Preoperative Evaluation of Lower Rectal Cancer by Pelvic MR with and without Gel Filling
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose : To assess the usefulness of rectal filling using ultrasonographic gel in patients with lower rectal cancer. Materials and Methods: Twenty five patients with lower rectal cancer were enrolled. High resolution pelvic MR was performedtwice before and after gel filling. Independently and retrospectively, two radiologists reviewed each set of MRimages using five-grade scales for sphincter involvement, CRM (circumferential resection margin) involvement and depictionof the tumor. Same two radiologists retrospectively performed consensus review of each set of MR images for tumordistance from the anal verge and T&N staging. Results: Tumor depiction scores from MR with gel filling were significantly higher than those of MR without distention(p<0.001). Compared to MR without distension, MR with gel filling had no significant differences in prediction of CRM orsphincter involvement (p>0.05). Distance from the anal verge was significantly different between MR with gel filling andrigid endoscopy (6.8 1.6 cm vs. 5.8 1.6 cm, p=0.001). There were no significant differences between pathologicalstaging and MR staging with or without gel filling. Conclusion: MR with gel filling improved tumor depiction. And also MR with gel filling revealed same ability for the predictionsof CRM or sphincter invasion in patients with lower rectal cancer, comparing with MR without gel filling.
Abstract
Purpose : To assess the usefulness of rectal filling using ultrasonographic gel in patients with lower rectal cancer. Materials and Methods: Twenty five patients with lower rectal cancer were enrolled. High resolution pelvic MR was performedtwice before and after gel filling. Independently and retrospectively, two radiologists reviewed each set of MRimages using five-grade scales for sphincter involvement, CRM (circumferential resection margin) involvement and depictionof the tumor. Same two radiologists retrospectively performed consensus review of each set of MR images for tumordistance from the anal verge and T&N staging. Results: Tumor depiction scores from MR with gel filling were significantly higher than those of MR without distention(p<0.001). Compared to MR without distension, MR with gel filling had no significant differences in prediction of CRM orsphincter involvement (p>0.05). Distance from the anal verge was significantly different between MR with gel filling andrigid endoscopy (6.8 1.6 cm vs. 5.8 1.6 cm, p=0.001). There were no significant differences between pathologicalstaging and MR staging with or without gel filling. Conclusion: MR with gel filling improved tumor depiction. And also MR with gel filling revealed same ability for the predictionsof CRM or sphincter invasion in patients with lower rectal cancer, comparing with MR without gel filling.
참고문헌 (27)
- Leo E, "Sphincter-saving surgery for low rectal cancer. The experience of the National Cancer Institute, Milano", Surg Oncol, pp.103~109 (2004)
- Holzer B, "Magnetic resonance imaging predicts sphincter invasion of low rectal cancer and influences selection of operation", Surgery, 133, pp.656~661
- Iafrate F, "Preoperative staging of rectal cancer with MR imaging: correlation with surgical and histopathologic findings", Radiographics, 26, pp.701~714 (2006)
- Goh JS, "Methylcellulose as a rectal contrast agent for MR imaging of rectal carcinoma", AJR Am J Roentgenol, 178, pp.1145~1146 (2002)
- Kim MJ, "Preoperative MRI of rectal cancer with and without rectal water filling: an intraindividual comparison", AJR Am J Roentgenol, 182, pp.1469~1476 (2004)
- Wallengren NO, "Rectal carcinoma: double-contrast MR imaging for preoperative staging", Radiology, 215, pp.108~114 (2000)
- Panaccione JL, "Rectal barium in pelvic MR imaging: initial results", J Magn Reson Imaging, 1, pp.605~607 (1991)
- Urban M, "MR imaging for the preoperative planning of sphincter-saving surgery for tumors of the lower third of the rectum: use of intravenous and endorectal contrast materials", Radiology, 214, pp.503~508 (2000)
- Chassang M, "Utility of vaginal and rectal contrast medium in MRI for the detection of deep pelvic endometriosis", Eur Radiol, 20, pp.1003~1010 (2010)
- Kikuchi I, "Diagnosis of complete cul-de-sac obliteration (CCDSO) by the MRI jelly method", J Magn Reson Imaging, 29, pp.365~370 (2009)
- Kim SH, "Sonography transmission gel as endorectal contrast agent for tumor visualization in rectal cancer", AJR Am J Roentgenol, 191, pp.186~189 (2008)
- Arnoletti JP, "Neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy for rectal cancer", Surg Oncol Clin N Am, 15, pp.147~157 (2006)
- Peschaud F, "Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in rectal cancer depends on location of the tumor", Dis Colon Rectum, 48, pp.1603~1609 (2005)
- Slater A, "Distance between the rectal wall and mesorectal fascia measured by MRI: Effect of rectal distension and implications for preoperative prediction of a tumour-free circumferential resection margin", Clin Radiol, 61, pp.65~70 (2006)
- Kuo LJ, "Interpretation of magnetic resonance imaging for locally advanced rectal carcinoma after preoperative chemoradiation therapy", Dis Colon Rectum, 48, pp.23~28 (2005)
- Chen CC, "How accurate is magnetic resonance imaging in restaging rectal cancer in patients receiving preoperative combined chemoradiotherapy?", Dis Colon Rectum, 48, pp.722~728 (2005)
- Reerink O, "A favourable pathological stage after neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy in patients with initially irresectable rectal cancer correlates with a favourable prognosis", Eur J Cancer, 39, pp.192~195 (2003)
- Vliegen RF, "Mesorectal fascia invasion after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: accuracy of MR imaging for prediction", Radiology, 246, pp.454~462 (2008)
- Beets-Tan RG, "Rectal cancer: review with emphasis on MR imaging", Radiology, 232, pp.335~346 (2004)
- Brown G, "Rectal carcinoma:thin-section MR imaging for staging in 28 patients", Radiology, 211, pp.215~222 (1999)
- Gagliardi G, "Preoperative staging of rectal cancer using magnetic resonance imaging with external phase-arrayed coils", Arch Surg, 137, pp.447~451 (2002)
- Blomqvist L, "Rectal tumor staging:MR imaging using pelvic phasedarray and endorectal coils vs endoscopic ultrasonography", Eur Radiol, 10, pp.653~660 (2000)
- Kim JH, "High resolution MR imaging for nodal staging in rectal cancer: are there any criteria in addition to the size?", Eur J Radiol, 52, pp.78~83 (2004)
- Brown G, "Morphologic predictors of lymph node status in rectal cancer with use of highspatial-resolution MR imaging with histopathologic comparison", Radiology, 227, pp.371~377 (2003)
- Piscatelli N, "Localizing colorectal cancer by colonoscopy", Arch Surg, 140, pp.932~935 (2005)
- Baatrup G, "Rigid sigmoidoscopy and MRI are not interchangeable in determining the position of rectal cancers", Eur J Surg Oncol, 35, pp.1169~1173 (2009)
- Choi JY, "Abdominal applications of 3.0-T MR imaging: comparative review versus a 1.5-T system", Radiographics, 28, pp.e30~ (2008)