임플란트 식립 초기 의원성 동요가 최종 골결합에 미치는 영향
The influence of iatrogenic mobilization in the initial stage of implant installation on final osteointegration
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
이 연구의 목적은 임플란트 식립 초기 수회의 의원성 동요가 최종 골결합에 미치는 영향을 확인하는 것이다. 연구 재료 및 방법: 순수한 티타늄(Grade IV) 으로 직경 3.75 mm, 길이 8 mm의 실험용 임플란트를 제작한 후, 하방 4 mm에 RBM 표면처리(MegaGen: Ca-P)를 하였다. 임플란트의 하부만 골에 식립되었으며 비침하시켰다. 수술은 3.5 kg이상의 토끼의 좌우 경골의 단층 치밀골에 각각 2개씩 130개를 통상적인 방법으로 식립하였다(Female, New Zealand White). 비틀림 제거 간격에 따라, 다음과 같은 13개의 군으로 나누었다; Group I (1일), Group II (1일 + 2일), Group III (1일 + 2일 + 3일), Group IV (1일 + 2일 + 3일 + 4일), Group V (2일), Group VI (2일 + 4일), Group VII (2일 + 4일 + 6일), Group VIII (2일 + 4일 + 6일 + 8일), Group IX (4일), Group X (4일 + 7일), Group XI (4일 + 7일 + 10일), Group XII (4일 + 7일 + 10일 + 14일), 그리고 대조군. 대조군은 식립 후 8주의 치유기간을 준 후 최종 비틀림 제거력을 측정하였다(Mark-10, USA). 실험군은 각각의 조건에 맞추어 1회에서 4회에 걸쳐 비틀림 제거력을 측정하였다. 비틀림 제거력을 측정한 이후에 대체적으로 임플란트를 측정 전의 위치로 재위치시켰다. 모든 실험군에서 임플란트 식립 후 8주간의 치유기간을 준 다음 최종 비틀림 제거력을 측정하여 대조군, 각 실험군의 1, 2, 3, 4번째 비틀림 제거력과 비교하였다. 결과: 실험군 간에 최종 비틀림 제거력을 비교한 결과에서, XII군을 제외한 실험군의 비틀림 제거력은 대조군과 유의할만한 차이를 보이지는 않았다. 그리고 실험 I군과 II군의 값은 VI, VIII, X, XI, XII군의 값보다 유의하게 높게 나타났다. 그리고 III, IV, V군은 XI, XII군의 값보다 유의하게 높게 나타났다. 각 실험군간 비틀림 제거력 비교에서, 최종 비틀림 제거력은 VIII, X, XI, XII군을 제외한 모든 군에서 높게 나타났다. 결론: 충분한 치유기간이 주어진다면, 토끼에게 임플란트 식립 후 매우 이른 초기에 지대주에 가해지는 약간의 동요는 임플란트 골결합에 영향을 미치지 않았다.
Abstract
The aim of present investigation was to find out the influence of several times iatrogenic mobilization in the initial stage of implant installation on bone-implant osteointegration. Materials and methods: The experimental implants (3.75 mm in diameter, 8.0 mm in length) were made of commercially pure (Grade IV) titanium, and were treated with RBM (MegaGen: Ca-P) on lower 4.0 mm part. Only lower part of implant was inserted to bone and the implants were nonsubmerged. The 130 implants (two in each tibia) were inserted into the monocortical tibias of 33 rabbits which each weighed more than 3.5 kg (Female, New Zealand White). According to the removal torqueinterval, the groups were divided into 13 groups, group I (1 day), group II (1 day + 2 days), group III (1 day + 2 days + 3 days), group IV (1 day + 2 days + 3 days + 4 days), group V (2 days), group VI (2 days + 4 days), group VII (2 days + 4 days + 6 days), group VIII (2 days + 4 days + 6 days + 8 days), group IX (4 days), group X (4 days + 7 days), group XI (4 days + 7 days + 10 days), group XII (4 days + 7 days + 10 days + 14 days) and control group. In the control group, the removal torque was measured at 8 weeks with a digital torque gauge (Mark-10, USA). In the experimental groups, the removal torque was given once, twice, three times or four times by experiment design before the final removal torque and the value was measured each time. The implants were then screwed back to their original positions. All the experimental groups were given a final healing time of 8 weeks after placement, in which values were compared with the control groups and the 1st, 2nd, 3rd or 4th removal torque values in each experimental group. Results: In comparison of the final removal torque tests among experimental groups, the removal torque value of experimental groups except group XII were not statistically different that of control group. And the values of group I and II were significantly higher than the values of group VI, VIII, X, XI, and XII. In addition, the values of group III, IV, and V were significantly higher than group XI and XII. In comparison of the removal torque in the each experimental group, the final removal torque were significantly higher in all groups except group VIII, X, XI, and XII. Conclusion: If sufficient healing time was allowed, a few mobilization of fixture at the very early stage after the implant placement in the rabbits didn't interrupt the final bone to implant osseointegration.
참고문헌 (25)
- Branemark PI, "Intra-osseous anchorage of dental prostheses. I. Experimental studies", Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg, 3, pp.81~100 (1969)
- Branemark PI, "Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10-year period", Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Suppl, 16, pp.1~132 (1977)
- Szmukler-Moncler S, "Timing of loading and effect of micromotion on bone-dental implant interface: review of experimental literature", J Biomed Mater Res, 43, pp.192~203 (1998)
- Akagawa Y, "Initial bone-implant interfaces of submergible and supramergible endosseous single-crystal sapphire implants", J Prosthet Dent, 55, pp.96~100 (1986)
- Ivanoff CJ, "Reintegration of mobilized titanium implants. An experimental study in rabbit tibia", Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 26, pp.310~315 (1997)
- Ye SH, "An investigation of reosseointegration according to time course after intentional mobilization of implant fixtures", 박사, pp.2009
- 장지훈, "임플란트 고정체의 의원성 동요 후 골 유착 반응에 관한 연구", 대한치과보철학회지, 48(03), pp.209~214 (2010), 대한치과보철학회
- 황윤진, "임플란트 고정체의 인위적 비틀림 후 시간 경과에 따른 골재유착 반응에 관한 연구", 대한치과보철학회지, 48(04), pp.308~314 (2010), 대한치과보철학회
- Cho JH, "The influence of intentional mobilization of implant fixtures before osseointegration", 박사, pp.2011
- Szmukler-Moncler S, "Considerations preliminary to the application of early and immediate loading protocols in dental implantology", Clin Oral Implants Res, 11, pp.12~25 (2000)
- Ganeles J, "Immediate loading of implants with fixed restorations in the completely edentulous mandible: report of 27 patients from a private practice", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 16, pp.418~426 (2001)
- Tarnow DP, "Immediate loading of threaded implants at stage 1 surgery in edentulous arches: ten consecutive case reports with 1- to 5-year data", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 12, pp.319~324 (1997)
- Piattelli A, "An histologic and histomorphometric study of bone reactions to unloaded and loaded non-submerged single implants in monkeys:a pilot study", J Oral Implantol, 19, pp.314~320 (1993)
- Schnitman PA, "Ten-year results for Branemark implants immediately loaded with fixed prostheses at implant placement", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 12, pp.495~503 (1997)
- Wismeijer D, "ITI Treatment guide", pp.3~8 (2010), Quintessence Publishing
- Gapski R, "Critical re-view of immediate implant loading", Clin Oral Implants Res, 14, pp.515~527 (2003)
- Roberts WE, "Osseous adaptation to continuous loading of rigid endosseous implants", Am J Orthod, 86, pp.95~111 (1984)
- Brunski JB, "Avoid pitfalls of overloading and micromotion of intraosseous implants", Dent Implantol Update, 4, pp.77~81 (1993)
- Albrektsson T, , J Prosthet Dent, 50, pp.101~107 (1983)
- Branemark PI, "Branemark Novum: a new treatment concept for rehabilitation of the edentulous mandible. Preliminary results from a prospective clinical followup study", Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 1, pp.2~16 (1999)
- Roberts WE, "Implants:Bone physiology and metabolism", CDA J, 15, pp.54~61 (1987)
- Sennerby L, "Early tissue response to titanium implants inserted in rabbit cortical bone", J Mater Science: Mater Med, 4, pp.240~250 (1993)
- Sennerby L, "A morphometric and biomechanic comparison of titanium implants inserted in rabbit cortical and cancellous bone", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 7, pp.62~71 (1992)
- Sennerby L, "Clinical outcomes of immediate", early loading of dental implants. A literature review of recent controlled prospective clinical studies, 2008, pp.53, S82~S88
- Misch CE, "Contemporary implant dentistry", pp.799~834 (1999), Mosby;Elsevier