노스럽 프라이의 원형예표론적 성서해석에 대한 고찰
An Investigation on Northrop Frye’s Archetypological Interpretation of the Bible
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
One of the distinguished literary critics in the 20th century Northrop Frye is fully qualified to be remembered and positively reevaluated in the study of literature and religion. However, his literary world has not been adequately studied by Korean scholars and literary critics. For this reason the purpose of this paper is to introduce his literary world and examine it with the perspective of literary-biblical scholarship. The archetypal criticism has been regarded as his peculiar method for combining myth with proclamation(kerygma). According to him, the Bible is literature wearing the cloth of a sufficient metaphor. And in the Bible there are various mythic stories built in metaphor. In many cases myth reveals its own meaning in a form of typology. Typology is a manner of combination between archetype and antitype. The Old Testament is combined by typology with the New Testament. Frye pays attention to the importance of myth in the Bible in the atmosphere of depreciation of myth in the field of biblical studies, which was initiated by the biblical scholar R. Bultmann. His schematic framework stands on the archetypological interpretation of the Bible. Frye constantly negotiates Christian typology and mythic archetype. Also he enriches typology with patterns drawn from comparative anthropology. His archetypological interpretation surely widens our eyes to see the mythic wholeness and unity of the Bible. Of course there has been some criticisms of his insights and method. That is, his reading of the Bible through the archetypology revives a form of Christian supersessionism that detaches the Hebrew Scriptures from the shifting complications of their particular realizations. However, his academic achievements cannot be depreciated by few problems. As he quotes Bruno’s saying(Est aliquid prodisse tenus) in the introduction of the Great Code, it is great that he preceded to a certain extent in the study of literature and religion.
Abstract
One of the distinguished literary critics in the 20th century Northrop Frye is fully qualified to be remembered and positively reevaluated in the study of literature and religion. However, his literary world has not been adequately studied by Korean scholars and literary critics. For this reason the purpose of this paper is to introduce his literary world and examine it with the perspective of literary-biblical scholarship. The archetypal criticism has been regarded as his peculiar method for combining myth with proclamation(kerygma). According to him, the Bible is literature wearing the cloth of a sufficient metaphor. And in the Bible there are various mythic stories built in metaphor. In many cases myth reveals its own meaning in a form of typology. Typology is a manner of combination between archetype and antitype. The Old Testament is combined by typology with the New Testament. Frye pays attention to the importance of myth in the Bible in the atmosphere of depreciation of myth in the field of biblical studies, which was initiated by the biblical scholar R. Bultmann. His schematic framework stands on the archetypological interpretation of the Bible. Frye constantly negotiates Christian typology and mythic archetype. Also he enriches typology with patterns drawn from comparative anthropology. His archetypological interpretation surely widens our eyes to see the mythic wholeness and unity of the Bible. Of course there has been some criticisms of his insights and method. That is, his reading of the Bible through the archetypology revives a form of Christian supersessionism that detaches the Hebrew Scriptures from the shifting complications of their particular realizations. However, his academic achievements cannot be depreciated by few problems. As he quotes Bruno’s saying(Est aliquid prodisse tenus) in the introduction of the Great Code, it is great that he preceded to a certain extent in the study of literature and religion.
참고문헌 (22)
- 가블러, 요한 P, "성서신학과 교의신학 사이의 적절한 구별과 그들에게 있는 특수한 목표들에 관한 강연, In 20세기 구약신학의 주요 인물들", pp.708~721 (2000), 크리스찬다이제스트
- 강옥선, "블레이크의 예언 시에서 불의 이미지 읽기", 문학과 종교, 14(3), pp.193~212 (2009), 한국문학과종교학회
- 김명주, "문학의 위기와 노드롭 프라이의 문학적 상상력 옹호", 영어영문학, 45(2), pp.295~308 (1999)
- 남송우, "노드롭 프라이의 종교적 체험과 신성", 오늘의 문예비평, 22, pp.28~46 (1996)
- 임철규, "문학이 되어버린 비평, In 비평의 해부", pp.21~37 (2000), 한길사
- 프라이, 노드롭, "성서와 문학" (2000), 숭실대학교출판부
- 프루스너, 프레드릭 C, "구약성서신학사" (1991), 나눔사
- Alter, R., "Northrop Frye between Archetype and Typology", Semeia, 89, pp.9~21 (2002)
- Blake, William, "The Complete Poetry & Prose of William Blake, In Erdman and Bloom" (1988), Anchor Books
- Burgess, M., "From Archetype to Antitype: A Look at Frygian Archetypology", Semeia, 89, pp.103~124 (2002)
- Derrida, Jacques, "Of Grammatology. Trans. Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak" (1976), The Johns Hopkins UP
- Eliot, T. S., "Selected Essays" (1951), Faber and Faber
- Frye, N., "Anatomy of Criticism" (1957), Penguin Books
- Frye, N., "The Great Code: The Bible and Literature" (1982), Harcourt
- Frye, N., "Words with Power", pp.1990, A Harvest Book
- Frye, N., "The Koine of Myth: Myth as a Universally Intelligible Language, In Northrop Frye: Myth and Metaphor Selected Essays 1974-1988", pp.3~17 (2000), UP of Virginia
- Habershon, Ada R., "The Study of the Types" (1974), Kregel
- James, William, "The Varieties of Religious Experience: A Study in Human Nature" (1958), The New American Library of World Literature
- Kee, James M., "Northrop Frye and the Poetry in Biblical Hermeneutics", Semeia, 89(2002), pp.75~87 (2002)
- Marx, S., "Northrop Frye’s Bible", Journal of the American Academy of Religion, LXII(1), pp.163~171 (1994)
- Reventlow, H.G., "Problems of Biblical Theology in the Twentieth Century" (1986), Fortress
- Velaidum, J., "Towards Reconciling the Solitudes", Semeia, 89(2002), pp.23~37 (2002)