Secondary Benefits of Manipulation Checks: Three Illustrations From Behavioral Public Administration

키워드

참고문헌 (41)

1. Anna A. Amirkhanyan, "Liberté, Égalité, Crédibilité: An experimental study of citizens' perceptions of government responses to <scp>COVID<", scp>‐19 in eight countries, 2023, pp.83(2), 401~418[DOI]
2. An, S., "When the Plane Crashes: Contracting and Blame Avoidance for Failures", ~ (2021)
3. Angrist, J. D., "Identification and estimation of local average treatment effects" (1995), National Bureau of Economic Research
4. Bachrach, D. G., "Rigor in behavioral experiments : A basic primer for supply chain management researchers", Journal of Supply Chain Management, 47(3), pp.5~8 (2011)
5. Bellé, N., "Experimental evidence on the relationship between public service motivation and job performance", Public Administration Review, 73(1), pp.143~153 (2013)
6. Avner Ben-Ner, "Does Ownership Matter in the Selection of Service Providers? Evidence From Nursing Home Consumer Surveys", Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 47(6), pp.1271~1295 (2018), SAGE Publications[DOI]
7. Adam J. Berinsky, "Evaluating Online Labor Markets for Experimental Research: Amazon.com's Mechanical Turk", Political Analysis, 20(3), pp.351~368 (2012), Cambridge University Press (CUP)[DOI]
8. Buhrmester, M., "Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality data?", Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(1), pp.3~5 (2011)[DOI]
9. 제시 캠벨, "Public Participation and Trust in Government: Results From a Vignette Experiment", Journal of Policy Studies, 38(2), pp.23~31 (2023), 서울대학교행정대학원[DOI]
10. Krista Casler, "Separate but equal? A comparison of participants and data gathered via Amazon’s MTurk, social media, and face-to-face behavioral testing", Computers in Human Behavior, 29(6), pp.2156~2160 (2013), Elsevier BV[DOI]
11. Emma Ejelöv, "“Rarely safe to assume”: Evaluating the use and interpretation of manipulation checks in experimental social psychology", Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 87, pp.103937~ (2020), Elsevier BV[DOI]
12. Marie-Pierre Fayant, "On the Limitations of Manipulation Checks: An Obstacle Toward Cumulative Science", International Review of Social Psychology, 30(1), pp.125~ (2017), Ubiquity Press, Ltd.[DOI]
13. Festinger, L., "Research Methods in the Behavioral Sciences", pp.136~172 (1953), Dryden Press
14. Andriati Fitriningrum, "GOVERNMENT, STATE-OWNED ENTERPRISE, and LIBERALIZATION of UNIVERSAL POSTAL OBLIGATION SERVICES", Journal of Policy Studies, 38(3), pp.25~40 (2023), 서울대학교행정대학원[DOI]
15. Flake, J. K., "Construct validation in social and personality research : Current practice and recommendations", Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(4), pp.370~378 (2017)
16. Kendall Funk, "If the shoe fits: Gender role congruity and evaluations of public managers", Journal of Behavioral Public Administration, 2(1) (2019), Center for Experimental and Behavioral Public Administration[DOI]
17. Brian J. Gaines, "The Logic of the Survey Experiment Reexamined", Political Analysis, 15(1), pp.1~20 (2007), Cambridge University Press (CUP)[DOI]
18. Anil Kumar Gupta, "Service Users’ Confidence in Accessing Public Services in Nepal: What Makes Differences?", Journal of Policy Studies, 38(1), pp.29~43 (2023), 서울대학교행정대학원[DOI]
19. Hauser, D. J., "Are manipulation checks necessary?", Frontiers in Psychology, 9, pp.998~ (2018)[DOI]
20. David J. Hauser, "Attentive Turkers: MTurk participants perform better on online attention checks than do subject pool participants", Behavior Research Methods, 48(1), pp.400~407 (2015), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
21. Highhouse, S., "Designing experiments that generalize", Organizational Research Methods, 12(3), pp.554~566 (2009)
22. Ulrik Hvidman, "Perceptions of Public and Private Performance: Evidence from a Survey Experiment", Public Administration Review, 76(1), pp.111~120 (2015), Wiley[DOI]
23. James, O., "Behavioral public performance : How people make sense of government metrics" (2020), Cambridge University Press
24. John, P., "How far to nudge?: assessing behavioural public policy" (2018), Edward Elgar Publishing
25. Austin P. Johnson, "Can Hierarchy Dodge Bullets? Examining Blame Attribution in Military Contracting", Journal of Conflict Resolution, 63(8), pp.1965~1985 (2019), SAGE Publications[DOI]
26. Joanna N. Lahey, "Computerizing audit studies", Journal of Economic Behavior &amp; Organization, 70(3), pp.508~514 (2009), Elsevier BV[DOI]
27. Marvel, J. D., "Unconscious bias in citizens’ evaluations of public sector performance", Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 26(1), pp.143~158 (2016)
28. Kenneth J. Meier, "Sector bias in public programs: US nonprofit hospitals", Journal of Behavioral Public Administration, 3(1) (2020), Center for Experimental and Behavioral Public Administration[DOI]
29. Meier, K. J., "Sector bias and the credibility of performance information : An experimental study of elder care provision", Public Administration Review, 82(1), pp.69~82 (2022)
30. Ismael Mourifié, "Testing Local Average Treatment Effect Assumptions", The Review of Economics and Statistics, 99(2), pp.305~313 (2017), MIT Press - Journals[DOI]
31. Mutz, D. C., "Population-based survey experiments" (2011), Princeton University Press
32. Mutz, D. C., "Standards for experimental research : Encouraging a better understanding of experimental methods", Journal of Experimental Political Science, 2(2), pp.192~215 (2015)
33. 오민지, "Loyal to the Public: Examining the Relationship Between Chief Executives and the Pursuit of Public Values in Quangos", Journal of Policy Studies, 38(1), pp.1~14 (2023), 서울대학교행정대학원[DOI]
34. Byron D’Andra Orey, "Black and Blue: Black Police Officers’ Implicit and Explicit Biases in Split-Second Decisions to Shoot or Not to Shoot Unarmed Black Civilians", Journal of Policy Studies, 38(3), pp.1~13 (2023), 서울대학교행정대학원[DOI]
35. Niels Bjørn G Petersen, "Whoever Has Will be Given More: The Effect of Performance Information on Frontline Employees’ Support for Managerial Policy Initiatives", Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 30(4), pp.533~547 (2020), Oxford University Press (OUP)[DOI]
36. Jaclyn Piatak, "Bureaucratic accountability in third‐party governance: Experimental evidence of blame attribution during times of budgetary crisis", Public Administration, 95(4), pp.976~989 (2017), Wiley[DOI]
37. Hal G. Rainey, "Comparing Public and Private Organizations", Public Administration Review, 36(2), pp.233~ (1976), JSTOR[DOI]
38. Norma M. Riccucci, "Representative Bureaucracy in Policing: Does It Increase Perceived Legitimacy?", Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24(3), pp.537~551 (2014), Oxford University Press (OUP)[DOI]
39. Roethlisberger, F. J., "Management and the Worker" (1939), Harvard University Press
40. Using Facebook as a subject recruitment tool for survey-experimental research, "Samuels, D. J.", ~ (2013)
41. Simon, H. A., "Administrative behavior" (1947), The Free Press

관련 논문AI추천