본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

The Difference in Pupil Size Responding to Cognitive Load and Emotional Arousal Questions between Guilty and Innocent Groups

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

The purpose of this study is to examine the effects of emotional arousal and cognitive load on pupil diameter during a lie detection interview. The guilty group (n = 30) committed a mock crime (i.e., stealing cash) and the innocent group (n = 30) performed a mission (i.e., sending a message) in the research assistant’s office. After that, their pupil size was measured using a wearable eye-tracker during the interview. The interview questions were classified with the three cognitive load, three emotional arousal, and three neutral questions. The results indicate that the main effects of group and time were not significant, but the interaction between group and time was significant. It means that when answering cognitive load questions, the guilty group showed larger increase in pupil diameter than the innocent group. The present study suggests that inducing cognitive load is more effective than inducing emotional arousal during an interview when using pupil diameter as an index of deception, and it is expected to improve the accuracy of lie detection.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the effects of emotional arousal and cognitive load on pupil diameter during a lie detection interview. The guilty group (n = 30) committed a mock crime (i.e., stealing cash) and the innocent group (n = 30) performed a mission (i.e., sending a message) in the research assistant’s office. After that, their pupil size was measured using a wearable eye-tracker during the interview. The interview questions were classified with the three cognitive load, three emotional arousal, and three neutral questions. The results indicate that the main effects of group and time were not significant, but the interaction between group and time was significant. It means that when answering cognitive load questions, the guilty group showed larger increase in pupil diameter than the innocent group. The present study suggests that inducing cognitive load is more effective than inducing emotional arousal during an interview when using pupil diameter as an index of deception, and it is expected to improve the accuracy of lie detection.

참고문헌 (41)

  1. Beatty, J., "Task-Evoked Pupillary Responses, Processing Load, and the Structure of Processing Resources", Psychological Bulletin, 91(2), pp.276~292 (1982)
  2. Bovard, P. P., "Effects of Direct and Indirect Questions On The Ocular-Motor Deception Test", Polygraph, 48(1), pp.40~59 (2019)
  3. Bradley, M. M., "The pupil as a measure of emotional arousal and autonomic activation", Psychophysiology, 45(4), pp.602~607 (2008)
  4. Cook, A. E., "Lyin’ eyes: Ocular-motor measures of reading reveal deception", Journal of Experimental Psychology. Applied, 18(3), pp.301~313 (2012)
  5. DePaulo, B. M., "Cues to deception", Psychological Bulletin, 129(1), pp.74~112 (2003)
  6. Dionisio, D. P., "Differentiation of deception using pupillary responses as an index of cognitive processing", Psychophysiology, 38(2), pp.205~211 (2001)
  7. Duncan, S., "Affect is a form of cognition : A neurobiological analysis", Cognition and Emotion, 21(6), pp.1184~1211 (2007)
  8. Ekman, P., "An argument for basic emotions", Cognition & Emotion, 6(3-4), pp.169~200 (1992)
  9. Gawrylowicz, J., "Does practice make the perfect liar? The effect of rehearsal and increased cognitive load on cues to deception", Applied Cognitive Psychology, 30(2), pp.250~259 (2016)
  10. Gombos, V. A., "The cognition of deception : The role of executive processes in producing lies", Genetic Social and General Psychology Monography, 132, pp.197~214 (2006)
  11. Horowitz, S. W., "The role of comparison questions in physiological detection of deception", Psychophysiology, 34(1), pp.108~115 (1997)
  12. In-Albon, T., "Vigilance and avoidance of threat in the eye movements of children with separation anxiety disorder", Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 38(2), pp.225~235 (2010)
  13. Kim, J. T., "A study of based on the standardization of the STAI forKorea", The New Medical Journal, 21(1), pp.69~75 (1978)
  14. 이혜수, "거짓진술행동에서 나타나는 정서적 각성 및 인지적 부하", 한국심리학회지: 사회및성격, 29(4), pp.85~101 (2015), 한국사회및성격심리학회[DOI]
  15. 이연실, "안구운동 추적장비를 통한 거짓말자의 동공크기 및 안구운동 연구", 한국심리학회지: 사회및성격, 30(2), pp.63~76 (2016), 한국사회및성격심리학회[DOI]
  16. Lim, E. J., "Trend in the affective states and behaviors of shame and guilt according to attribution styles among children", pp.2010
  17. Lykken, D. T., "A tremor in the blood: Uses and abuses of the lie detector" (1981), McGraw-Hill
  18. Marschall, D., "state shame and guilt scale" (1994), George Mason University
  19. McCornack, S. A., "Information manipulation theory", Communication Monographs, 29, pp.1~16 (1992)
  20. Meijer, E. H., "Deception detection with behavioral, autonomic, and neural measures: Conceptual and methodological considerations that warrant modesty", Psychophysiology, 53(5), pp.593~604 (2016)
  21. National Research Council, "The polygraph and lie detection" (2003), The National Academies Press
  22. Partala, T., "Pupil size variation as an indication of affective processing", International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 59(1), pp.185~198 (2003)
  23. Rajan, P. B., "Polygraph Tests-Benefits and Challenges", Academicus International Scientific Journal, 10(19), pp.146~155 (2019)
  24. Raskin, D. C., "Handbook of Polygraph Testing" (2002), Academic Press
  25. Spielberger, C. D., "Manual for the state-trait anxiety inventory" (1970), ConsultingPsychologists Press
  26. Sporer, S. L., "ParaverbalIndicators of deception: A meta-analyticsynthesis", Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, pp.421~426 (2006)
  27. Steinhauer, S. R., "Sympathetic and parasympathetic innervation of pupillary dilation during sustained processing", International Journal of Psychophysiology, 52(1), pp.77~86 (2004)
  28. Stern, R. M., "Psychophysiological recording" (2001), Oxford University Press
  29. Verschuere, B., "Taxing the brain to uncover lying? Meta-analyzing the effect of imposing cognitive load on the reaction-time costs of lying", Journal of applied research in memory and cognition, 7(3), pp.462~469 (2018)
  30. Vrij A., "Detecting lies and deceit: Pitfalls and opportunities" (2008), Wiley
  31. Vrij, A., "Detecting deception by manipulating cognitive load", Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, pp.141~142 (2006)
  32. Vrij, A., "Outsmarting the liars: Toward a cognitive lie detection approach", Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(1), pp.28~32 (2011)
  33. Vrij, A., "Pitfalls and opportunities in nonverbal and verbal lie detection", Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 11(3), pp.89~121 (2010)
  34. Vrij, A., "Outsmarting the liars: The benefit of asking unanticipated questions", Law and Human Behavior, 33(2), pp.159~166 (2009)
  35. Vrij, A., "Information-gathering vs accusatory interview style: Individual differences in respondents’ experiences", Personality and Individual Differences, 41(4), pp.589~599 (2006)
  36. Vrij, A., "Increasing cognitive load to facilitate lie detection : The benefit of recalling an event in reverse order", Law and Human Behavior, 32(3), pp.253~265 (2008)
  37. Walczyk, J. J., "Advancing lie detection by inducing cognitive load on liars : A review of relevant theories and techniques guided by lessons from polygraph-based approaches", Frontiers in Psychology, 4, pp.14~ (2013)
  38. Walczyk, J. J., "Lying person-to-person about life events : A cognitive framework for lie detection", Personnel Psychology, 58(1), pp.141~170 (2005)
  39. Wang, J. T., "A handbook of process tracing methods for decision research: A critical review and user’s guide" (2011), Psychology Press
  40. Webb, A. K., "Effectiveness of pupil diameter in a probable lie comparison question test for deception", Legal and Criminological Psychology, 14(2), pp.279~292 (2009)
  41. Zuckerman, M., "Verbal and nonverbal communication of deception", Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 14, pp.1~59 (1981)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)