본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Feasibility of Personal Sound Amplification Products in Patients With Moderate Hearing Loss: A Pilot Study

1

조회

0

다운로드

7

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Objectives. This study was conducted to investigate the electroacoustic characteristics of personal sound amplification products (PSAPs), to identify whether PSAPs provide adequate gain and output for three common hearing loss (HL) configurations, and to compare the benefits of a representative PSAP (RPSAP) and a conventional hearing aid (HA) for clinical hearing outcomes as a pilot study. Methods. The study comprised three phases: electroacoustic analysis, simulated real-ear measurements (REMs), and clinical hearing experiments. Electroacoustic analysis and simulated REMs were performed for three basic PSAPs (BeethoSOL, EarJJang, and Geniesori2) and three high-end PSAPs (Hearing Able, Olive Smart Ear, and SoriIn) using the Aurical Hearing Instrument Test box with a 2-mL coupler. Four electroacoustic characteristics (maximum output sound pressure level at 90 dB SPL, frequency range, equivalent input noise, and total harmonic distortion) were investigated. By simulated REMs, appropriate levels of the six PSAPs for three common HL configurations (mild-to-moderate high-frequency HL, moderate to moderately severe sloping HL, and moderate flat HL) were determined. Clinical experiments compared the performance of RPSAP to HA, both of which were fitted by audiologists using REMs. Clinical experiments were administered using functional gain, a word recognition test, and the Korean version of the Hearing in Noise Test in six participants with bilateral moderate sensorineural HL. Results. The two high-end devices met all tolerances. One basic and two high-end PSAPs showed appropriate levels for three common HL configurations. In the clinical experiments, the RPSAP showed better performance than unaided, but slightly worse than HA under all test conditions. Conclusion. Certain PSAPs met all specified tolerances for electroacoustic analysis and approximated prescriptive targets in well-controlled laboratory conditions. The pilot clinical experiments explored the possibility that the RPSAP could serve as a hearing assistive device for patients with moderate HL.

Abstract

Objectives. This study was conducted to investigate the electroacoustic characteristics of personal sound amplification products (PSAPs), to identify whether PSAPs provide adequate gain and output for three common hearing loss (HL) configurations, and to compare the benefits of a representative PSAP (RPSAP) and a conventional hearing aid (HA) for clinical hearing outcomes as a pilot study. Methods. The study comprised three phases: electroacoustic analysis, simulated real-ear measurements (REMs), and clinical hearing experiments. Electroacoustic analysis and simulated REMs were performed for three basic PSAPs (BeethoSOL, EarJJang, and Geniesori2) and three high-end PSAPs (Hearing Able, Olive Smart Ear, and SoriIn) using the Aurical Hearing Instrument Test box with a 2-mL coupler. Four electroacoustic characteristics (maximum output sound pressure level at 90 dB SPL, frequency range, equivalent input noise, and total harmonic distortion) were investigated. By simulated REMs, appropriate levels of the six PSAPs for three common HL configurations (mild-to-moderate high-frequency HL, moderate to moderately severe sloping HL, and moderate flat HL) were determined. Clinical experiments compared the performance of RPSAP to HA, both of which were fitted by audiologists using REMs. Clinical experiments were administered using functional gain, a word recognition test, and the Korean version of the Hearing in Noise Test in six participants with bilateral moderate sensorineural HL. Results. The two high-end devices met all tolerances. One basic and two high-end PSAPs showed appropriate levels for three common HL configurations. In the clinical experiments, the RPSAP showed better performance than unaided, but slightly worse than HA under all test conditions. Conclusion. Certain PSAPs met all specified tolerances for electroacoustic analysis and approximated prescriptive targets in well-controlled laboratory conditions. The pilot clinical experiments explored the possibility that the RPSAP could serve as a hearing assistive device for patients with moderate HL.

참고문헌 (18)

  1. "Deafness and hearing loss" (2020)[URL]
  2. Loughrey DG, "Association of age-related hearing loss with cognitive function, cognitive impairment, and dementia : a systematic review and meta-analysis", JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 144(2), pp.115~126 (2018)
  3. Moon IJ, "Hearing aid use and associated factors in South Korea", Medicine(Baltimore), 94(42), pp.e1580~ (2015)
  4. Analysis of hearing aid benefit and barriers in hearing aid acquisition in Korea, "National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency (NECA)", NECA, ~, pp.NECA 2010-008 (2010)
  5. "Aging America & hearing loss: imperative of improved hearing technologies" (2015)[URL]
  6. Lin FR, "Time for a top-down approach to hearing aid affordability and accessibility", Am J Public Health, 108(2), pp.166~168 (2018)
  7. Brody L, "A comparison of personal sound amplification products and hearing aids in ecologically relevant test environments", Am J Audiol, 27(4), pp.581~593 (2018)
  8. Cho YS, "Clinical performance evaluation of a personal sound amplification product vs a basic hearing aid and a premium hearing aid", JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 145(6), pp.516~522 (2019)
  9. 최지은, "A Personal Sound Amplification Product Compared to a Basic Hearing Aid for Speech Intelligibility in Adults with Mild-to-Moderate Sensorineural Hearing Loss", Journal of Audiology & Otology, 24(2), pp.91~98 (2020), 대한청각학회[DOI]
  10. Callaway SL, "An electroacoustic analysis of over-the-counter hearing aids", Am J Audiol, 17(1), pp.14~24 (2008)
  11. Reed NS, "Pilot electroacoustic analyses of a sample of direct-to-consumer amplification products", Otol Neurotol, 38(6), pp.804~808 (2017)
  12. Lee JH., "Practical manual of hearing tests", pp.110~ (2017), Hakjisa
  13. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, "Guidelines for manual pure-tone threshold audiometry", American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, ~ (1977)
  14. Kim JS, "Development of Korean Standard Monosyllabic Word Lists for Adults(KS-MWL-A)", Audiology, 4(2), pp.126~140 (2008)
  15. Moon SK, "The Korean hearing in noise test", Int J Audiol, 47(6), pp.375~376 (2008)
  16. Chan ZY, "Over-the-counter hearing aids : a lost decade for change", Biomed Res Int, 2015, pp.827463~ (2015)
  17. Mamo SK, "Personal sound amplifiers for adults with hearing loss", Am J Med, 129(3), pp.245~250 (2016)
  18. Cheng CM, "Over-the-counter hearing aids : electroacoustic characteristics and possible target client groups", Audiology, 39(2), pp.110~116 (2000)

관련 논문AI추천

A Personal Sound Amplification Product Compared to a Basic Hearing Aid for Speech Intelligibility in Adults with Mild-to-Moderate Sensorineural Hearing Loss문일준, 윤성훈, 최지은, 홍성화, Jinryoul Kim대한청각학회 · Journal of Audiology & Otology2020 · 제24권 제2호Apple AirPods Pro as a Hearing Assistive Device in Patients with Mild to Moderate Hearing Loss김가영, 문일준, 윤희정, 조민이, 조서영, 조영상연세대학교의과대학 · Yonsei Medical Journal2024 · 제65권 제10호Practical Guidelines for Smartphone-Based Hearing Aid Application and Personal Sound Amplification Device Usage to Correct Hearing Loss in Korea Based on a Randomized Controlled Trial by the Patient-Centered Clinical Research Coordinating Center강명신, 문일준, 박용호, 서재현, 송재준, Park Moo Kyun대한청각학회 · Journal of Audiology & Otology2025 · 제29권 제4호Clinical Comparison of a Hearing Aid, a Personal Sound Amplification Product, and a Wearable Augmented Reality Device강수진, 김가영, 문일준, 설혜윤, 조미니, 조영상, 홍성화, Ul Gyu Han대한이비인후과학회 · Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology2021 · 제14권 제3호Outcomes of Direct-to-Consumer Hearing Devices for People with Hearing Loss: A ReviewNicole R. Tran, Vinaya Manchaiah대한청각학회 · Journal of Audiology & Otology2018 · 제22권 제4호Electroacoustic Evaluation of Smartphone-Based Hearing Aid Applications구미승, 박무균, 오승하, 이준호, Willy Nguyen대한이비인후과학회 · Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology2022 · 제15권 제2호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)