본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

주파수 필터링 함수에 따른 시간 및 주파수 영역 광음향 측정에 대한 노이즈-대비-신호 분석

Signal-to-noise ratio in time- and frequency-domain photoacoustic measurements by different frequency filtering

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류물리학

초록

구면 초점 초음파 측정기에 의해 구형의 광 흡수체로부터 측정된 시간(즉, 펄스 형태 광원) 및 주파수 영역(즉, 처프 형태 광원) 광음향 신호의 노이즈-대비-신호(signal-to-noise ratio)를 이론 및 시뮬레이션으로 분석하였다. 이전 문헌과 마찬가지로 시간 영역 광음향 측정에 의한 노이즈-대비-신호 값이 주파수 영역 광음향 측정의 경우보다 더 높았는데 이 근본적인 이유를 최대허용노광량(Maximum permissible exposure)에 따른 광원의 세기와 주파수 필터링을 통한 두 측정 모드의 광음향 스펙트럼들에 대한 분석을 통해 이해하였다. 또한, 분석의 결과로서 주파수 영역 광음향의 처프 형태 광원에 대한 정합 필터링에 더해 DC 스펙트럼 부분을 제거하니 노이즈-대비-신호가 5dB 정도 상승하는 것을 발견하였다. 특히, 주파수 필터 함수의 주파수 상한 값의 변화에 따라 노이즈-대비-신호 값이 급격하게 변동하였는데 노이즈-대비-신호가 최대가 되는 주파수 상한 값이 두 광음향 측정 모드에서 서로 다르게 나타남을 관찰하였다.

Abstract

We investigate the signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) of time-domain (i.e. pulsed illumination) and frequency-domain (i.e. chirped illumination) photoacoustic signals measured by a spherically focused ultrasound transducer for spherical absorbers. The simulation results show that the time-domain photoacoustic SNR is higher than that of frequency-domain photoacoustic signals, as reported in the previous literature. We understand the reason for this SNR gap between the two measurement modes by analyzing photoacoustic-signal spectra, considering the incident beam energy controlled by the maximum permissible exposure. As the result of this approach, we find that filtering off the DC term in the chirped signal’s spectrum improves frequency-domain photoacoustic SNRs by up to approximately 5 dB. In particular, it is observed that photoacoustic SNRs are highly sensitive to an upper-frequency value of frequency filtering functions, and the optimal upper-frequency values maximizing the SNR are different in time- and frequency-domain photoacoustic measurements.

참고문헌 (28)

  1. S. R. Arridge, "Optical tomography in medical imaging", Inverse Probl, 15, pp.R41~R93 (1999)
  2. D. Kang, "Figure of merit for task-based assessment of frequency-domain diffusive imaging", Opt. Lett, 38, pp.235~237 (2013)
  3. L. V. Wang, "Photoacoustic tomography : In vivo imaging from organelles to organs", Science, 335, pp.1458~1462 (2012)
  4. P. Beard, "Biomedical photoacoustic imaging : A review", Interface Focus, 1, pp.602~631 (2011)
  5. E. M. Strohm, "Single cell photoacoustic microscopy : A review", IEEE J. Sel. Topics Quantum Electron, 22, pp.6801215~ (2016)
  6. Y. Zhou, "Tutorial on photoacoustic tomography", J. Biomed. Opt, 21, pp.061007~ (2016)
  7. C. Li, "Photoacoustic tomography and sensing in biomedicine", Phys. Med. Biol, 54, pp.R59~R97 (2009)
  8. K. Konstantin, "Photoacoustic imaging of biological tissue with intensity-modulated continuous-wave laser", J. Biomed. Opt, 13, pp.024006~ (2008)
  9. S. Kellnberger, "In vivo frequency domain optoacoustic tomography", Opt. Lett, 37, pp.3423~3425 (2012)
  10. S. Telenkov, "Frequency-domain photothermoacoustics : Alternative imaging modality of biological tissues", J. Appl. Phys, 105, pp.102029~ (2009)
  11. S. Telenkov, "Signal-to-noise analysis of biomedical photoacoustic measurements in time and frequency domains", Rev. Sci. Instrum, 81, pp.124901~ (2010)
  12. B. Lashkari, "Comparison between pulsed laser and frequency-domain photoacoustic modalities: Signalto-noise ratio, contrast, resolution, and maximum depth detectivity", Rev. Sci. Instrum, 82, pp.094903~ (2011)
  13. L. Yang, "Photoacoustic and ultrasound imaging of cancellous bonetissue", J. Biomed. Opt, 20, pp.076016~ (2015)
  14. J. Yao, "Sensitivity of photoacoustic microscopy", Photoacoustics, 2, pp.87~101 (2014)
  15. A. Petschke, "Comparison of intensitymodulated continuous-wave lasers with a chirped modulation frequency to pulsed lasers for photoacoustic imaging applications", Biomed. Opt. Express, 1, pp.1188~1195 (2010)
  16. G. Langer, "Frequency domain photoacoustic and fluorescence microscopy", Biomed. Opt. Express, 7, pp.1~11 (2016)
  17. B. Lashkari, "Photoacoustic radar imaging signal-to-noise ratio, contrast, and resolution enhancement using nonlinear chirp modulation Bahman", Opt. Lett, 35, pp.1623~1625 (2010)
  18. B. Lashkari, "Linear frequency modulation photoacoustic radar: Optimal bandwidth and signal-to-noise ratio for frequency-domain imaging of turbid media", J. Acoust. Soc. Am, 130, pp.1313~1324 (2011)
  19. J. Goodman, "Statistical Optics" (2000), Wiley
  20. H. H. Barrett, "Foundations of Image Science" (2004), Wiley
  21. "American National Standard for the Safe Use of Lasers, ANSI Z136.1-2014, Laser Institute of America, Orlando, FL", ~ (2014)
  22. D. Leedom, "New equivalent circuits for elementary piezoelectric transducers", Electron. Lett, 6, pp.398~399 (1970)
  23. G. R. Fowles, "Introduction to Modern Optics" (1957), Holt, Rinehart and Winston
  24. J. Wang, "Saturation effect in functional photoacoustic imaging", J. Biomed. Opt, 15, pp.021317~ (2010)
  25. C. E. Cook, "Radar signals; an introduction to theory and application" (1993), Artech house, Inc
  26. B. T. Cox, "Fast calculation of pulsed photoacoustic fields in fluids using k-space methods", J. Acoust. Soc. Am, 117, pp.3616~3627 (2005)
  27. B. E. Treeby, "k-Wave: MATLAB toolbox for the simulation and reconstruction of photoacoustic wave fields", J Biomed. Opt, 15, pp.021314~ (2010)
  28. D. Kang, "Photoacoustic resonance by spatial filtering of focused ultrasound transducers", Opt. Lett, 42, pp.655~658 (2017)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (3건)