rev, 19(Suppl 9), pp.9~15 (1990)
  8. Wang JW, "Periprosthetic fracture of the femur after hip arthroplasty: The clinical outcome using cortical strut allografts", J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong), 8, pp.27~31 (2000)
  9. Kligman M, "Cancellous and cortical morselized allograft in revision total hip replacement: A biomechanical study of implant stability", J Biomech, 36, pp.797~802 (2003)[DOI]
  10. Emerson RH Jr, "Cortical strut allografts in the reconstruction of the femur in revision total hip arthroplasty. A basic science and clinical study", Clin Orthop Relat Res, (285), pp.35~44 (1992)
  11. Head WC, "Onlay cortical allografting for the femur", Orthop Clin North Am, 29, pp.307~312 (1998)[DOI]
  12. Lim CT, "Cortical Strut Allograft Support of Modular Femoral Junctions During Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty", J Arthroplasty, 32, pp.1586~1592 (2017)[DOI]
  13. Gross AE, "Onlay cortical strut grafting in revision arthroplasty of the hip", J Arthroplasty, 18(3 Suppl 1), pp.104~106 (2003)[DOI]
  14. Head WC, "Proximal femoral allografts in revision total hip arthroplasty", Semin Arthroplasty, 4, pp.92~98 (1993)
  15. Barden B, "Strut allografts for failed treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures: good outcome in 13 patients", Acta Orthop Scand, 74, pp.146~153 (2003)[DOI]
  16. Schmidt AH, "Periprosthetic fractures of the femur", Orthop Clin North Am, 33, pp.143~152 (2002)[DOI]
  17. Engh CA, "Cementless total hip arthroplasty using the anatomic medullary locking stem. Results using a survivorship analysis", Clin Orthop Relat Res, (249), pp.141~158 (1989)
  18. Tomford WW, "A study of the clinical incidence of infection in the use of banked allograft bone", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 63, pp.244~248 (1981)[DOI]
  19. Berrey BH Jr, "Fractures of allografts. Frequency, treatment, and end-results", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 72, pp.825~833 (1990)[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

Management of Severe Bone Defects in Femoral Revision following Total Hip ArthroplastyLi Cao, Yicheng Li대한고관절학회 · Hip and Pelvis2024 · 제36권 제2호Mid-term Results of Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Modular Cementless Femoral Stems민병우, 예희욱, 이경재, 임경환, 장형규대한고관절학회 · Hip and Pelvis2015 · 제27권 제3호Acetabular Cup Revision Arthroplasty Using Morselized Impaction Allograft김태호, 이중명대한고관절학회 · Hip and Pelvis2018 · 제30권 제2호지주 동종골 이식술 및 광범위 미세 피복 대퇴스템을 이용한 고관절 재치환술김동후, 민병우, 배기철, 이경재, 조철현대한고관절학회 · Hip and Pelvis2010 · 제22권 제3호Outcomes of Surgical Treatment of Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures in Cementless Hip Arthroplasty김민욱, 박지훈, 이정호, 정영율대한고관절학회 · Hip and Pelvis2015 · 제27권 제3호Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Tantalum Augment in Patients with Paprosky III or IV Acetabular Bone Defects: A Minimum 2-year Follow Up Study정민, 김형주, 문영완, 박윤수, 임승재대한고관절학회 · Hip and Pelvis2016 · 제28권 제2호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)

How to Increase Your “Power”김지형pp. 1-4Prevalence of Cam Deformity with Associated Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome in Hip Joint Computed Tomography of Asymptomatic Adults김정택, 원예연, 한준, 원석형, 함명훈pp. 5-11Short-term Outcomes of Ceramic Coated Metal-on-Metal Large Head in Total Hip Replacement Arthroplasty고명섭, 이세원, 김광섭, 김원유pp. 12-17Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Ceramic-on-ceramic Bearing Surfaces: Long-term Assessment of Squeaking Sounds김상민, 정영율, 김민욱pp. 18-22Effectiveness of Endoscopic Sciatic Nerve Decompression for the Treatment of Deep Gluteal Syndrome함동훈, 정우철, 정대웅pp. 29-36
원문 보기