농업용수관리자동화시스템의 용수절감효과에 대한 경제적 가치 평가
Valuation of Saved Water by Automated Agricultural Water Management System: Alternative Cost Approach
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
초록
Abstract
This study analyzed and evaluated the effect of agricultural water reduction by introducing automated agricultural water management using alternative cost approach. The approach is possible to evaluate none market property as an asset. The saved agricultural water was evaluated as none market property. As the alternative goods, Seongju and Donghwa dam, typical irrigation dams in domestic, were employed. The economic benefit from water saving effect of an automated agricultural water management was calculated as depreciation expense and maintaining cost of construction agricultural dam per saved agriculture water. As a result, the saved agriculture water was 8.5 million ton per year, and the economic benefit of it was 1.3~2.1 million won.
참고문헌 (10)
- Eom, K. C., "Public Function of Paddy Field", Journal of Korean society of soil science and fertilizer, 26(4), pp.314~333 (1993)
- Korea Forest Research Institute, "Studies on the Quantification of Welfare Functions of Forests", ~ (1991)
- Korea Forest Research Institute, "Studies on the Quantification of Welfare Functions of Forests(Ⅱ)", ~ (1992)
- Korea Forest Research Institute, "Studies on the Quantification of Welfare Functions of Forests(Ⅲ)", ~ (1993)
- Korea Rural Corporation, "A study on Economic Analysis and Estimation Guideline of Automated Agricultural Water Management", ~ (2006)
- Korea Rural Economic Institute, "A study on the Effect of Environmental Conservation on the Paddy agriculture", ~ (1995)
- Ministry of Construction & Transportation, "Study on the Improvement Method for Economic Analysis of Flood Control Project", ~ (2001)
- National Agricultural Cooperative Federation, "An Evaluated Analysis of Exterior Economic Effect on Paddy field", ~ (1993)
- Robert,J.B., "Applied Cost-Benefit Analysis", Edward publishing, ~ (1996)
- Sung,J.K., "Environmental Conservation and Rice Cultivation", Journal of Agriculture, 5, pp.26~33 (1991)