‘사드 재판’을 둘러싼 패러독스 고찰

Abstract

This paper paid attention to Paradox and examined the ‘Sade Trial’ and the Sade that appeared in literary works of this period. Sade, who was summoned to court for obscenity with unclear concept, Shibusawa Tatsuhiko, who had conflicts with lawyers as he placed more importance on defeat than victory in the trial, And the phenomenon of public attention being paid to Sade, which is known only to some people, and Shibusawa Tatsuhiko, an unknown writer, established the writer’s position as an agitator of anti-power through trial, The contradiction with Shibusa Tatsuhiko, who makes political remarks but thoroughly distanced himself from politics, is all a paradox surrounding the ‘Sade Trial’. Such paradoxes and contradictions are related to the fact that the struggle with Shibusa was very ideological in nature with imagination. Imagination is a keyword that understands Sade’s ideas and literature and is deeply connected to literary works of this period. This can be said to be in the same context as Shibusawa’s move to accept imagination as the essence of the revolution and wage an ideological struggle. The creative act of prison writers who want to overcome the real society as an imaginary society is a backlash against oppression and an expression of ideas that destroy the existing order. This is consistent with the actions of Shibusawa Tatsuhiko, who accept imagination as the essence of the revolution and engage in ideological struggles.