본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Would Lawrence Agree with Deleuze’s View of American Literature?: A Comparative Study of Their Critical Essays on Melville

1

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

Gilles Deleuze often mentions D. H. Lawrence as his great precursor, especially when discussing American literature. In such essays as “On the Superiority of Anglo-American Literature” and “Bartleby; or, The Formula” he makes it apparent that Lawrence’s Studies in Classic American Literature has been his main source of inspiration in rethinking American literature. It remains, however, an important critical task to scrutinize how much common ground Lawrence and Deleuze have, or, in reverse, how serious their differences are when they talk about American literature, particularly Herman Melville’s works. This paper argues that these differences are significant, and reverberate throughout the whole itinerary of their “thought adventure.” It involves a comparative study of their essays on Melville and their basic concepts on American history and literature: Lawrence’s “escaped slaves” and “spirit of place” and Deleuze’s “line of flight” and “becoming.” The paper presents first, Deleuze’s view on Typee, though largely relying on Lawrence’s, diverge from the latter in deleting the part of the narrator Tommo’s getting away from the savages. Second, Lawrence views the “escaped slaves” as an indispensable concept in understanding American history, whereas there is nothing comparable in Deleuze. Third, their differences will be further revealed when imagining what Lawrence would say about Deleuze’s essay on “Bartleby, the Scrivener” and comparing their interpretations of Moby-Dick, focusing on the character of Ahab.

Abstract

Gilles Deleuze often mentions D. H. Lawrence as his great precursor, especially when discussing American literature. In such essays as “On the Superiority of Anglo-American Literature” and “Bartleby; or, The Formula” he makes it apparent that Lawrence’s Studies in Classic American Literature has been his main source of inspiration in rethinking American literature. It remains, however, an important critical task to scrutinize how much common ground Lawrence and Deleuze have, or, in reverse, how serious their differences are when they talk about American literature, particularly Herman Melville’s works. This paper argues that these differences are significant, and reverberate throughout the whole itinerary of their “thought adventure.” It involves a comparative study of their essays on Melville and their basic concepts on American history and literature: Lawrence’s “escaped slaves” and “spirit of place” and Deleuze’s “line of flight” and “becoming.” The paper presents first, Deleuze’s view on Typee, though largely relying on Lawrence’s, diverge from the latter in deleting the part of the narrator Tommo’s getting away from the savages. Second, Lawrence views the “escaped slaves” as an indispensable concept in understanding American history, whereas there is nothing comparable in Deleuze. Third, their differences will be further revealed when imagining what Lawrence would say about Deleuze’s essay on “Bartleby, the Scrivener” and comparing their interpretations of Moby-Dick, focusing on the character of Ahab.

참고문헌 (24)

  1. Agamben, Giorgio, "Potentialities: Collected Essays in Philosophy" (1999), Stanford University Press
  2. Bloom, Harold, "Reflections in the Evening Land", The Guardian, 17, pp.4~5 (2005)
  3. Bruns, Gerald L, "Becoming-Animal(Some Simple Ways)", New Literary History, 38, pp.703~720 (2007)
  4. Colacurcio, Michael J., "The Symbolic and the Symptomatic: D. H. Lawrence in Recent American Criticism", American Quarterly, 27, pp.486~501 (1975)
  5. Crawford, T. Hugh, "Captain Deleuze and the White Whale: Melville, Moby-Dick, and Cartographic Inclination", Social Semiotics, 7, pp.219~232 (1997)
  6. Deleuze, Gilles, "Essays Critical and Clinical", pp.68~90 (1998), Verso
  7. Deleuze, Gilles, "Dialogues" (1987), Columbia University Press
  8. Deleuze, Gilles, "A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia" (1987), University of Minnesota Press
  9. Deleuze, Gilles, "Kafka: Toward a Minor Literature" (1986), University of Minnesota Press
  10. Deleuze, Gilles, "What Is Philosophy?" (1994), Columbia University Press
  11. Findlay, Isobel M., "Approaches to Teaching the Works of D. H. Lawrence", pp.137~145 (2001), Modern Language Association of America
  12. 한기욱, "로런스 멜빌론의 현재성:포스트모던 논의들과의 비교 연구", D.H. 로렌스 연구, 23(1), pp.85~103 (2015), 한국로렌스학회
  13. 한기욱, "멜빌의 남태평양 소설들과 근대성 문제: 로렌스의 멜빌론 고찰", D.H. 로렌스 연구, 22(1), pp.137~158 (2014), 한국로렌스학회
  14. Hardt, Michael, "Empire" (2000), Harvard University Press
  15. James, C. L. R., "Mariners, Renegades & Castaways: The Story of Herman Melville and the World We Live In. 1953" (2001), University Press of New England
  16. Lawrence, D. H., "Studies in Classic American Literature" (2003), Cambridge University Press
  17. Lawrence, D. H, "Psychoanalysis and the Unconscious and Fantasia of the Unconscious" (2004), Cambridge University Press
  18. Mamdani, Mahmood, "Colonialism : Then and Now", Critical Inquiry, 41, pp.596~614 (2015)
  19. Melville, Herman, "The Piazza Tales and Other Prose Pieces: 1839–1860", pp.13~45 (1987), Northwestern University Press
  20. Melville, Herman, "Moby-Dick or The Whale" (1988), Northwestern University Press
  21. Rogin, Michael Paul, "Subversive Genealogy : The Politics and Art of Herman Melville" (1983), University of California Press
  22. Pease, Donald, "Visionary Compacts : American Renaissance Writings in Cultural Context" (1987), University of Wisconsin Press
  23. Spanos, William V, "Herman Melville and the American Calling : The Fiction after Moby-Dick, 1851–1857" (2008), SUNY Press
  24. Žižek, Slavoj, "The Parallax View" (2006), MIT Press

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)