본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Preprocedural cardiac computed tomography versus transesophageal echocardiography for planning left atrial appendage occlusion procedures

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류내과학

초록

The heterogeneous anatomy of the left atrial appendage (LAA) necessitates preprocedural imaging essential for planning of percutaneous LAA occlusion (LAAO) procedures. While transoesophageal echocardiography (TOE) remains the gold standard, cardiac computed tomography (CT) is becoming increasingly popular. To address the lack of consensus on the optimal imaging modality, we compared the outcomes of preprocedural TOE versus CT for LAAO procedure planning. A retrospective single-center cohort study of all LAAO procedures was performed to compare the outcomes of patients receiving preprocedural TOE versus those receiving CT. The primary outcome was procedural success and rate of major adverse events. The secondary outcomes were total procedure time, rate of device size change, and maximum landing zone diameter. A total of 64 patients was included. Of these, 25 (39.1%) underwent TOE and 39 (60.9%) underwent CT. There was no significant difference in the procedural success rate (96.0% vs. 100%, P = 0.39) or major adverse event rate (4.0% vs. 5.1%, P > 0.99) between TOE and CT patients. Compared with TOE, CT was associated with significantly shorter median procedure time (103 min vs. 124 min, P = 0.02) and a lower rate of device size change (7.7% vs. 28.0%, P = 0.04). Compared to CT, TOE was associated with a significantly smaller mean maximum landing zone diameter (20.8 mm vs. 25.8 mm, P < 0.01) and a higher rate of device upsizing (24.0% vs. 2.6%, P = 0.01). No significant difference in detected residual leak rates was found between TOE and CT (50.0% vs. 52.2%, P > 0.99). Planning of LAAO procedures with CT is associated with a shorter total procedure time and a lower rate of device size change and is less likely to underestimate the maximum landing zone diameter.

Abstract

The heterogeneous anatomy of the left atrial appendage (LAA) necessitates preprocedural imaging essential for planning of percutaneous LAA occlusion (LAAO) procedures. While transoesophageal echocardiography (TOE) remains the gold standard, cardiac computed tomography (CT) is becoming increasingly popular. To address the lack of consensus on the optimal imaging modality, we compared the outcomes of preprocedural TOE versus CT for LAAO procedure planning. A retrospective single-center cohort study of all LAAO procedures was performed to compare the outcomes of patients receiving preprocedural TOE versus those receiving CT. The primary outcome was procedural success and rate of major adverse events. The secondary outcomes were total procedure time, rate of device size change, and maximum landing zone diameter. A total of 64 patients was included. Of these, 25 (39.1%) underwent TOE and 39 (60.9%) underwent CT. There was no significant difference in the procedural success rate (96.0% vs. 100%, P = 0.39) or major adverse event rate (4.0% vs. 5.1%, P > 0.99) between TOE and CT patients. Compared with TOE, CT was associated with significantly shorter median procedure time (103 min vs. 124 min, P = 0.02) and a lower rate of device size change (7.7% vs. 28.0%, P = 0.04). Compared to CT, TOE was associated with a significantly smaller mean maximum landing zone diameter (20.8 mm vs. 25.8 mm, P < 0.01) and a higher rate of device upsizing (24.0% vs. 2.6%, P = 0.01). No significant difference in detected residual leak rates was found between TOE and CT (50.0% vs. 52.2%, P > 0.99). Planning of LAAO procedures with CT is associated with a shorter total procedure time and a lower rate of device size change and is less likely to underestimate the maximum landing zone diameter.

참고문헌 (24)

  1. Holmes DR, "A history of left atrial appendage occlusion", Interv Cardiol Clin, 7, pp.143~150 (2018)
  2. Hindricks G, "2020 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery(EACTS) : the Task Force for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation of the European Society of Cardiology(ESC)Developed with the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association(EHRA)of the ESC", Eur Heart J, 42, pp.373~498 (2021)
  3. January CT, "2019 AHA", ACC, ACC, pp.HRS guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation : a report of the American College of Cardiology, American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society in collaboration with the Society of Thoracic Surgeons[DOI]
  4. Lakkireddy DR, "NCDR left atrial appendage occlusion registry : the"watch"man has arrived", J Am Coll Cardiol, 75, pp.1519~1522 (2020)
  5. Reddy VY, "5-Year outcomes after left atrial appendage closure : from the PREVAIL and PROTECT AF trials", J Am Coll Cardiol, 70, pp.2964~2975 (2017)
  6. Osmancik P, "4-Year outcomes after left atrial appendage closure versus nonwarfarin oral anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation", J Am Coll Cardiol, 79, pp.1~14 (2022)
  7. Holmes DR, "Percutaneous closure of the left atrial appendage versus warfarin therapy for prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation : a randomised non-inferiority trial", Lancet, 374, pp.534~542 (2009)
  8. Holmes DR, "Prospective randomized evaluation of the Watchman Left Atrial Appendage Closure device in patients with atrial fibrillation versus long-term warfarin therapy : the PREVAIL trial", J Am Coll Cardiol, 64, pp.1~12 (2014)
  9. Korsholm K, "Expert recommendations on cardiac computed tomography for planning transcatheter left atrial appendage occlusion", JACC Cardiovasc Interv, 13, pp.277~292 (2020)
  10. Cho I, "Pre-procedural determination of device size in left atrial appendage occlusion using three-dimensional cardiac computed tomography", Sci Rep, 11, pp.24107~ (2021)
  11. Clemente A, "Multimodality imaging in preoperative assessment of left atrial appendage transcatheter occlusion with the Amplatzer Cardiac Plug", Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging, 16, pp.1276~1287 (2015)
  12. Saw J, "Comparing measurements of CT angiography, TEE, and fluoroscopy of the left atrial appendage for percutaneous closure", J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, 27, pp.414~422 (2016)
  13. Wang DD, "Application of 3-dimensional computed tomographic image guidance to WATCHMAN implantation and impact on early operator learning curve : single-center experience", JACC Cardiovasc Interv, 9, pp.2329~2340 (2016)
  14. Chow DH, "A comparative study of different imaging modalities for successful percutaneous left atrial appendage closure", Open Heart, 4, pp.e000627~ (2017)
  15. Tzikas A, "Left atrial appendage occlusion with the AMPLATZER Amulet device : an expert consensus step-by-step approach", EuroIntervention, 11, pp.1512~1521 (2016)
  16. Saw J, "Cardiac CT angiography for device surveillance after endovascular left atrial appendage closure", Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging, 16, pp.1198~1206 (2015)
  17. Ruile P, "Pre-procedural assessment of aortic annulus dimensions for transcatheter aortic valve replacement : comparison of a non-contrast 3D MRA protocol with contrast-enhanced cardiac dual-source CT angiography", Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging, 17, pp.458~466 (2016)
  18. Samaras A, "Residual leaks following percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion and outcomes : a meta-analysis", Eur Heart J, 45, pp.214~229 (2024)
  19. Su P, "Occluding the left atrial appendage : anatomical considerations", Heart, 94, pp.1166~1170 (2008)
  20. Rajwani A, "Left atrial appendage eccentricity and irregularity are associated with residual leaks after percutaneous closure", JACC Clin Electrophysiol, 1, pp.478~485 (2015)
  21. Spencer RJ, "Changes in left atrial appendage dimensions following volume loading during percutaneous left atrial appendage closure", JACC Cardiovasc Interv, 8, pp.1935~1941 (2015)
  22. So CY, "Additive value of preprocedural computed tomography planning versus stand-alone transesophageal echocardiogram guidance to left atrial appendage occlusion : comparison of real-world practice", J Am Heart Assoc, 10, pp.e020615~ (2021)
  23. Achenbach S, "SCCT expert consensus document on computed tomography imaging before transcatheter aortic valve implantation(TAVI)", transcatheter aortic valve replacement(TAVR), 2012, pp.6, 366~380
  24. Freixa X, "Left atrial appendage occlusion with the Amplatzer Amulet : update on device sizing", J Interv Card Electrophysiol, 59, pp.71~78 (2020)

관련 논문AI추천

A Comparative Study of Three Imaging Modalities for Size Selection of a Watchman Left Atrial Appendage Closure DeviceFei Wang, Ge-cai Chen, Li Zhu, Zhong-bao Ruan연세대학교의과대학 · Yonsei Medical Journal2022 · 제63권 제4호Predicting Peri-Device Leakage of Left Atrial Appendage Device Closure Using Novel Three-Dimensional Geometric CT Analysis김중선, 심지영, 심학준, 장양수, 장혁재, 전병관, 정남식, 정혜문, 조인정, 한동진, 홍그루한국심초음파학회 · Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging2015 · 제23권 제4호How Could Pre-Procedural Imaging Guide Successful Left Atrial Appendage Closure?윤지현한국심초음파학회 · Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging2015 · 제23권 제4호Left Atrial Appendage Characteristics Assessed with Cardiac Computed Tomography in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Severe Mitral Valve Disease김규, 이삭, 곽서연, 김영진, 서영주, 서지원, 심지영, 이승현, 이희정, 조익성, 하종원, 홍그루연세대학교의과대학 · Yonsei Medical Journal2025 · 제66권 제9호Morphological and functional assessment of the left atrial appendage in daily practice: a comprehensive approach using basic and advanced echocardiography with practical tipsAshraf M. Anwar한국심초음파학회 · Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging2024 · 제32권 Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion for the Prevention of Stroke in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: Review and Critical AppraisalGeorgios Tsivgoulis, Martin Köhrmann, Peter D. Schellinger, Thorsten Steiner대한뇌졸중학회 · 대한뇌졸중영문학회지2018 · 제20권 제3호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (39건)