Efficacy of Systemic Postoperative Pulmonary Rehabilitation After Lung Resection Surgery
2
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objective To investigate the efficacy of systemic pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) after lung resection in patients with lung cancer.Methods Forty-one patients undergoing lung resection were enrolled and classified into the experimental (n=31) and control groups (n=10). The experimental group underwent post-operative systemic PR which was conducted 30 min/day on every hospitalization day by an expert physical therapist. The control group received the same education about the PR exercises and were encouraged to self-exercise without supervision of the physical therapist. The PR group was taught a self-PR program and feedback was provided regularly until 6 months after surgery. We conducted pulmonary function testing (PFT) and used a visual analog scale (VAS) to evaluate pain, and the modified Borg Dyspnea Scale (mBS) to measure perceived respiratory exertion shortly before and 2 weeks, 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery.Results A significant improvement on the VAS was observed in patients who received systemic PR >3 months. Significant improvements in forced vital capacity (FVC) and mBS score were observed in patients who received systemic PR >6 months (p<0.05). Other PFT results were not different compared with those in the control group.Conclusion Patients who received lung resection suffered a significant decline in functional reserve and increases in pain and subjective dyspnea deteriorating quality of life (QoL). Systemic PR supervised by a therapist helped improve reduced pulmonary FVC and QoL and minimized discomfort during the postoperative periods in patients who underwent lung resection.
Abstract
Objective To investigate the efficacy of systemic pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) after lung resection in patients with lung cancer.Methods Forty-one patients undergoing lung resection were enrolled and classified into the experimental (n=31) and control groups (n=10). The experimental group underwent post-operative systemic PR which was conducted 30 min/day on every hospitalization day by an expert physical therapist. The control group received the same education about the PR exercises and were encouraged to self-exercise without supervision of the physical therapist. The PR group was taught a self-PR program and feedback was provided regularly until 6 months after surgery. We conducted pulmonary function testing (PFT) and used a visual analog scale (VAS) to evaluate pain, and the modified Borg Dyspnea Scale (mBS) to measure perceived respiratory exertion shortly before and 2 weeks, 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery.Results A significant improvement on the VAS was observed in patients who received systemic PR >3 months. Significant improvements in forced vital capacity (FVC) and mBS score were observed in patients who received systemic PR >6 months (p<0.05). Other PFT results were not different compared with those in the control group.Conclusion Patients who received lung resection suffered a significant decline in functional reserve and increases in pain and subjective dyspnea deteriorating quality of life (QoL). Systemic PR supervised by a therapist helped improve reduced pulmonary FVC and QoL and minimized discomfort during the postoperative periods in patients who underwent lung resection.
참고문헌 (16)
- Derom E, "Pulmonary rehabilitation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease", Ann Readapt Med Phys, 50, pp.615~626 (2007)
- Bobbio A, "Preoperative pulmonary rehabilitation in patients undergoing lung resection for non-small cell lung cancer", Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 33, pp.95~98 (2008)
- Chetta A, "Assessment of breathlessness perception by Borg scale in asthmatic patients: reproducibility and applicability to different stimuli", J Asthma, 40, pp.323~329 (2003)
- Rochester CL., "Pulmonary rehabilitation for patients who undergo lung-volume-reduction surgery or lung transplantation", Respir Care, 53, pp.1196~1202 (2008)
- Pearson FG., "Current status of surgical resection for lung cancer", Chest, 106(6 Suppl), pp.337S~339S (1994)
- Lima LN, "Assessment of pulmonary function and quality of life in patients submitted to pulmonary resection for cancer", J Bras Pneumol, 35, pp.521~528 (2009)
- Manzano RM, "Chest physiotherapy during immediate postoperative period among patients undergoing upper abdominal surgery: randomized clinical trial", Sao Paulo Med J, 126, pp.269~273 (2008)
- Win T, "The effect of lung resection on pulmonary function and exercise capacity in lung cancer patients", Respir Care, 52, pp.720~726 (2007)
- Funakoshi Y, "Long-term pulmonary function after lobectomy for primary lung cancer", Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, 13, pp.311~315 (2005)
- Nomori H, "Respiratory muscle strength after lung resection with special reference to age and procedures of thoracotomy", Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 10, pp.352~358 (1996)
- Bott J, "Guidelines for the physiotherapy management of the adult, medical, spontaneously breathing patient", Thorax, 64(Suppl 1), pp.i1~i51 (2009)
- Hernandez Alava M, "The relationship between EQ-5D, HAQ and pain in patients with rheumatoid arthritis", Rheumatology (Oxford), 52, pp.944~950 (2013)
- Novoa N, "Influence of major pulmonary resection on postoperative daily ambulatory activity of the patients", Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg, 9, pp.934~938 (2009)
- Miyoshi S, "Exercise capacity of thoracotomy patients in the early postoperative period", Chest, 118, pp.384~390 (2000)
- Boshuizen RC, "Comparison of modified Borg scale and visual analog scale dyspnea scores in predicting re-intervention after drainage of malignant pleural effusion", Support Care Cancer, 21, pp.3109~3116 (2013)
- Sengul AT, "Postoperative lung volume change depending on the resected lobe", Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 61, pp.131~137 (2013)