본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

노년 인구의 주거환경 평가도구에 관한 체계적 고찰

Systematic Review of Assessment Tools for the Housing Environment of the Old Adults Population

임영명
대한신경계작업치료학회 (Korean Society for Neurological Occupational Therapy)|2024.05|재활치료과학 (Therapeutic Science for Rehabilitation)|제13권 제2호|pp. 27-40

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

노인Systematic review체계적 고찰평가도구Livability주거환경Assessment tools거주 적합성계속 거주Aging-in-PlaceHousing environmentsOld adults

초록

목적: 본 연구 목적은 노년 인구의 주거환경을 평가하기 위해 사용된 평가도구들을 체계적 고찰하고자 하였다. 연구방법 : 자료수집은 2015년 1월부터 2023년 8월 31일까지 해외 데이터베이스 Cochranelibrary, Pubmed, Proquest를 검색하여 주제와 관련된 자료를 추출하였다. 주거환경 평가도구를 사용한 267편에서 원도구를 기준으로 최종 9개의 평가도구를 추출하였다. 분석은 최종 9개 평가도구의 사용 동향 및 빈도, 특성, 평가 범위, 타당도 및 신뢰도 여부 등을 체계적으로 분석하였다. 결과 : 총 9개 평가도구의 사용빈도는 HOME FAST, IPAQ-E가 각 20%로 많이 사용되었다. 원도구의 평가 목적은 친화성(AFCCQ, AFEAT, NEWS), 물리적 장벽(CHIEF, PENBOM), 낙상 예방(HOME FAST), 치매노인의 가정환경(HEAC), 신체활동에 관한 환경(IPAQ-E), 접근성(Walk Score®)으로 평가하고 있었다. 평가 범위는 고령친화도시(Age-Friendly Cities: AFC)의 8개 영역을 기준으로 AFCCQ, AFEAT, CHIEF는 8개 영역 모두를 평가하고 있었으며, 이외 NEWS (Full)는 3개, HOME FAST, IPAQ-E, Walk Score®는 2개 그리고 HEAC, NEWS (Abb), PENBOM는 1개 영역을 포함하고 있었다. 결론 : 노년기에 살던 곳에서 살고자 하는 계속 거주를 실현하기 위해 고려되는 주거환경을 평가할 때, 평가 목적과 범위의 적절성 그리고 논리적 타당성 여부를 판단할 수 있는 기초자료를 제시하고 있음에 의의가 있다.

Abstract

Objective : This study aimed to conduct a systematic review of the assessment tools used to assess the housing environment of older adults. Methods : Data were collected from January 2015 to August 31st, 2023, by searching databases including the Cochrane Library, PubMed, and ProQuest. From the 267 articles, nine assessment tools were selected for analysis based on their original instruments. These tools were categorized and systematically organized for analysis based on their frequency of use, assessment purposes, sub-domains, scales, and other relevant criteria. Results : Among the nine tools, HOME FAST and IPAQ-E were the most frequently used (20% each). The objectives of these tools are to assess friendliness, physical barriers, fall prevention, dementia-friendly environments, physical activity, and accessibility. The measurement scope encompassed various factors, such as outdoor spaces, buildings, transportation, housing, and community support. Conclusion : When considering the suitability of housing for the older adults population, providing foundational data for the rational selection of evaluation tools with logical validity is important. This includes factors such as the objectives and measurement scopes of housing environment assessment tools.

참고문헌 (43)

  1. Abdi, S., "Understanding the care and support needs of older people : A scoping review and categorisation using the WHO International Classification of Functioning, disability and health framework(ICF)", BMC Geriatrics, 19(1), pp.1~15 (2019)[DOI]
  2. Alexander, A., "IPAQ environmental module : Reliability testing", Journal of Public Health, 14, pp.76~80 (2006)[DOI]
  3. Baig, F., "Determining factors influencing residents’ satisfaction regarding urban livability in Pakistan", International Journal of Community Well-being, 2, pp.91~110 (2019)[DOI]
  4. Brivio, P., "From healthy aging to frailty : In search of the underlying mechanisms", Current Medicinal Chemistry, 26(20), pp.3685~3701 (2019)[DOI]
  5. Carlson, C., "Complexity in built environment, health, and destination walking : A neighborhood-scale analysis", Journal of Urban Health, 89, pp.270~284 (2012)[DOI]
  6. "Healthy places terminology: Aging in place" (2013)[URL]
  7. Chau, H. W., "Age-friendly built environment", Encyclopedia, 1(3), pp.781~791 (2021)[DOI]
  8. Choi, Y. J., "Understanding aging in place : Home and community features, perceived age-friendliness of community, and intention toward aging in place", Gerontologist, 62(1), pp.46~55 (2022)[DOI]
  9. Cronbach, L. J., "Construct validity in psychological tests", Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), pp.281~ (1955)[DOI]
  10. Dalmer, N. K., "A logic of choice : Problematizing the documentary reality of Canadian aging in place policies", Journal of Aging Studies, 48, pp.40~49 (2019)[DOI]
  11. Dikken, J., "How older people experience the age-friendliness of their city : Development of the age-friendly cities and communities questionnaire", International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(18), pp.6867~ (2020)[DOI]
  12. Emlet, C. A., "The importance of social connectedness in building age-friendly communities", Journal of Aging Research, 2012, pp.173247~ (2012)[DOI]
  13. Garner, I. W., "Age-friendliness of living environments from the older person’s viewpoint : Development of the Age-Friendly Environment Assessment Tool", Age and Ageing, 49(2), pp.193~198 (2020)[DOI]
  14. Gu, D., "Major trends in population growth around the world", China CDC Weekly, 3(28), pp.604~613 (2021)[DOI]
  15. Gobbens, R. J., "Cross-sectional and longitudinal associations of environmental factors with frailty and disability in older people", Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 85, pp.103901~ (2019)[DOI]
  16. "What is livable? Community preferences of older adults" (2014)[URL]
  17. Higgins, J. P. T, "Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions" (2023), John Wiley & Sons
  18. Joo, B. H., "The current status and challenges of housing support policy for the elderly with dementia", Health and Welfare Policy Forum, 276, pp.59~73 (2019)[DOI]
  19. Ju, Y. M., "Systematic review of home safety assessments for community-dwelling elderly", Journal of Korean Occupational Therapy, 28(3), pp.1~14 (2020)[DOI]
  20. Jung, K. H., "International trends in the establishment of age-friendly cities : Background and significance", Health and Welfare Policy Forum, 168, pp.102~112 (2010)
  21. Kamal, N. S. M., "Aging of the cells : Insight into cellular senescence and detection Methods", European Journal of Cell Biology, 99(6), pp.151108~ (2020)[DOI]
  22. Lehning, A. J., "Age-friendly environments and self-rated health : An exploration of Detroit elders", Research on Aging, 36(1), pp.72~94 (2014)[DOI]
  23. Lee, J. J., "Concept and measurement approach of research and development productivity", Science & Technology Policy, 6(8), pp.28~39 (1996)[DOI]
  24. Lewis, C., "Aging in place and the places of aging : A longitudinal study", Journal of Aging Studies, 54, pp.100870~ (2020)[DOI]
  25. Low, G., "Encyclopedia of gerontology and population aging", pp.284~289 (2021), Springer
  26. Mackenzie, L., "Designing the home falls and accidents screening tool(HOME FAST) : Selecting the items", British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 63(6), pp.260~269 (2000)[DOI]
  27. Peace, S., "‘Option recognition’ in later life : Variations in ageing in place", Ageing & Society, 31(5), pp.734~757 (2011)[DOI]
  28. Rantakokko, M., "Perceived environmental barriers to outdoor mobility and feelings of loneliness among community-dwelling older people", Journals of Gerontology Series A : Biomedical Sciences and Medical Sciences, 69(12), pp.1562~1568 (2014)[DOI]
  29. Rudnicka, E., "The World Health Organization(WHO)approach to healthy ageing", Maturitas, 139, pp.6~11 (2020)[DOI]
  30. Saelens, B. E., "Neighborhood-based differences in physical activity : An environment scale evaluation", American Journal of Public Health, 93(9), pp.1552~1558 (2003)[DOI]
  31. Seong, T. J., "Validity and reliability" (2002), Hakjisa
  32. Shank, K. S. H., "Processes of developing ‘community livability’ in older age", Journal of Aging Studies, 39, pp.66~72 (2016)[DOI]
  33. Steels, S., "Key characteristics of age-friendly cities and communities : A review", Cities, 47, pp.45~52 (2015)[DOI]
  34. Stephens, C., "Livable environments and the quality of life of older people : An ecological perspective", Gerontologist, 59(4), pp.675~685 (2019)[DOI]
  35. Tiraphat, S., "The role of age-friendly environments on quality of life among Thai older adults", International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14(3), pp.282~ (2017)[DOI]
  36. Torku, A., "Age-friendly cities and communities : A review and future directions", Ageing & Society, 41(10), pp.2242~2279 (2021)[DOI]
  37. Van Der Pas, S., "Features of home and neighbourhood and the liveability of older South Africans", European Journal of Ageing, 12(3), pp.215~227 (2015)[DOI]
  38. Van Hoof, J., "Ten questions concerning age-friendly cities and communities and the built environment", Building and Environment, 199, pp.107922~ (2021)[DOI]
  39. "Walk Score®: Drive less. Live more" (2013)[URL]
  40. Wang, Y., "Development and psychometrics test of home environment assessment checklist for community-dwelling older adults with dementia", Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, 77(4), pp.1389~1396 (2020)[DOI]
  41. Whiteneck, G. G., "Quantifying environmental factors : A measure of physical, attitudinal, service, productivity, and policy barriers", Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 85(8), pp.1324~1335 (2004)[DOI]
  42. "Global agefriendly cities: A guide" (2007)[URL]
  43. Zheng, Z., "Transfer of promotion effects on elderly health with age : From physical environment to interpersonal environment and social participation", International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(15), pp.2794~ (2019)[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

맞춤형 주거환경수정을 이용한 노인의 건강상태 차이비교 분석: 커뮤니티케어 사업을 중심으로한상우중소기업융합학회 · 융합정보논문지2021 · 제11권 제8호노인의 지역사회환경에 대한 체계적 문헌 고찰김현지, 도유희한국정치사회연구소 · 한국과 국제사회2025 · 제9권 제1호노후 임대아파트단지 리모델링을 통한 노인거주환경개선효과에 관한 연구강효진, 권순정, 김석준, 오가영한국의료복지건축학회 · 의료·복지 건축2017 · 제23권 제4호고령자 대상 사회적 건강 평가도구에 관한 체계적 고찰박지혁, 한예빈한국노인작업치료학회 · 한국노인작업치료학회지2023 · 제5권 제1호한글판 낙상 위험 주거환경 평가 (Home Falls and Accidents Screening Tool; HOME FAST)의 내용이해도 및 신뢰도 연구조선영, 주유미대한신경계작업치료학회 · 재활치료과학2019 · 제8권 제4호노년기 주거적절성과 돌봄 욕구 간 관계에 대한 탐색적 연구박상복, 송아영, 이지선, 이채윤, 바트사이한 아노 안드한국사회복지연구회 · 사회복지연구2025 · 제56권 제2호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)

자폐 스펙트럼 장애 섭식장애 평가의 이해: 문헌 고찰김보경, 민경철pp. 9-25청소년을 위한 연세 라이프스타일 프로파일(Yonsei Lifestyle Profile)의 신뢰도 및 타당도 연구박지혁, 임영명, 김아람pp. 41-51Identifying Common Daily Activities Performed by Older Adults in the United States and South Korea and Changes in Activity Participation Across the Adult Lifespan in South KoreaLisa Tabor, 박상미, 이예진pp. 53-67중고령 노인의 개인적 가치에 따른 라이프스타일 분류: 머신러닝을 활용한 상대적 중요도 분석박지혁, 임승주pp. 69-84성인 발달장애인 대상 수단적 일상생활활동 작업치료 프로그램이 일상생활활동 및 삶의 질에 미치는 영향정은화pp. 85-94
원문 보기