본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Recasts in Meaning-based EFL Classrooms: Learner Uptake and Characteristics of Recasts

2

조회

0

다운로드

14

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

Recasts are widely known for simultaneously providing correction (negative evidence) and models (positive evidence). They supposedly provide juxtaposition between a correct form and an incorrect form, thereby encouraging noticing of gaps. Over the last decades, the field of second language acquisition (SLA) has benefited from the sheer amount of research that has been conducted on recasts. The studies reveal the positive but limited effects of recasts in second language (L2) development. In most studies, recasts are considered to be one entity, a form of implicit corrective feedback. However, given that recasts can take different forms and serve different discourse functions, it is not desirable to conceive them as one entity. Instead, recasts need to be treated in accordance with the diverse forms they take. The current study aims to investigate the different characteristics of recasts and their relationship with learner uptake in 13 EFL adult classrooms in Korea. This study reveals that the majority of recasts provided in the classroom target a single error in a declarative form, without topic continuity, and without prosodic emphasis on the targeted linguistic features. In addition, it proves that non-segmented recasts arise more frequently than segmented recasts. The rate of learner successful uptake relates to how recasts are provided. This, in turn, suggests that learner noticing of recasts can be dependent on the different forms that recasts take.

Abstract

Recasts are widely known for simultaneously providing correction (negative evidence) and models (positive evidence). They supposedly provide juxtaposition between a correct form and an incorrect form, thereby encouraging noticing of gaps. Over the last decades, the field of second language acquisition (SLA) has benefited from the sheer amount of research that has been conducted on recasts. The studies reveal the positive but limited effects of recasts in second language (L2) development. In most studies, recasts are considered to be one entity, a form of implicit corrective feedback. However, given that recasts can take different forms and serve different discourse functions, it is not desirable to conceive them as one entity. Instead, recasts need to be treated in accordance with the diverse forms they take. The current study aims to investigate the different characteristics of recasts and their relationship with learner uptake in 13 EFL adult classrooms in Korea. This study reveals that the majority of recasts provided in the classroom target a single error in a declarative form, without topic continuity, and without prosodic emphasis on the targeted linguistic features. In addition, it proves that non-segmented recasts arise more frequently than segmented recasts. The rate of learner successful uptake relates to how recasts are provided. This, in turn, suggests that learner noticing of recasts can be dependent on the different forms that recasts take.

참고문헌 (43)

  1. Baddeley, A, "When long-term learning depends on short term storage", Journal of Memory and Language, 27, pp.586~595 (1998)
  2. Bohannon, J. N, III, "The issue of negative evidence: Adultresponses to children’s language errors", Developmental Psychology, 24, pp.684~689 (1988)
  3. Chaudron,C, "A descriptive model of discourse in the corrective treatment of learners’ errors", Language Learning, 27, pp.29~46 (1977)
  4. Chaudron,C, "Second language classrooms: Research on teaching and learning" (1988), Cambridge University Press
  5. de Bot,K, "The psycholinguistics of the output hypothesis", Language Learning, 46, pp.529~555 (1996)
  6. Doughty,C, "Fine-tuning of feedback by competent speakers to language learners. In: Georgetown university round table on language and linguistics", pp.96~108 (1994), Georgetown University Press
  7. Doughty, C, "Communicative focus on form. In: Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition", pp.114~138 (1998), Cambridge University Press.
  8. Doughty, C, "Pedagogical choices in focus on form. In: Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition", pp.197~261 (1998), Cambridge University Press
  9. Egi,T, "Recasts, interpretations, and L2 development. In: Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A series of empirical studies", pp.249~267 (2007), Oxford University Press
  10. Ellis, R, "Leaner uptake in communicative ESL lessons", Language Learning, 51, pp.281~318 (2001)
  11. Ellis, R, "Reexamining the role of recasts in second language acquisition", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, pp.575~600 (2006)
  12. Fanselow,J, "The treatment of error in oral work", Foreign Language Annals, 10, pp.583~593 (1977)
  13. Farrar,M.J, "Negative evidence and grammatical morpheme acquisition", Developmental Psychology, 28, pp.90~98 (1992)
  14. Han,Z-H, "Rethinking of corrective feedback in communicative language teaching", RELC Journal, 33, pp.1~33 (2002)
  15. Han, Z. H, "Recasts: What teachers might want to know?", Language Learning Journal, 36, pp.35~44 (2008)
  16. Harley, B, "The interlanguage of immersion students and its implications for second language teaching. In: Interlanguage", pp.291~311 (1984), Edinburgh University Press
  17. Hosmer, D, "Applied logistic regression" (1989), Wiley.
  18. Kim, J.H, "Focus on form in communicative EFL classrooms: A study of learner recognition of recasts", 박사, pp.2008
  19. Kim, J. H, "Recasts in communicative EFL classes: Do teacher intent and learner interpretation overlap? In: Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A series of empirical studies", pp.269~297 (2007), Oxford Press
  20. Lightbown, P, "Focus on form and corrective feedback in communicative language teaching: Effect on second language learning", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, pp.429~448 (1990)
  21. Long,M.H, "Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. In: Foreign language research in cross cultural perspective", pp.39~52 (1991), John Benjamins
  22. Long,M.H, "The role of linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In: Handbook of second language acquisition", pp.413~468 (1996), Academic Press.
  23. Long,M.H, "Recasts in SLA: The story so far. In: Problems in SLA", pp.75~116 (2007), Lawrence Erlbaum
  24. Long, M. H, "The role of implicit negative feedback inSLA: Models and recasts in Japanese and Spanish", The Modern Language Journal, 82, pp.357~371 (1998)
  25. Long, M. H, "Focus on Form: Theory, research, and practice. In: Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition", pp.15~41 (1998), Cambridge University Press
  26. Loewen, S, "Recasts in the adult English L2 classroom: Characteristics,explicitness, and effectiveness", Modern Language Journal, 90, pp.536~556 (2006)
  27. Lyster,R, "Recasts, repetition, and ambiguity in L2 classroom discourse", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, pp.51~81 (1998)
  28. Lyster, R, "Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation Form in communicative classrooms", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, pp.37~66 (1997)
  29. Mackey,A, "Feedback,noticing,and instructed second language learning.Applied", Linguistics, 27, pp.405~430 (2006)
  30. Mackey, A, "How do learners perceive interactional feedback?", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, pp.471~497 (2000)
  31. Mackey, A, "Conversational interaction and second language development: recasts, responses, and red herrings?", The Modern Language Journal, 82, pp.338~356 (1998)
  32. Nabei, T, "Learner awareness of recasts in classroom interaction: A case study of an adult EFL student’s second language learning", Language Awareness, 11, pp.43~63 (2002)
  33. Netten,J, "Toward a more language oriented second language classroom. In: Language, culture and cognition", pp.284~304 (1991), Multilingual Matters
  34. Nicholas, H, "Recasts as feedback to language learner", Language Learning, 51, pp.719~758 (2001)
  35. Nobuyoshi, J, "Focused communication tasks and second language acquisition", English Language Teaching, 47, pp.203~210 (1993)
  36. Oliver,R, "Negative feedback in child NS-NNS conversation", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17, pp.459~481 (1995)
  37. Oliver,R, "Age difference in negotiation and feedback in classroom and pair work", Language Learning, 50, pp.119~151 (2000)
  38. Panova, I, "Patterns of corrective feedback and uptake in an adult ESL classroom", TESOL Quarterly, 36, pp.573~595 (2002)
  39. Philp,J, "Constraints on "noticing the gap": Non-native speakers’ noticing of recasts in NS-NNS interaction", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25, pp.99~126 (2003)
  40. Roberts,M, "Awareness and the efficacy of error correction. In: Attention and awareness in foreign language learning", pp.1~63 (1995), University of Hawaii Press
  41. Sheen,Y, "Corrective feedback and learner uptake in communicative classrooms across instructional settings", Language Teaching Research, 8, pp.263~300 (2004)
  42. Sheen,Y, "Exploring the relationship between characteristics of recasts and learner uptake", Language Teaching Research, 10, pp.361~392 (2006)
  43. Swain,M, "Three functions of output in second language learning. In: Principles and practice in the study of language: Studies in honour of H.G. Widdowson", pp.125~144 (1995), Oxford University Press

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)