본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

What are the most important prognostic factors in patients with residual rectal cancer after preoperative chemoradiotherapy?

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류의학일반

초록

Background: We aimed to establish robust histoprognostic predictors on residual rectal cancer after preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Methods: Analyzing known histoprognostic factors in 146 patients with residual disease allows associations with patient outcome to be evaluated. Results: The median follow-up time was 77.8 months, during which 59 patients (40.4%) experienced recurrence and 41 (28.1%) died of rectal cancer. On univariate analysis, residual tumor size, ypT category, ypN category, ypTNM stage, downstage, tumor regression grade, lymphatic invasion, perineural invasion, venous invasion, and circumferential resection margin (CRM) were significantly associated with recurrence free survival (RFS) or/and cancer-specific survival (CSS) (all p<0.005). On multivariate analysis, higher ypTNM stage and CRM positivity were identified as independent prognostic factors for RFS (ypTNM stage, p=0.024; CRM positivity, p<0.001) and CSS (p=0.022, p=0.017, respectively). Furthermore, CRM positivity was an independent predictor of reduced RFS and CSS, irrespective of subgrouping according to downstage (non-downstage, p<0.001 and p<0.001; downstage, p=0.002 and p=0.002) or lymph node metastasis (non-metastasis, p<0.001 and p=0.001; metastasis, p<0.001 and p<0.001). Conclusion: CRM status may be as powerful as ypTNM stage as a prognostic indicator for patient outcome in patients with residual rectal cancer after preoperative CRT.

Abstract

Background: We aimed to establish robust histoprognostic predictors on residual rectal cancer after preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Methods: Analyzing known histoprognostic factors in 146 patients with residual disease allows associations with patient outcome to be evaluated. Results: The median follow-up time was 77.8 months, during which 59 patients (40.4%) experienced recurrence and 41 (28.1%) died of rectal cancer. On univariate analysis, residual tumor size, ypT category, ypN category, ypTNM stage, downstage, tumor regression grade, lymphatic invasion, perineural invasion, venous invasion, and circumferential resection margin (CRM) were significantly associated with recurrence free survival (RFS) or/and cancer-specific survival (CSS) (all p<0.005). On multivariate analysis, higher ypTNM stage and CRM positivity were identified as independent prognostic factors for RFS (ypTNM stage, p=0.024; CRM positivity, p<0.001) and CSS (p=0.022, p=0.017, respectively). Furthermore, CRM positivity was an independent predictor of reduced RFS and CSS, irrespective of subgrouping according to downstage (non-downstage, p<0.001 and p<0.001; downstage, p=0.002 and p=0.002) or lymph node metastasis (non-metastasis, p<0.001 and p=0.001; metastasis, p<0.001 and p<0.001). Conclusion: CRM status may be as powerful as ypTNM stage as a prognostic indicator for patient outcome in patients with residual rectal cancer after preoperative CRT.

참고문헌 (29)

  1. Sannier A, "Pathological prognostic factors in locally advanced rectal carcinoma after neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy: analysis of 113 cases", Histopathology, 65, pp.623~630 (2014)
  2. Quah HM, "Pathologic stage is most prognostic of disease-free survival in locally advanced rectal cancer patients after preoperative chemoradiation", Cancer, 113, pp.57~64 (2008)
  3. Rödel C, "Prognostic significance of tumor regression after preoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer", J Clin Oncol, 23, pp.8688~8696 (2005)
  4. Medich D, "Preoperative chemoradiotherapy and radical surgery for locally advanced distal rectal adenocarcinoma: pathologic findings and clinical implications", Dis Colon Rectum, 44, pp.1123~1128 (2001)
  5. Guillem JG, "Long-term oncologic outcome following preoperative combined modality therapy and total mesorectal excision of locally advanced rectal cancer", Ann Surg, 241, pp.829~836 (2005)
  6. Duldulao MP, "Distribution of residual cancer cells in the bowel wall after neoadjuvant chemoradiation in patients with rectal cancer", Dis Colon Rectum, 56, pp.142~149 (2013)
  7. Das P, "Clinical and pathologic predictors of locoregional recurrence, distant metastasis, and overall survival in patients treated with chemoradiation and mesorectal excision for rectal cancer", Am J Clin Oncol, 29, pp.219~224 (2006)
  8. Bernstein TE, "Circumferential resection margin as a prognostic factor in rectal cancer", Br J Surg, 96, pp.1348~1357 (2009)
  9. Rullier A, "Impact of tumor response on survival after radiochemotherapy in locally advanced rectal carcinoma", Am J Surg Pathol, 34, pp.562~568 (2010)
  10. Gosens MJ, "Circumferential margin involvement is the crucial prognostic factor after multimodality treatment in patients with locally advanced rectal carcinoma", Clin Cancer Res, 13, pp.6617~6623 (2007)
  11. Gosens MJ, "Improvement of staging by combining tumor and treatment parameters: the value for prognostication in rectal cancer", Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 5, pp.997~1003 (2007)
  12. Huebner M, "Partial pathologic response and nodal status as most significant prognostic factors for advanced rectal cancer treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy", World J Surg, 36, pp.675~683 (2012)
  13. Lee JH, "The influence of the treatment response on the impact of resection margin status after preoperative chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer", BMC Cancer, 13, pp.576~ (2013)
  14. Beddy D, "A simplified tumor regression grade correlates with survival in locally advanced rectal carcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy", Ann Surg Oncol, 15, pp.3471~3477 (2008)
  15. Edge SB, "The American Joint Committee on Cancer: the 7th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual and the future of TNM", Ann Surg Oncol, 17, pp.1471~1474 (2010)
  16. Kim HJ, "Clinical significance of thrombocytosis before preoperative chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer: predicting pathologic tumor response and oncologic outcome", Ann Surg Oncol, 22, pp.513~519 (2015)
  17. Park JS, "Laparoscopic versus open intersphincteric resection and coloanal anastomosis for low rectal cancer: intermediate-term oncologic outcomes", Ann Surg, 254, pp.941~946 (2011)
  18. Park JS, "A circumferential resection margin of 1 mm is a negative prognostic factor in rectal cancer patients with and without neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy", Dis Colon Rectum, 57, pp.933~940 (2014)
  19. Hwang MR, "Prognostic impact of circumferential resection margin in rectal cancer treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy", Ann Surg Oncol, 21, pp.1345~1351 (2014)
  20. Kwon MJ, "Frequency of KRAS, BRAF, and PIK3CA mutations in advanced colorectal cancers: Comparison of peptide nucleic acid-mediated PCR clamping and direct sequencing in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue", Pathol Res Pract, 207, pp.762~768 (2011)
  21. Nagtegaal ID, "What is the role for the circumferential margin in the modern treatment of rectal cancer?", J Clin Oncol, 26, pp.303~312 (2008)
  22. Quirke P, "Local recurrence of rectal adenocarcinoma due to inadequate surgical resection. Histopathological study of lateral tumour spread and surgical excision", Lancet, 2, pp.996~999 (1986)
  23. Birbeck KF, "Rates of circumferential resection margin involvement vary between surgeons and predict outcomes in rectal cancer surgery", Ann Surg, 235, pp.449~457 (2002)
  24. Wibe A, "Prognostic significance of the circumferential resection margin following total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer", Br J Surg, 89, pp.327~334 (2002)
  25. Baik SH, "Prognostic significance of circumferential resection margin following total mesorectal excision and adjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with rectal cancer", Ann Surg Oncol, 14, pp.462~469 (2007)
  26. de Haas-Kock DF, "Prognostic significance of radial margins of clearance in rectal cancer", Br J Surg, 83, pp.781~785 (1996)
  27. Bouzourene H, "Predictive factors in locally advanced rectal cancer treated with preoperative hyperfractionated and accelerated radiotherapy", Hum Pathol, 34, pp.541~548 (2003)
  28. Luna-Pérez P, "Prognostic significance of circumferential margin involvement in rectal adenocarcinoma treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy and low anterior resection", J Surg Oncol, 90, pp.20~25 (2005)
  29. Rullier A, "Predictive factors of positive circumferential resection margin after radiochemotherapy for rectal cancer: the French randomised trial ACCORD12", 0405 PRODIGE 2, 2013, pp.49, 82~89

관련 논문AI추천

Circumferential Resection Margin Involvement in Stage III Rectal Cancer Patients Treated with Curative Resection Followed by Chemoradiotherapy: A Surrogate Marker for Local Recurrence?허혁, 강정현, 김남규, 김현기, 민병소, 백승혁, 손승국, 이강영연세대학교의과대학 · Yonsei Medical Journal2013 · 제54권 제1호Redefining the Positive Circumferential Resection Margin by Incorporating Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy Treatment Response in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Multicenter Validation Study강성범, 김대용, 김민주, 김선영, 김성환, 김재성, 김태유, 김태현, 박성찬, 박희철, 백지연, 오재환, 이종훈, 이주호, 장희진, 정승용, 지의규, 최두호대한암학회 · Cancer Research and Treatment2018 · 제50권 제2호Evaluation of treatment response and tissue necrosis as prognostic indicators following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer patients김성환, 심병용, 이강문, Ho Jung An, Hyeon-Min Cho, Hyung Jin Kim, Ji Han Jung, Jonghoon Lee대한내과학회 · The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine2016 · 제31권 제1호What Is the Ideal Tumor Regression Grading System in Rectal Cancer Patients after Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy?김대용, 김선영, 김수희, 남병호, 박성찬, 박지원, 백지연, 오재환, 유아미, 장희진대한암학회 · Cancer Research and Treatment2016 · 제48권 제3호New Perspectives on Predictive Biomarkers of Tumor Response and Their Clinical Application in Preoperative Chemoradiation Therapy for Rectal Cancer허혁, 김남규연세대학교의과대학 · Yonsei Medical Journal2015 · 제56권 제6호Are We Predicting Disease Progress of the Rectal Cancer Patients without Surgery after Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy?김희철, 박윤아, 오보영, 윤성현, 이우용, 전호경, 조용범, 허정욱대한암학회 · Cancer Research and Treatment2018 · 제50권 제3호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (14건)