본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Improved Gait Speed After Robot-Assisted Gait Training in Patients With Motor Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury: A Preliminary Study

2

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류재활의학

초록

Objective To evaluate the clinical features that could serve as predictive factors for improvement in gait speed after robotic treatment.Methods A total of 29 patients with motor incomplete spinal cord injury received 4-week robot-assisted gait training (RAGT) on the Lokomat (Hocoma AG, Volketswil, Switzerland) for 30 minutes, once a day, 5 times a week, for a total of 20 sessions. All subjects were evaluated for general characteristics, the 10-Meter Walk Test (10MWT), the Lower Extremity Motor Score (LEMS), the Functional Ambulatory Category (FAC), the Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury version II (WISCI-II), the Berg Balance Scale (BBS), and the Spinal Cord Independence Measure version III (SCIM-III) every 0, and 4 weeks. After all the interventions, subjects were stratified using the 10MWT score at 4 weeks into improved group and non-improved group for statistical analysis.Results The improved group had younger age and shorter disease duration than the non-improved group. All subjects with the American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale level C (AIS-C) tetraplegia belonged to the non-improved group, while most subjects with AIS-C paraplegia, AIS-D tetraplegia, and AIS-D paraplegia belonged to the improved group. The improved group showed greater baseline lower extremity strength, balance, and daily living function than the non-improved group.Conclusion Assessment of SCIM-III, BBS, and trunk control, in addition to LEMS, have potential for predicting the effects of robotic treatment in patients with motor incomplete spinal cord injury.

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the clinical features that could serve as predictive factors for improvement in gait speed after robotic treatment.Methods A total of 29 patients with motor incomplete spinal cord injury received 4-week robot-assisted gait training (RAGT) on the Lokomat (Hocoma AG, Volketswil, Switzerland) for 30 minutes, once a day, 5 times a week, for a total of 20 sessions. All subjects were evaluated for general characteristics, the 10-Meter Walk Test (10MWT), the Lower Extremity Motor Score (LEMS), the Functional Ambulatory Category (FAC), the Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury version II (WISCI-II), the Berg Balance Scale (BBS), and the Spinal Cord Independence Measure version III (SCIM-III) every 0, and 4 weeks. After all the interventions, subjects were stratified using the 10MWT score at 4 weeks into improved group and non-improved group for statistical analysis.Results The improved group had younger age and shorter disease duration than the non-improved group. All subjects with the American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale level C (AIS-C) tetraplegia belonged to the non-improved group, while most subjects with AIS-C paraplegia, AIS-D tetraplegia, and AIS-D paraplegia belonged to the improved group. The improved group showed greater baseline lower extremity strength, balance, and daily living function than the non-improved group.Conclusion Assessment of SCIM-III, BBS, and trunk control, in addition to LEMS, have potential for predicting the effects of robotic treatment in patients with motor incomplete spinal cord injury.

참고문헌 (35)

  1. McKinley WO, "Long-term medical complications after traumatic spinal cord injury: a regional model systems analysis", Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 80, pp.1402~1410 (1999)
  2. Ditunno JF Jr, "Neurological and functional capacity outcome measures: essential to spinal cord injury clinical trials", J Rehabil Res Dev, 42, pp.35~41 (2005)
  3. Finch L, "Influence of body weight support on normal human gait: development of a gait retraining strategy", Phys Ther, 71, pp.842~855 (1991)
  4. Visintin M, "A new approach to retrain gait in stroke patients through body weight support and treadmill stimulation", Stroke, 29, pp.1122~1128 (1998)
  5. Schwartz I, "Locomotor training using a robotic device in patients with subacute spinal cord injury", Spinal Cord, 49, pp.1062~1067 (2011)
  6. Jezernik S, "Robotic orthosis lokomat : a rehabilitation and research tool", Neuromodulation, 6, pp.108~115 (2003)
  7. Hornby TG, "Robotic-assisted, body-weight-supported treadmill training in individuals following motor incomplete spinal cord injury", Phys Ther, 85, pp.52~66 (2005)
  8. Alcobendas-Maestro M, "Lokomat robotic-assisted versus overground training within 3 to 6 months of incomplete spinal cord lesion: randomized controlled trial", Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 26, pp.1058~1063 (2012)
  9. 신지철, "Effect of Robotic-Assisted Gait Training in Patients With Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury", Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine, 38(6), pp.719~725 (2014), 대한재활의학회
  10. Waters RL, "Prediction of ambulatory performance based on motor scores derived from standards of the American Spinal Injury Association", Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 75, pp.756~760 (1994)
  11. Zörner B, "Clinical algorithm for improved prediction of ambulation and patient stratification after incomplete spinal cord injury", J Neurotrauma, 27, pp.241~252 (2010)
  12. Curt A, "Ambulatory capacity in spinal cord injury:significance of somatosensory evoked potentials and ASIA protocol in predicting outcome", Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 78, pp.39~43 (1997)
  13. Wirz M, "Muscle force and gait performance: relationships after spinal cord injury", Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 87, pp.1218~1222 (2006)
  14. Shin JC, "Comparison of lower extremity motor score parameters for patients with motor incomplete spinal cord injury using gait parameters", Spinal Cord, 49, pp.529~533 (2011)
  15. Kirshblum SC, "International standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury (revised 2011)", J Spinal Cord Med, 34, pp.535~546 (2011)
  16. Lam T, "A systematic review of functional ambulation outcome measures in spinal cord injury", Spinal Cord, 46, pp.246~254 (2008)
  17. Holden MK, "Gait assessment for neurologically impaired patients. Standards for outcome assessment", Phys Ther, 66, pp.1530~1539 (1986)
  18. Dittuno PL, "Walking index for spinal cord injury (WISCI II): scale revision", Spinal Cord, 39, pp.654~656 (2001)
  19. Berg KO, "Measuring balance in the elderly: validation of an instrument", Can J Public Health, 83(Suppl 2), pp.S7~11 (1992)
  20. Catz A, "A multicenter international study on the Spinal Cord Independence Measure, version III: Rasch psychometric validation", Spinal Cord, 45, pp.275~291 (2007)
  21. Braddom RL, "Physical medicine and rehabilitation", pp.2010, Elsevier
  22. van Hedel HJ, "Assessing walking ability in subjects with spinal cord injury: validity and reliability of 3 walking tests", Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 86, pp.190~196 (2005)
  23. Podsiadlo D, "The timed “Up & Go”: a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons", J Am Geriatr Soc, 39, pp.142~148 (1991)
  24. Graham JE, "Assessing walking speed in clinical research: a systematic review", J Eval Clin Pract, 14, pp.552~562 (2008)
  25. Lemay JF, "Standing balance assessment in ASIA D paraplegic and tetraplegic participants: concurrent validity of the Berg Balance Scale", Spinal Cord, 48, pp.245~250 (2010)
  26. Geisler FH, "Recovery of motor function after spinal-cord injury: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial with GM-1 ganglioside", N Engl J Med, 324, pp.1829~1838 (1991)
  27. Burns SP, "Recovery of ambulation in motorincomplete tetraplegia", Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 78, pp.1169~1172 (1997)
  28. Scivoletto G, "Effects on age on spinal cord lesion patients’rehabilitation", Spinal Cord, 41, pp.457~464 (2003)
  29. Scivoletto G, "Who is going to walk? A review of the factors influencing walking recovery after spinal cord injury", Front Hum Neurosci, 8, pp.141~ (2014)
  30. Piepmeier JM, "Late neurological changes following traumatic spinal cord injury", J Neurosurg, 69, pp.399~402 (1988)
  31. Campagnolo DI, "Spinal cord medicine", pp.123~124 (2011), Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
  32. Scivoletto G, "Clinical factors that affect walking level and performance in chronic spinal cord lesion patients", Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 33, pp.259~264 (2008)
  33. Lemay JF, "Postural and dynamic balance while walking in adults with incomplete spinal cord injury", J Electromyogr Kinesiol, 24, pp.739~746 (2014)
  34. Chen CL, "The relationship between sitting stability and functional performance in patients with paraplegia", Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 84, pp.1276~1281 (2003)
  35. Morganti B, "Walking index for spinal cord injury (WISCI):criterion validation", Spinal Cord, 43, pp.27~33 (2005)

관련 논문AI추천

Effect of Robotic-Assisted Gait Training in Patients With Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury김나영, 김지용, 박한결, 신지철대한재활의학회 · Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine2014 · 제38권 제6호Robot-Assisted Gait Training in Individuals With Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled TrialsKim Yong Wook, Lee Su Ji, Park Jong Mi, Shin Ji Cheol대한재활의학회 · Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine2024 · 제48권 제3호Feasibility of Robot-Assisted Gait Training with an End-Effector Type Device for Various Neurologic Disorders이장우, Choi Soojin, Jeon Ha Ra, Kim Dong Yeong, Kim Seong Woo, Lee June Sung대한뇌신경재활학회 · 뇌신경재활2020 · 제13권 제1호Degree of Contribution of Motor and Sensory Scores to Predict Gait Ability in Patients With Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury김민영, 문진교, 민경훈, 유정훈, 최재우대한재활의학회 · Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine2017 · 제41권 제6호Energy Efficiency and Patient Satisfaction of Gait With Knee-Ankle-Foot Orthosis and Robot (ReWalk)-Assisted Gait in Patients With Spinal Cord InjuryBum Suk Lee, Eun Joo Kim, Hae Young Kim, Han Ram Pak, Hye Jin Lee, Hyun Ki Kim, Joo Hwan Jung, Jung Ah Lee, Sang Wook Oh, Seung Hyun Kwon, Sung Phil Yang, Tae Young Kim대한재활의학회 · Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine2020 · 제44권 제2호Changes of Functional Outcomes According to the Degree of Completeness of Spinal Cord Injury김명옥, 김효상, 정형준대한재활의학회 · Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine2014 · 제38권 제3호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (23건)