The Role of One-Year Endoscopic Follow-Up for the Esophageal Remnant and Gastric Conduit after Esophagectomy with Gastric Reconstruction for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: After esophagectomy and gastric reconstruction for esophageal cancer, patients suffer from various symptoms that can detract from quality of life. Endoscopy is a useful diagnostic tool for evaluating patients after esophagectomy. This observational study was performed to investigate the correlation between symptoms and endoscopic findings one year after esophageal surgery and to assess the clinical usefulness of one-year endoscopic follow-up. Materials and Methods: From 2001 to 2008, 162 patients who underwent esophagectomy with gastric reconstruction were endoscopically examined one year after operation. Results: Patients suffered from the following symptoms: nocturnal cough (n=10), regurgitation (n=7), cervical heartburn (n=3), lump sensation (n=2), dysphagia (n=20) and odynophagia (n=22). Eighty-five (52.5%) patients had abnormal findings on endoscopic examination. Twelve (7.4%) patients had reflux esophagitis, and 37 (22.8%) patients had an anastomotic stricture. Only stricture-related symptoms were correlated with the finding of anastomotic strictures (p<0.001). Two patients had recurrences at the anastomotic sites, and four patients had regional lymph node recurrences with gastric conduit invasion visualized by endoscopy. Newly-developed malignancies in the esophageal remnant or hypopharynx that were not detected by clinical symptoms and imaging studies were reported in two patients. Conclusion: One year after esophagectomy, endoscopic findings were not correlated with clinical symptoms, except those related to stricture. Routine endoscopic follow-up is a useful tool for identifying latent functional and oncological lesions.
Abstract
Purpose: After esophagectomy and gastric reconstruction for esophageal cancer, patients suffer from various symptoms that can detract from quality of life. Endoscopy is a useful diagnostic tool for evaluating patients after esophagectomy. This observational study was performed to investigate the correlation between symptoms and endoscopic findings one year after esophageal surgery and to assess the clinical usefulness of one-year endoscopic follow-up. Materials and Methods: From 2001 to 2008, 162 patients who underwent esophagectomy with gastric reconstruction were endoscopically examined one year after operation. Results: Patients suffered from the following symptoms: nocturnal cough (n=10), regurgitation (n=7), cervical heartburn (n=3), lump sensation (n=2), dysphagia (n=20) and odynophagia (n=22). Eighty-five (52.5%) patients had abnormal findings on endoscopic examination. Twelve (7.4%) patients had reflux esophagitis, and 37 (22.8%) patients had an anastomotic stricture. Only stricture-related symptoms were correlated with the finding of anastomotic strictures (p<0.001). Two patients had recurrences at the anastomotic sites, and four patients had regional lymph node recurrences with gastric conduit invasion visualized by endoscopy. Newly-developed malignancies in the esophageal remnant or hypopharynx that were not detected by clinical symptoms and imaging studies were reported in two patients. Conclusion: One year after esophagectomy, endoscopic findings were not correlated with clinical symptoms, except those related to stricture. Routine endoscopic follow-up is a useful tool for identifying latent functional and oncological lesions.
참고문헌 (19)
- McLarty AJ, "Esophageal resection for cancer of the esophagus:long-term function and quality of life", Ann Thorac Surg, 63, pp.1568~1572 (1997)
- Yuasa N, "Acid and duodenogastroesophageal reflux after esophagectomy with gastric tube reconstruction", Am J Gastroenterol, 100, pp.1021~1027 (2005)
- Johansson J, "Impact of proton pump inhibitors on benign anastomotic stricture formations after esophagectomy and gastric tube reconstruction: results from a randomized clinical trial", Ann Surg, 250, pp.667~673 (2009)
- Motoyama S, "Prospective endoscopic follow-up results of reconstructed gastric tube", Hepatogastroenterology, 50, pp.666~669 (2003)
- Lee HS, "Intrathoracic gastric emptying of solid food after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer", Ann Thorac Surg, 80, pp.443~447 (2005)
- Armstrong D, "Endoscopic evaluation of gastro-esophageal reflux disease", Yale J Biol Med, 72, pp.93~100 (1999)
- Gutschow C, "Denervated stomach as an esophageal substitute recovers intraluminal acidity with time", Ann Surg, 233, pp.509~514 (2001)
- Shibuya S, "High incidence of reflux esophagitis observed by routine endoscopic examination after gastric pull-up esophagectomy", World J Surg, 27, pp.580~583 (2003)
- Bemelman WA, "A physical model of the intrathoracic stomach", Am J Physiol, 254(2), pp.G168~G175 (1988)
- Matsubara T, "Localization of initial lymph node metastasis from carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus", Cancer, 89, pp.1869~1873 (2000)
- D’Journo XB, "Mucosal damage in the esophageal remnant after esophagectomy and gastric transposition", Ann Surg, 249, pp.262~268 (2009)
- Rice TW, "Fate of the esophagogastric anastomosis", J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 141, pp.875~880 (2011)
- Orringer MB, "Eliminating the cervical esophagogastric anastomotic leak with a side-to-side stapled anastomosis", J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 119, pp.277~288 (2000)
- Williams VA, "Endoscopic and symptomatic assessment of anastomotic strictures following esophagectomy and cervical esophagogastrostomy", Surg Endosc, 22, pp.1470~1476 (2008)
- Kim HK, "Endoscopic evaluation of the quality of the anastomosis after esophagectomy with gastric tube reconstruction", World J Surg, 32, pp.2010~2014 (2008)
- Orringer MB, "Transhiatal esophagectomy: clinical experience and refinements", Ann Surg, 230, pp.392~400 (1999)
- Orringer MB, "Early dilation in the treatment of esophageal disruption", Ann Thorac Surg, 42, pp.536~539 (1986)
- Ali T, "Long-term safety concerns with proton pump inhibitors", Am J Med, 122, pp.896~903 (2009)
- Eom CS, "Use of acid-suppressive drugs and risk of fracture: a meta-analysis of observational studies", Ann Fam Med, 9, pp.257~267 (2011)