Particle Filtration Efficiency Testing of Sterilization Wrap Masks
3
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objectives: Non-traditional materials are used for mask construction to address personal protective equipment shortages during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Reusable masks made from surgical sterilization wrap represent such an innovative approach with social media frequently referring to them as “N95 alternatives.” This material was tested for particle filtration efficiency and breathability to clarify what role they might have in infection prevention and control. Methods: A heavyweight, double layer sterilization wrap was tested when new and after 2, 4, 6, and 10 autoclave sterilizing cycles and compared with an approved N95 respirator and a surgical mask via testing procedures using a sodium chloride aerosol for N95 efficiency testing similar to 42 CFR 84.181. Pressure testing to indicate breathability was also conducted. Results: The particle filtration efficiency for the sterilization wrap ranged between 58% to 66%, with similar performance when new and after sterilizing cycles. The N95 respirator and surgical mask performed at 95% and 68% respectively. Pressure drops for the sterilization wrap, N95 and surgical mask were 10.4 mmH2O, 5.9 mmH2O, and 5.1 mmH2O, respectively, well below the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health limits of 35 mmH2O during initial inhalation and 25 mmH2O during initial exhalation. Conclusions: The sterilization wrap’s particle filtration efficiency is much lower than a N95 respirator, but falls within the range of a surgical mask, with acceptable breathability. Performance testing of non-traditional mask materials is crucial to determine potential protection efficacy and for correcting misinterpretation propagated through popular media.
Abstract
Objectives: Non-traditional materials are used for mask construction to address personal protective equipment shortages during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Reusable masks made from surgical sterilization wrap represent such an innovative approach with social media frequently referring to them as “N95 alternatives.” This material was tested for particle filtration efficiency and breathability to clarify what role they might have in infection prevention and control. Methods: A heavyweight, double layer sterilization wrap was tested when new and after 2, 4, 6, and 10 autoclave sterilizing cycles and compared with an approved N95 respirator and a surgical mask via testing procedures using a sodium chloride aerosol for N95 efficiency testing similar to 42 CFR 84.181. Pressure testing to indicate breathability was also conducted. Results: The particle filtration efficiency for the sterilization wrap ranged between 58% to 66%, with similar performance when new and after sterilizing cycles. The N95 respirator and surgical mask performed at 95% and 68% respectively. Pressure drops for the sterilization wrap, N95 and surgical mask were 10.4 mmH2O, 5.9 mmH2O, and 5.1 mmH2O, respectively, well below the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health limits of 35 mmH2O during initial inhalation and 25 mmH2O during initial exhalation. Conclusions: The sterilization wrap’s particle filtration efficiency is much lower than a N95 respirator, but falls within the range of a surgical mask, with acceptable breathability. Performance testing of non-traditional mask materials is crucial to determine potential protection efficacy and for correcting misinterpretation propagated through popular media.
참고문헌 (18)
- "OSHA factsheet: healthcare workplaces classified as very high or high exposure risk for pandemic influenza"[URL]
- "Mask alternative" (2020)[URL]
- Samia Tasnim, "Impact of Rumors and Misinformation on COVID-19 in Social Media", 예방의학회지, 53(3), pp.171~174 (2020), 대한예방의학회[DOI]
- "An introduction into SMS material"[URL]
- "Unified Patents. US-5635134-A - method of sterilizing an article"[URL]
- Juang PS, "N95 respirator cleaning and reuse methods proposed by the inventor of the N95 mask material", J Emerg Med, 58(5), pp.817~820 (2020)
- Qian Y, "Performance of N95 respirators : filtration efficiency for airborne microbial and inert particles", Am Ind Hyg Assoc J, 59(2), pp.128~132 (1998)
- Bałazy A, "Manikin-based performance evaluation of N95 filtering-facepiece respirators challenged with nanoparticles", Ann Occup Hyg, 50(3), pp.259~269 (2006)
- "42 CFR 84.181- non-powered air-purifying particulate filter efficiency level determination"[URL]
- "Bacterial filtration efficiency: Kimguard One-Step* sterilization wrap compared to medline Gemini sterilization wrap"[URL]
- "Recognized Consensus Standards: ASTM F2101-19 standard test method for evaluating the bacterial filtration efficiency (BFE) of medical face mask materials, using a biological aerosol of Staphylococcus aureus"[URL]
- "Fit testing procedures (mandatory)"[URL]
- "Better care deserves a new package design"[URL]
- Oberg T, "Surgical mask filter and fit performance", Am J Infect Control, 36(4), pp.276~282 (2008)
- Davidson CS, "Performance evaluation of selected N95 respirators and surgical masks when challenged with aerosolized endospores and inert particles", J Occup Environ Hyg, 10(9), pp.461~467 (2013)
- "N95 respirators, surgical masks, and face masks"[URL]
- "42 CFR 84.180 airflow resistance tests"[URL]
- Janssen LL, "Interpretation of inhalation airflow measurements for respirator design and testing", J Int Soc Respir Prot, 22(3, pp.4) (2005), 122~