Pragmatic Strengthening is not Strong Enough: Meanings of Sequential Closed-Class Forms
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study focuses on the semantics of word patterns and schematic constructions. Examples of constructions with purportedly rich meanings are shown to convey readings less complex than is claimed in the literature. Many previous studies stressed these constructions’ idiosyncratic properties which have been held up as arguments in favor of their special construction status— pairings of (usually unique, conventionalized) form and (usually idiosyncratic) meaning. I wish to argue that although the constructions reviewed here do have clear meanings, their form and function are not as idiosyncratic, irregular, or unpredictable as they are portrayed in the literature. Indeed, the formal and functional properties of one construction analyzed here, the Incredulity Response Construction fit well within traditional characterizations of items located on the syntactic side of the lexicon-syntax continuum. I will attempt to demonstrate that the form of the construction is an iconic representation of its reading. Additionally, I question the reading itself, arguing that the incredulity that gave rise to the construction’s very name is not its semantic contribution. Instead, I propose a more general and abstract reading of incongruousness or “cognitive dissonance”. Finally, it is argued that there are no known mechanisms that could equip constructions with overly rich semantic content. One potential candidate, pragmatic strengthening, capable of endowing constructions with meanings does not go beyond fairly sparse readings already known to occur in grammatical forms.
Abstract
This study focuses on the semantics of word patterns and schematic constructions. Examples of constructions with purportedly rich meanings are shown to convey readings less complex than is claimed in the literature. Many previous studies stressed these constructions’ idiosyncratic properties which have been held up as arguments in favor of their special construction status— pairings of (usually unique, conventionalized) form and (usually idiosyncratic) meaning. I wish to argue that although the constructions reviewed here do have clear meanings, their form and function are not as idiosyncratic, irregular, or unpredictable as they are portrayed in the literature. Indeed, the formal and functional properties of one construction analyzed here, the Incredulity Response Construction fit well within traditional characterizations of items located on the syntactic side of the lexicon-syntax continuum. I will attempt to demonstrate that the form of the construction is an iconic representation of its reading. Additionally, I question the reading itself, arguing that the incredulity that gave rise to the construction’s very name is not its semantic contribution. Instead, I propose a more general and abstract reading of incongruousness or “cognitive dissonance”. Finally, it is argued that there are no known mechanisms that could equip constructions with overly rich semantic content. One potential candidate, pragmatic strengthening, capable of endowing constructions with meanings does not go beyond fairly sparse readings already known to occur in grammatical forms.
참고문헌 (56)
- Akmajian, A., "Sentence Types and the Form–Function Fit", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 2, pp.1~23 (1984)
- Bally, C., "Précis de Stylistique" (1905), A.Eggimann et Cie
- Barðdal, J., "Sign-based construction grammar", pp.257~308 (2012), CSLI Publications
- Brinton, L. J., "Lexicalization and Language Change" (2005), Cambridge University Press
- Bybee, J., "Language, Usage and Cognition" (2010), Cambridge University Press
- Bybee, J., "The Evolution of Grammar. Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World" (1994), University of Chicago Press
- Chafe, W., "Discourse, Consciousness, and Time: The flow and displacement of conscious experience in speaking and writing" (1994), University of Chicago Press
- Chomsky, N., "On Language" (1998), The New Press
- Corbett, G., "The World’s Major Languages", pp.330~346 (2009), Routledge
- Croft, W., "Cognitive Linguistics" (2004), Cambridge University Press
- Cruse, D. A., "Lexical Semantics" (1986), Cambridge University Press
- Culicover, P., "Simpler Syntax" (2005), Oxford University Press
- Di Sciullo, A.-M., "On the Definition of Word" (1987), MIT Press
- Dowty, D., "Thematic proto-roles and argument selection", Language, 67, pp.547~619 (1991)
- Etxepare, R., "Towards a Syntax of Adult Root Infinitives", Current Issues in Romance Languages: Selected Papers from the 29th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages, pp.65~80 (2002), John Benjamins
- Evans, V., "Time to Speak: Cognitive and Neural Prerequisites for Time in Language", pp.27~33 (2009), John Wiley
- Foolen, A. P., "Moving Ourselves, Moving Others: Motion and emotion in intersubjectivity, consciousness and language", pp.349~368 (2012), John Benjamins
- Fries, C. C., "American English Grammar" (1940), Appeton-Century-Crofts
- Goldberg, A. E., "Constructions: a new theoretical approach to language", Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(5), pp.219~224 (2003)
- Goldberg, A. E., "Constructions At Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language" (2006), Oxford University Press
- Goldberg, A. E., "Verbs, Constructions, and Semantic Frames. In:Lexical Semantics, Syntax, and Event Structure", pp.39~58 (2010), Oxford University Press
- Goldberg, A. E., "The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar", pp.15~31 (2013), Oxford University Press
- Goldberg, A. E., "This is to Count as a Construction", Folia Linguistica, 46(1), pp.109~132 (2012)
- Horn, L. R., "Meaning, Form, and Use in Context: Linguistic Applications", pp.11~42 (1984), Georgetown University Press
- Hudson, R., "Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition", pp.89~113 (2008), Routledge
- Jackendoff, R., "Verb-Particle Explorations", pp.67~94 (2002), Mouton de Gruyter
- Janda, L., "A Geography of Case Semantics: The Czech Dative and the Russian Instrumental" (1993), Mouton
- Jarad, N. I., "The Evolution of the b-Future Marker in Syrian Arabic", Lingua Posnaniensis, 55(1), pp.69~85 (2013)
- Kay, P., "Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning: Volume 3", pp.2271~2296 (2012), Mouton de Gruyter
- Kearns, K., "Light verbs in English", 석사, pp.2002
- Lambrecht, K., "What, Me Worry? -- Mad Magazine Sentences Revisited", Proceedings of the Sixteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, pp.215~228 (1990)
- Langacker, R. W., "Foundations of Cognitive Grammar: Theoretical Prerequisites, Volume 1" (1987), Stanford University Press
- Levin, B., "Unaccusativity At the Syntax-Lexical Semantics Interface" (1993), MIT Press
- Levinson, S. C., "Presumptive Meanings" (2000), MIT Press
- Matsumoto, K., "Intonation Units in Japanese Conversation:Syntactic, Informational and Functional Structures" (2003), John Benjamins
- Michaelis, L. A., "The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis", pp.155~176 (2010), Oxford University Press
- Molencki, R., "Connectives in the History of English", pp.97~114 (2007), John Benjamins
- Murphy, L. M., "Lexical Meaning" (2010), University Press
- Pinker, S., "Learnability and Cognition: The Acquisition of Argument Structure" (1989), MIT Press
- Pinker, S., "The Past-Tense Debate. The past and future of the past tense", TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences, 6(11), pp.456~463 (2002)
- Quirk, R., "A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language" (1985), Longman
- Radford, A., "Analysing English Sentences: A Minimalist Approach" (2009), Cambridge University Press
- Sorva, E., "Connectives in the History of English", pp.115~144 (2007), John Benjamins
- Szcześniak, K., "You can't cry your way to candy: Motion events and paths in the x's way construction", Cognitive Linguistics, 24(1), pp.159~194 (2013)
- Tallerman, M., "Biological Foundations and Origin of Syntax", pp.135~160 (2009), MIT Press
- Talmy, L., "Toward A Cognitive Semantics. Volume I: Concept Structuring Systems" (2000), MIT Press
- Talmy, L., "Attention Phenomena. In: The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics", pp.264~293 (2007), Oxford University Press
- Taylor, J. R., "Cognitive Grammar" (2002), Oxford University Press
- Taylor, J. R., "The Mental Corpus. How Language is Represented in the Mind" (2012), Oxford University Press
- Tomasello, M., "Do young children have adult syntactic competence?", Cognition, 74, pp.209~253 (2000)
- Tomasello, M., "The New Psychology of Language: Cognitive and Functional Approaches to Language Structure, Volume 1" (2014), Psychology Press
- Traugott, E. C., "Pragmatic Strengthening and Grammaticalization", Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, pp.406~416 (1988)
- Traugott, E. C., "Constructionalization and Constructional Changes" (2013), Oxford University Press
- Trousdale, G., "Constructional Approaches to English Grammar", pp.33~70 (2008), Mouton de Gruyter
- Wierzbicka, A., "The Semantics of Grammar" (1988), John Benjamins
- Wierzbicka, A., "English: Meaning and Culture" (2006), Oxford University Press