본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

The Interplay of Receiving, Accepting, and Asking for Strokes and Iranian EFL Teachers’ Perceived Self-Efficacy

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

In educational settings, teacher-student relationships are considered significant for their influences on students’ learning and academic lives. Interpersonal skills, social persuasion, and stroking behavior, the recognition, attention or responsiveness that one person gives another (McKenna, 1974), can promote such a relationship and affect teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs. This study attempted to investigate the relationship and interaction between the frequency of strokes and the perceived selfefficacy of EFL teachers, considering their gender and level of experience. In order to collect data, 180 EFL teachers, both male and female with different years of experience, completed a booklet questionnaire consisting of demographic information, the Teacher Self-efficacy scale (Bandura, 2006; Skaalvik & Skaalvik, 2007; Tschannen-Moran & Woolfolk Hoy, 2001), and the Stroking Profile (McKenna, 1974). The results of the analysis, using a Spearman rho correlation, indicated a significantly strong positive correlation between the frequency of receiving and accepting positive strokes and the participants’ self-efficacy. There was also a strong negative correlation between frequency of receiving and accepting negative strokes and self-efficacy. However, the frequency of requesting strokes and self-efficacy was weak but significant for positive strokes but non-significant for negative ones. Overall, no difference was found for teachers’ self-efficacy with regard to stroke frequency across gender and years of experience. Further, the results of a factorial ANOVA demonstrated that no interaction existed among frequency of strokes, self-efficacy, gender, and EFL teachers’ experience levels. Hence, the more EFL teachers were provided with positive strokes, the higher their sense of self-efficacy would be. The findings imply that strokes, particularly positive strokes as a source of self-efficacy for EFL teachers, should be seriously taken into account.

Abstract

In educational settings, teacher-student relationships are considered significant for their influences on students’ learning and academic lives. Interpersonal skills, social persuasion, and stroking behavior, the recognition, attention or responsiveness that one person gives another (McKenna, 1974), can promote such a relationship and affect teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs. This study attempted to investigate the relationship and interaction between the frequency of strokes and the perceived selfefficacy of EFL teachers, considering their gender and level of experience. In order to collect data, 180 EFL teachers, both male and female with different years of experience, completed a booklet questionnaire consisting of demographic information, the Teacher Self-efficacy scale (Bandura, 2006; Skaalvik & Skaalvik, 2007; Tschannen-Moran & Woolfolk Hoy, 2001), and the Stroking Profile (McKenna, 1974). The results of the analysis, using a Spearman rho correlation, indicated a significantly strong positive correlation between the frequency of receiving and accepting positive strokes and the participants’ self-efficacy. There was also a strong negative correlation between frequency of receiving and accepting negative strokes and self-efficacy. However, the frequency of requesting strokes and self-efficacy was weak but significant for positive strokes but non-significant for negative ones. Overall, no difference was found for teachers’ self-efficacy with regard to stroke frequency across gender and years of experience. Further, the results of a factorial ANOVA demonstrated that no interaction existed among frequency of strokes, self-efficacy, gender, and EFL teachers’ experience levels. Hence, the more EFL teachers were provided with positive strokes, the higher their sense of self-efficacy would be. The findings imply that strokes, particularly positive strokes as a source of self-efficacy for EFL teachers, should be seriously taken into account.

참고문헌 (52)

  1. Akbari, R., "Iranian English teachers' self-efficacy: Do academic degree and experience make a difference?", Pazhuhesh-e Zabanha-ye Khareji, 56, pp.25~47 (2010)
  2. Albrecht, M. P., "A study of self-esteem and locus of control in fourth-and fifth grade boys using transactional analysis and self-awareness", Doctor, pp.1995
  3. Allen, J. G., "Stroking, existential position and mood in college students", Transactional Analysis Journal, 5(3), pp.227~233 (1975)[DOI]
  4. Allinder, R. M., "The relationships between efficacy and the instructional practices of special education teachers and consultants", Teacher Education and Special Education, 17(2), pp.86~95 (1994)[DOI]
  5. Allinder, R. M., "An examination of the relationship between teacher efficacy and curriculum-based measurement and student achievement", Remedial and Special Education, 16(4), pp.247~254 (1995)[DOI]
  6. Aydin, Y. C., "What predicts student teacher self-efficacy", Academic Exchange Quarterly, 9(4), pp.123~127 (2005)
  7. Bandura, A., "Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory" (1986), Prentice-Hall, Inc
  8. Bandura, A., "Self‐efficacy" (1994), John Wiley & Sons, Inc
  9. Bandura, A., "Self-efficacy: The exercise of control" (1997), Freeman
  10. Bandura, A., "Selfefficacy beliefs of adolescents", pp.307~337 (2006), IAP
  11. Berne, E., "Games people play: The psychology of human relationships" (1996), Penguin books
  12. Berne, E., "What do you say after you say hello" (2010), Random House
  13. Chacón, C. T., "Teachers’ perceived efficacy among English as a foreign language teachers in middle schools in Venezuela", Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(3), pp.257~272 (2005)[DOI]
  14. Dörnyei, Z., "Research methods in applied linguistics: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methodologies" (2011), Oxford University Press
  15. Farrell, T. S. C., "Novice-Service language teacher development: Bridging the gap between preservice and in-service education and development", TESOL Quarterly, 46(3), pp.435~449 (2012)[DOI]
  16. Gibson, S., "Teacher efficacy: A construct validation", Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(4), pp.569~582 (1984)[DOI]
  17. Glickman, C. D., "A comparison of first‐year, fifth‐year, and former teachers on efficacy, ego development, and problem solving", Psychology in the Schools, 19(4), pp.558~562 (1982)[DOI]
  18. Goldstein, L. S., "The relational zone: The role of caring relationships in the co‐construction of mind", American Educational Research Journal, 36(3), pp.647~673 (1999)[DOI]
  19. Guskey, T. R., "Teacher efficacy, self-concept, and attitudes toward the implementation of instructional innovation", Teaching and Teacher Education, 4(1), pp.63~69 (1988)[DOI]
  20. Hagen, K. M., "Using vicarious experience and verbal persuasion to enhance self-efficacy in pre-service teachers: “Priming the pump" for consultation", School Psychology Quarterly, 13(2), pp.169~178 (1998)[DOI]
  21. Hargreaves, A., "Changing teachers, changing times" (1994), Cassell
  22. Hatch, E. M., "The research manual: Design and statistics for applied linguistics" (1991), Newbury House Publishers
  23. "Novice teachers’ perceptions of their mentoring experiences" (2011)[URL]
  24. Heppner, M. J., "An empirical investigation of the effects of a teaching practicum on prospective faculty", Journal of Counseling & Development, 72(5), pp.500~507 (1994)[DOI]
  25. Hosseini, S., "EFL teachers’ perceptions of stroke and their application in class: A qualitative study", master, pp.2016
  26. Irajzad, F., "Examining the stroking behavior of English, Persian, and Arabic school teachers in Iran: A mixed-methods study", International Journal of Instruction, 10(1), pp.219~236 (2017)[DOI]
  27. McKenna, J, "Stroking profile : Application to script analysis", Transactional Analysis Journal, 4(4), pp.20~24 (1974)
  28. Morris, D. B., "Sources of award-winning professors’ self-efficacy: A qualitative investigation", pp.2009
  29. Morris, D. B., "Sources of teaching self-efficacy: A scale validation", Doctor, pp.2010
  30. "Overview of social cognitive theory and of self-efficacy" (2002)[URL]
  31. Palmer, D. H., "Sources of self-efficacy in a science methods course for primary teacher education students", Research in Science Education, 36(4), pp.337~353 (2006)[DOI]
  32. Pishghadam, R., "Development and validation of the student stroke scale and examining its relation with academic motivation", Studies in Educational Evaluation, 43(2), pp.109~114 (2014)[DOI]
  33. Rajabnejad, F., "On the influence of stroke on willingness to attend classes and foreign language achievement", Applied Research on English Language, 6(2), pp.141~158 (2017)
  34. Rastegar, M., "The relationship between emotional intelligence and self-efficacy among Iranian EFL teachers", System, 37(4), pp.700~707 (2009)[DOI]
  35. Payton, O. D., "Effects of TA instruction on empathy, self-esteem, control", Transactional Analysis Journal, 9(3), pp.200~204 (1979)[DOI]
  36. Shearn, N. W., "Sources of efficacy for first-year teachers", Doctor, pp.2007
  37. Skaalvik, E. M., "Dimensions of teacher self-efficacy and relations with strain factors, perceived collective teacher efficacy, and teacher burnout", Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(3), pp.611~625 (2007)[DOI]
  38. Solomon, C., "Transactional analysis theory: The basics", Transactional Analysis Journal, 33(1), pp.15~22 (2003)[DOI]
  39. Soodak, L. C., "Efficacy and experience: Perceptions of efficacy among preservice and practicing teachers", Journal of Research and Development in Education, 30(4), pp.214~221 (1997)
  40. Steiner, C. M., "Scripts people live" (1990), Groove Press
  41. Steiner, C. M., "Core concepts of a stroke-centered transactional analysis", Transactional Analysis Journal, 33(2), pp.178~181 (2003)[DOI]
  42. Stewart, I., "TA today: A new introduction to transactional analysis" (2008), Lifespace Pub
  43. Stronge, J. H., "Handbook for qualities of effective teachers" (2004), Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD)
  44. Timostsuk, I., "Primary science teaching- Is it integral and deep experience for students?", Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education, 7(1), pp.82~99 (2016)[DOI]
  45. Tschannen-Moran, M., "Teacher efficacy: Its meaning and measure", Review of Educational Research, 68(2), pp.202~248 (1998)[DOI]
  46. Tschannen-Moran, M., "Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct", Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(7), pp.783~805 (2001)[DOI]
  47. Tschannen-Moran, M., "The differential antecedents of self-efficacy beliefs of novice and experienced teachers", Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(6), pp.944~956 (2007)[DOI]
  48. Treat, R. J., "An additional note on the stroking profile", Transactional Analysis Journal, 7(3), pp.248~248 (1977)[DOI]
  49. Wheatley, K. F., "The case for reconceptualizing teacher efficacy research", Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(7), pp.747~766 (2005)[DOI]
  50. Woolfolk Hoy, A., "Changes in teacher efficacy during the early years of teaching: A Comparison of four measures", Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(4), pp.343~356 (2005)[DOI]
  51. Woollams, S., "Transactional analysis in brief" (1976), Huron Valley Institute
  52. Yazdan Pour, H., "Constructing and validating a teacher stroke scale and examining its relationship with burnout", master, pp.2015

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)