본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

把字句下位分类再思考

Rethinking on Subcategories of “Ba” Construction

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류중국어와문학

초록

On the basis of previous research, this paper divided “Ba” construction into 13 subcategories according to strict logic programs, which are having verbs or not, verbs being idioms or not, having several verbs or not, a single verb having no additional ingredients in front of and behind itself or not, and so on.The 13 subcategories are无动式、熟语式、复谓式、唯动式、状动式、动得式、动结式、动趋式、动副式、动介式、动宾式、动量式、动体式. As for naming the 13 subcategories, this paper haven’t adopted using Arabic numerals like 1, 2, 3 as Beijing Language Institute Sentence Type Research Group (1989) and Lv Wenhua (1994)did, and formula “v p = v r” as Cui Xiliang (1995) did, and codes like Ⅰa、Ⅰb as Xiao Xiqiang etc. (2009) did. We mainly followed Fan Xiao (2001). The 13 categories of “Ba” construction are fewer than Lv Wenhua (1994), more than Beijing Language Institute Sentence Type Research Group (1989), Cui Xiliang (1995), Fan Xiao(2001), Xiao Xiqiang etc.(2009). 9 out of the 13 categories have the same names as Fan Xiao (2001). Except adding 无动式、熟语式、复谓式,we changed Fan Xiao(2001)‘光杆动词把字句’(bare-verb “Ba” construction)into ‘唯动式把字句’(one-verb-predicate “Ba” construction )to make the name cleaner and be consistent with the others on the syllable to achieve a consistent effect. The references of “Ba” construction naming by Arabic numerals or Roman alphabet are difficult to memory, and by a formula are not simple enough. The best choice of naming “Ba” construction is using a Chinese phrase, which can have a brief form,and a clear reference.We would like to make such a classification and naming, mainly for the convenience of analysis of corpora and reading and writing. Our classification follows the strict logical principles, and the standards are very clear. According to our steps, any “Ba” construction appearing in a corpus can be easily classified into a proper subcategory.

Abstract

On the basis of previous research, this paper divided “Ba” construction into 13 subcategories according to strict logic programs, which are having verbs or not, verbs being idioms or not, having several verbs or not, a single verb having no additional ingredients in front of and behind itself or not, and so on.The 13 subcategories are无动式、熟语式、复谓式、唯动式、状动式、动得式、动结式、动趋式、动副式、动介式、动宾式、动量式、动体式. As for naming the 13 subcategories, this paper haven’t adopted using Arabic numerals like 1, 2, 3 as Beijing Language Institute Sentence Type Research Group (1989) and Lv Wenhua (1994)did, and formula “v p = v r” as Cui Xiliang (1995) did, and codes like Ⅰa、Ⅰb as Xiao Xiqiang etc. (2009) did. We mainly followed Fan Xiao (2001). The 13 categories of “Ba” construction are fewer than Lv Wenhua (1994), more than Beijing Language Institute Sentence Type Research Group (1989), Cui Xiliang (1995), Fan Xiao(2001), Xiao Xiqiang etc.(2009). 9 out of the 13 categories have the same names as Fan Xiao (2001). Except adding 无动式、熟语式、复谓式,we changed Fan Xiao(2001)‘光杆动词把字句’(bare-verb “Ba” construction)into ‘唯动式把字句’(one-verb-predicate “Ba” construction )to make the name cleaner and be consistent with the others on the syllable to achieve a consistent effect. The references of “Ba” construction naming by Arabic numerals or Roman alphabet are difficult to memory, and by a formula are not simple enough. The best choice of naming “Ba” construction is using a Chinese phrase, which can have a brief form,and a clear reference.We would like to make such a classification and naming, mainly for the convenience of analysis of corpora and reading and writing. Our classification follows the strict logical principles, and the standards are very clear. According to our steps, any “Ba” construction appearing in a corpus can be easily classified into a proper subcategory.

참고문헌 (14)

  1. 北京语言学院句型研究小组, "现代汉语基本句型", 世界汉语教学, 1 (1989), 世界汉语教学学会
  2. 陈昌来, "介词与介引功能" (2002), 安徽教育出版社
  3. 崔希亮, "“把”字句的若干句法语义问题", 世界汉语教学, 3 (1995), 世界汉语教学学会
  4. 范晓, "动词的配价与汉语的把字句", 中国语文, 4 (2001), 中国语文 编辑部
  5. 蒋平, "是无动把字句还是一种行事句", 中国语文, 5 (2003), 中国语文 编辑部
  6. 李英, "“把”字句语法项目的选取与排序研究", 语言教学与研究, 3 (2005), 语言教学与研究 编辑部
  7. 吕文华, "“把”字句的语义类型", 汉语学习, 4 (1994), 汉语学习 编辑部
  8. 聂剑, "“把”字句语篇功能研究", 석사, pp.2014
  9. 邵敬敏, "“动+ 介+ 宾”结构的语义模式及认知场景", 语言教学与研究, 3 (2008), 语言教学与研究 编辑部
  10. 陶红印, "从语体差异到语法差异(上)——以自然会话与影视对白中的把字 句、被动结构、光杆动词句、否定反问句为例", 当代修辞学, 1 (2010), 当代修辞学 编辑部
  11. 王 惠, "“把”字句中的“着", 了, 汉语学习, pp.1993, 1[DOI]
  12. 王文晖, "近代汉语中的一种特殊把字句", 中国语文, 4 (2001), 中国语文 编辑部
  13. 王政红, "“把”字句情状类型及其语法特征", 南京师大学报, 4 (1994), 南京师 大学报 编辑部
  14. 肖奚强, "外国学生习得汉语句式难度分级及排序研究" (2009), 高等教育出版社

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (20건)