본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

담화표지어 ‘그냥’에 대하여

박혜선
사단법인 한국언어학회 (The Linguistic Society of Korea)|2012.03|언어학 (EONEOHAG)|제20권 제1호|pp. 211-228|DOI 10.24303/lakdoi.2012.20.1.211

0

조회

0

다운로드

7

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

담화표지(discourse marker)kunyang상호작용(interactional)완화(mitigator)
주제분류언어학

초록

This paper examines the use and distribution of kunyang as a discourse marker in conversational Korean. A corpus of 58000 words constructed out of the Sejong Corpus was searched for the tokens of kunyang, and the meaning and function of each of the instances of kunyang were analyzed in light of the context it appeared in. A total of 231 tokens of kunyang were found, of which 50(21.6%) were adverbs and 171 discourse markers, with 10 unidentifiable ones. The functions of kunyang as a discourse marker include a mitigator, connective, emphasizer, filler, and hedge. The mitigator function, also evidenced in some adverbs and connectives, may have derived from the original meaning of kunyang, and conveys a speaker’s intention to minimize the importance of some particular event, situation or process, possibly employed as a politeness strategy. Analyses of kunyang in more diverse contexts and with aural data are needed to obtain a complete picture of its function and distribution as a discourse marker.

Abstract

This paper examines the use and distribution of kunyang as a discourse marker in conversational Korean. A corpus of 58000 words constructed out of the Sejong Corpus was searched for the tokens of kunyang, and the meaning and function of each of the instances of kunyang were analyzed in light of the context it appeared in. A total of 231 tokens of kunyang were found, of which 50(21.6%) were adverbs and 171 discourse markers, with 10 unidentifiable ones. The functions of kunyang as a discourse marker include a mitigator, connective, emphasizer, filler, and hedge. The mitigator function, also evidenced in some adverbs and connectives, may have derived from the original meaning of kunyang, and conveys a speaker’s intention to minimize the importance of some particular event, situation or process, possibly employed as a politeness strategy. Analyses of kunyang in more diverse contexts and with aural data are needed to obtain a complete picture of its function and distribution as a discourse marker.

참고문헌 (37)

  1. 구종남, "화용표지 ‘좀’에 대하여", 한국언어문학, 41, pp.411~434 (1998)
  2. 목정수, "좀’의 기능과 문법화", 언어학, 28, pp.77~100 (2001)
  3. 박혜선, "담화표지어 ‘좀’ 사용 연구: 중국인 한국어 학습자를 대상으로", 응용언어학, 27(1), pp.29~52 (2011), 한국응용언어학회
  4. 서상규, "부사의 통사적 기능과 부정의 해석", 한글, 186, pp.73~114 (1984)
  5. 손남익, "한국부사와 수식 대상", 한국어학, 4, pp.47~66 (1996)
  6. 손세모돌, "‘좀’의 상황적 의미", 한국학논집, 14, pp.477~506 (1989)
  7. 안의정, "말뭉치를 이용한 어휘의 구어성 측정과 활용", 어문논집, 57(57), pp.93~119 (2008), 민족어문학회
  8. 안주호, "축약형 담화표지 “좀", 막”에 대한 연구, 2009, pp.14(14), 199~223[DOI]
  9. 유진아, "말하기 학습자의 화용표지 사용 실태 및 지도 방안 연구 : 중학교 3학년, '자기소개 하기'를 중심으로", 석사, pp.2009
  10. 이원표, "담화분석: 방법론과 화용 및 사회언어학적 연구의 실례" (2001), 한국문화사
  11. 이정애, "국어 화용표지의 연구", 박사, pp.1999
  12. 이정애, "국어 화용표지의 연구" (2002), 도서출판 월인
  13. 이한규, "한국어 담화표지어 ‘예’의 의미", 현대문법연구, 65(65), pp.171~197 (2011), 현대문법학회
  14. 임유종, "부사의 수식범위와 성분통어", 한양어문, 16, pp.181~209 (1998)
  15. 전지은, "성별에 따른 한국어 부사 사용 양상: 세종 구어 말뭉치를 활용하여", 언어와언어학, 47(47), pp.191~218 (2010), 언어연구소
  16. 주경희, "대화에서의 ‘좀’의 기능", 국어국문학, 126, pp.75~99 (2000)
  17. 주경희, "‘좀’ 문법화의 의미 화용론적 연구", 국어교육, 115(115), pp.433~453 (2004), 한국어교육학회
  18. Kyungja Ahn, "A Discourse-Pragmatic Study of com in Korean.", 어학연구, 45(2), pp.257~281 (2009), 언어교육원
  19. Aijmer, K., "English discourse particles: Evidence from a corpus" (2002), John Benjamins
  20. Aijmer, K, "Just and multifunctionality, In Contexts-historical, social, linguistic: studies in celebration of Toril Swan", pp.31~47 (2005), Peter Lang AG
  21. Brinton, L., "Pragmatic markers in English: Grammaticalization and discourse functions" (1996), Mouton de Gruyter
  22. Brown, P, "Politeness: Some universals in language usage" (1987), Cambridge University Press
  23. Fischer, K, "Approaches to discourse particles" (2006), Elsevier
  24. Fraser, B, "What are discourse markers?", Journal of Pragmatics, 31, pp.931~952 (1999)
  25. Fraser, B., "Towards a theory of discourse markers, In Approaches to discourse particles", pp.189~203 (2006), Elsevier Ltd
  26. Fuller, J, "Discourse marker use across speech contexts: A comparison of native and non-native speaker performance", Multilingua, 22, pp.185~208 (2003)
  27. Halliday, M. A. K, "Cohesion in English" (1976), Longman
  28. Lee, D., "The semantics of just", Journal of Pragmatics, 11(3), pp.377~398 (1987)
  29. Lee, H-K., "The pragmatics and syntax of pragmatic morphemes in Korean", 박사, pp.1992
  30. Lindemann, S., "It’s just real messy: The occurrence and function of just in a corpus of academic speech", English for Specific Purposes, 20, pp.459~475 (2001)
  31. Maschler, Y., "Metalanguaging and discourse markers in bilingual conversation", Language in Society, 23, pp.325~366 (1994)
  32. Maschler, Y., "Metalanguage in interaction: Hebrew discourse markers" (2009), John Benjamins
  33. Müller, S, "Discourse markers in native and non-native English discourse" (2005), John Benjamins
  34. Schiffrin, D, "Discourse markers" (1987), Cambridge University Press
  35. Schiffrin, D, "Discourse marker research and theory: Revisiting and, In Approaches to discourse particles", pp.315~338 (2006), Elsevier Ltd
  36. Schourup, L. C, "Discourse markers", Lingua, 107, pp.227~265 (1999)
  37. 유경애, "The NSM-based Approach to a Korean Discourse Marker: jom", 담화와 인지, 15(1), pp.85~109 (2008), 담화·인지언어학회

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)

PP Arguments in Kiswahili Bantu and their Implications for Transitivity TheoryAssibiA.Amidupp. 1-30Some Notes on Grammatical Categories in English and Korean: A Functional Account최문홍pp. 31-62Reflecting Culture in EFL Classrooms: Students’ Perspectives정희정pp. 63-83The Online Processing of Ambiguous Sentences with a Focus Particle only김소영pp. 85-107Optimal Forms of Noun Phrases in Korean곽은주pp. 109-131
원문 보기