Necessity to Develop a Tool to Evaluate Activity of Daily Living for Electric Powered Indoor/Outdoor Chair Users
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objective To evaluate changes in activity of daily living before and after provision of electric-powered indoor/outdoor chair (EPIOC), discuss problems of current activities of daily living (ADL) evaluating tools for EPIOC users, and provide preliminary data to develop ADL evaluation tool for EPIOC user.Methods A total of 70 users who were prescribed EPIOC and had been using for more than 1 year were recruited in this study. Before and after provision of EPIOC, MBI and FIM scores were measured and a questionnaire consisting of six categories (general socioeconomic states, currently using state, whether EPIOC was helpful for social participation and occupational chances, psychiatric influences, self-reported degrees of independency, and barriers of using EPIOC) was used.Results No difference in MBI scores before and after provision of EPIOC was observed. However, the wheelchair ambulation category showed a significant difference. While motor FIM was not significantly different from MBI, FIM score were significantly (p<0.05) higher than MBI. For questions regarding social participation frequency, helpfulness of EPIOC on confidence, refreshing patients’ emotions and self-reported degrees of independence, all of them showed positive responses. Especially, EPIOC users’ self-reported degree of independency showed favorable results. There was discrepancy in MBI or FIM measured by physicians.Conclusion Our study showed that there was a gap between the existing ADL evaluation tool and the ADL level that EPIOC users were actually feeling. Thus, it is necessary to develop an evaluation tool specifically for EPIOC.
Abstract
Objective To evaluate changes in activity of daily living before and after provision of electric-powered indoor/outdoor chair (EPIOC), discuss problems of current activities of daily living (ADL) evaluating tools for EPIOC users, and provide preliminary data to develop ADL evaluation tool for EPIOC user.Methods A total of 70 users who were prescribed EPIOC and had been using for more than 1 year were recruited in this study. Before and after provision of EPIOC, MBI and FIM scores were measured and a questionnaire consisting of six categories (general socioeconomic states, currently using state, whether EPIOC was helpful for social participation and occupational chances, psychiatric influences, self-reported degrees of independency, and barriers of using EPIOC) was used.Results No difference in MBI scores before and after provision of EPIOC was observed. However, the wheelchair ambulation category showed a significant difference. While motor FIM was not significantly different from MBI, FIM score were significantly (p<0.05) higher than MBI. For questions regarding social participation frequency, helpfulness of EPIOC on confidence, refreshing patients’ emotions and self-reported degrees of independence, all of them showed positive responses. Especially, EPIOC users’ self-reported degree of independency showed favorable results. There was discrepancy in MBI or FIM measured by physicians.Conclusion Our study showed that there was a gap between the existing ADL evaluation tool and the ADL level that EPIOC users were actually feeling. Thus, it is necessary to develop an evaluation tool specifically for EPIOC.
참고문헌 (24)
- Batavia AI., "Of wheelchairs and managed care", Health Aff (Millwood), 18, pp.177~182 (1999)
- Kaye HS, "Mobility device use in the United States", National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research, US Department of Education, ~ (2000)
- Hosseini SM, "Manual wheelchair skills capacity predicts quality of life and community integration in persons with spinal cord injury", Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 93, pp.2237~2243 (2012)
- Frank AO, "Introduction of a new NHS electric-powered indoor", outdoor chair (EPIOC) service: benefits, risks and implications for prescribers, 2000, pp.14, 665~673
- Davies A, "Changes in the quality of life in severely disabled people following provision of powered indoor", outdoor chairs, 2003, pp.25, 286~290
- Evans S, "Young people’s experiences using electric powered indooroutdoor wheelchairs (EPIOCs): potential for enhancing users’ development?", Disabil Rehabil, 29, pp.1281~1294 (2007)
- de Morton NA, "Rasch analysis of the Barthel index in the assessment of hospitalized older patients after admission for an acute medical condition", Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 89, pp.641~647 (2008)
- Cress ME, "Physical functional performance in persons using a manual wheelchair", J Orthop Sports Phys Ther, 32, pp.104~113 (2002)
- Kirby RL, "The Wheelchair Skills Test: a pilot study of a new outcome measure", Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 83, pp.10~18 (2002)
- Marino RJ, "Development of a short-form quadriplegia index of function scale", Spinal Cord, 37, pp.289~296 (1999)
- Marino RJ, "The capabilities of upper extremity instrument: reliability and validity of a measure of functional limitation in tetraplegia", Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 79, pp.1512~1521 (1998)
- Catz A, "SCIM: spinal cord independence measure: a new disability scale for patients with spinal cord lesions", Spinal Cord, 35, pp.850~856 (1997)
- Wilkin D, "Measures of need and outcome for primary health care", Br J Gen Pract, 42, pp.262~ (1992)
- The Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation, "Guide for use of the Uniform data set for medical rehabilitation" (1990), State University of New York at Buffalo
- Shah S, "Improving the sensitivity of the Barthel Index for stroke rehabilitation", J Clin Epidemiol, 42, pp.703~709 (1989)
- Rosenberg DE, "Outdoor built environment barriers and facilitators to activity among midlife and older adults with mobility disabilities", Gerontologist, 53, pp.268~279 (2013)
- Stanley RK, "Development of a functional assessment measure for manual wheelchair users", J Rehabil Res Dev, 40, pp.301~307 (2003)
- Granger CV, "Advances in functional assessment for medical rehabilitation", Top Geriatr Rehabil, 1, pp.59~74 (1986)
- Nyein K, "Can a Barthel score be derived from the FIM?", Clin Rehabil, 13, pp.56~63 (1999)
- Turner-Stokes L, "Deriving a Barthel Index from the Northwick Park Dependency Scale and the Functional Independence Measure: are they equivalent?", Clin Rehabil, 24, pp.1121~1126 (2010)
- Tate D, "Predicting depression and psychological distress in persons with spinal cord injury based on indicators of handicap", Am J Phys Med Rehabil, 73, pp.175~183 (1994)
- Fuhrer MJ, "Depressive symptomatology in persons with spinal cord injury who reside in the community", Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 74, pp.255~260 (1993)
- Hobbs DA, "Developing a national research and development centre in assistive technologies for independent living", Aust Health Rev, 33, pp.152~160 (2009)
- Adya M, "Assistive", rehabilitation technology, disability, and service delivery models, 2012, pp.13(Suppl 1), S75~S78