본문 바로가기
KERD
논문

Korean Classifiers Competing to Influence Categorization

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

Kang, Sang-Gu. 2020. Korean classifiers competing to influence categorization. Korean Journal of Linguistics, 45-2, 205-222. The purpose of this paper is to probe whether classifiers in Korean can influence the way its speakers categorize real world referents. Korean is a classifier language that mandates the use of classifiers when counting. Three sets of survey asking the participants to categorize objects were administered to a group of university students in Korea. The first set involved singular objects, while the other two sets involved multiple appearance of the same objects to activate classifiers for counting. The only difference between the second and the third set was that a pretest requiring the participants to write the result of their counting and calculation was administered in the third set. The results suggest that categorization of the second and third group was influenced by the classifiers they used when counting in the Korean language. Significant additional influence of the pretest in the third set was not found, but there is at least one participant demonstrating the effect. The results can be accounted for in terms of the potential competition between the semantic association among objects in the real world and common properties that allow objects to share a classifier. (Cheongju University)

Abstract

Kang, Sang-Gu. 2020. Korean classifiers competing to influence categorization. Korean Journal of Linguistics, 45-2, 205-222. The purpose of this paper is to probe whether classifiers in Korean can influence the way its speakers categorize real world referents. Korean is a classifier language that mandates the use of classifiers when counting. Three sets of survey asking the participants to categorize objects were administered to a group of university students in Korea. The first set involved singular objects, while the other two sets involved multiple appearance of the same objects to activate classifiers for counting. The only difference between the second and the third set was that a pretest requiring the participants to write the result of their counting and calculation was administered in the third set. The results suggest that categorization of the second and third group was influenced by the classifiers they used when counting in the Korean language. Significant additional influence of the pretest in the third set was not found, but there is at least one participant demonstrating the effect. The results can be accounted for in terms of the potential competition between the semantic association among objects in the real world and common properties that allow objects to share a classifier. (Cheongju University)

참고문헌 (18)

  1. Athanasopoulos, Panos, "Language and Thought in Bilinguals: The Case of Grammatical Number and Nonverbal Classification Preferences", Applied Linguistics, 29(1), pp.105~123 (2008)
  2. Bowerman, Melissa, "Language in Mind: Advances in the Study of Language and Thought", pp.387~428 (2003), MIT Press
  3. Choi, Soonja, "Learning to Express Motion Events in English and Korean: The Influence of Language-specific Lexicalization Patterns", Cognition, 41, pp.83~121 (1991)
  4. Choi, Soonja, "Early Sensitivity to Language-specific Spatial Categories in English and Korean", Cognitive Development, 14(2), pp.241~268 (1999)
  5. Cook, Vivian, "Do Bilinguals Have Different Concepts? The Case of Shape and Material in Japanese L2 users of English", International Journal of Bilingualism, 10(2), pp.137~152 (2006)
  6. Davidoff, Jules, "Colour Categories in a Stone-age Tribe", Nature, 398, pp.203~204 (1999)
  7. 김영화, "The Syntax of the Plural Marker -tul and Classifiers in Korean", 언어, 34(4), pp.829~852 (2009), 한국언어학회[DOI]
  8. 곽은주, "A Lexical Approach to the Semantics of Classifiers", 언어, 37(1), pp.25~45 (2012), 한국언어학회[DOI]
  9. Levinson, Stephen, "Language and Space", pp.109~169 (1999), MIT Press
  10. Lucy, John A, "Grammatical Categories and Cognition: A Case Study of the Linguistic Relativity Hypothesis" (1992), Cambridge University Press
  11. Lucy, John A, "Language in Mind: Advances in the Study of Language and Thought", pp.465~492 (2003), MIT Press
  12. Martinez, Ivelisse, "Linguistic Influence on Categorization in Preschool Children: A Cross-linguistic Study", Journal of Child Language, 23(3), pp.529~545 (1996)
  13. Miles, Lynden K, "Moving Through Time", Psychological Science, 21(2), pp.222~223 (2010)
  14. Miles, Lynden K, "Can a Mind Have Two Time Lines? Exploring Space-time Mapping in Mandarin and English Speakers", Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, pp.598~604 (2011)
  15. Sera, Maria D, "When Language Affects Cognition and When It Does Not: An Analysis of Grammatical Gender and Classification", Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131(3), pp.377~397 (2002)
  16. Unterbeck, Barbara, "Theoretical Issues in Korean Linguistics", pp.367~385 (1994), CSLI Publications
  17. Vigliocco, Gabriella, "Grammatical Gender Effects on Cognition: Implications for Language Learning and Language Use", Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134(4), pp.501~520 (2005)
  18. Whorf, Benjamin L, "Language, Thought, and Reality: Selected Writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf" (1956), MIT Press

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)