한국어판 두통영향 검사(Headache Impact Test-6)의 타당도 및 신뢰도 조사
Validity and Reliability Assessment of Korean Headache Impact Test-6 (HIT-6)
1
조회
0
다운로드
44
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Background: Quality-of-life measurement represents an important tool for evaluating the management and impact of headache on individuals and society. The Headache Impact Test-6 (HIT-6) is a simple instrument developed to assess headache-related disability in Western countries. The objective of this study was to determine the reliability and validity of the Korean HIT-6. Methods: Participants were recruited from patients who visited the Neurology Clinic of Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital due to headache. The survey included the SF-36 and HIT-6. Headache diagnosis was assigned using ICHD-Ⅱ after completing a semistructured diagnostic interview. Results: A total of 43 patients were recruited, who were aged 35.2±13.6 years (mean±SD). Thirty-three and three were diagnosed as having migraine and probable migraine, respectively. Eight and two were diagnosed with tension-type and probable tension-type headache, respectively. There was a negative correlation between the total SF-36 and HIT-6 scores (Spearman’s correlation coefficient=-0.64, p<0.01). Similar significant negative correlations were also observed between SF-36 physical health summary and HIT-6 scores (Spearman’s correlation coefficient=-0.54, p<0.01), and between SF-36 mental summary and HIT-6 scores (Spearman’s correlation coefficient=-0.60, p<0.01). The Cronbach’s alpha of HIT-6 was 0.85. Conclusions: The Korean HIT-6 is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing headache-related quality of life.
Abstract
Background: Quality-of-life measurement represents an important tool for evaluating the management and impact of headache on individuals and society. The Headache Impact Test-6 (HIT-6) is a simple instrument developed to assess headache-related disability in Western countries. The objective of this study was to determine the reliability and validity of the Korean HIT-6. Methods: Participants were recruited from patients who visited the Neurology Clinic of Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital due to headache. The survey included the SF-36 and HIT-6. Headache diagnosis was assigned using ICHD-Ⅱ after completing a semistructured diagnostic interview. Results: A total of 43 patients were recruited, who were aged 35.2±13.6 years (mean±SD). Thirty-three and three were diagnosed as having migraine and probable migraine, respectively. Eight and two were diagnosed with tension-type and probable tension-type headache, respectively. There was a negative correlation between the total SF-36 and HIT-6 scores (Spearman’s correlation coefficient=-0.64, p<0.01). Similar significant negative correlations were also observed between SF-36 physical health summary and HIT-6 scores (Spearman’s correlation coefficient=-0.54, p<0.01), and between SF-36 mental summary and HIT-6 scores (Spearman’s correlation coefficient=-0.60, p<0.01). The Cronbach’s alpha of HIT-6 was 0.85. Conclusions: The Korean HIT-6 is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing headache-related quality of life.
참고문헌 (21)
- 서우근, "안산 시민들의 두통 역학조사", 대한신경과학회지, 20(5), pp.479~485 (2002), 대한신경과학회
- Jensen R, "Epidemiology and comorbidity of headache", Lancet Neurol, 7, pp.354~361 (2008)
- Stovner Lj, "The global burden of headache: a documentation of headache prevalence and disability worldwide", Cephalalgia, 27, pp.193~210 (2007)
- Dowson AJ, "Assessing the impact of migraine", Curr Med Res Opin, 17, pp.298~309 (2001)
- Osterhaus JT, "Measuring the functional status and well-being of patients with migraine headache", Headache, 34, pp.337~343 (1994)
- Anderson RT, "Critical review of the international assessments of health-related quality of life", Qual Life Res, 2, pp.369~395 (1993)
- Stewart WF, "An international study to assess reliability of the Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) score", Neurology, 53, pp.988~994 (1999)
- Lee HS, "The reliability and validity of the MIDAS (Migraine Disability Assessment) questionnaire for Korean migraine Sufferers", J Korean Neurol Assoc, 18, pp.287~291 (2000)
- Jacobson GP, "Headache disability inventory (HDI): short-term test-retest reliability and spouse perceptions", Headache, 35, pp.534~539 (1995)
- Wagner TH, "A new instrument to assess the long-term quality of life effects from migraine: development and psychometric testing of the MSQOL", Headache, 36, pp.484~492 (1996)
- Stewart WF, "Reliability of an illness severity measure for headache in a population sample of migraine sufferers", Cephalalgia, 18, pp.44~51 (1998)
- Bayliss MS, "A study of the feasibility of Internet administration of a computerized health survey: the headache impact test (HIT)", Qual Life Res, 12, pp.953~961 (2003)
- Kosinski M, "A six-item short-form survey for measuring headache impact: the HIT-6", Qual Life Res, 12, pp.963~974 (2003)
- Nachit-Ouinekh F, "Use of the headache impact test (HIT-6) in general practice: relationship with quality of life and severity", Eur J Neurol, 12, pp.189~193 (2005)
- De Diego EV, "Recognition and management of migraine in primary care: influence of functional impact measured by the headache impact test (HIT)", Cephalalgia, 25, pp.184~190 (2005)
- Nam BH, "Testing the validity of the Korean SF-36 health survey", J Kor Society of Health Statics, 28, pp.3~24 (2003)
- Ware JE, "SF-36 Physical and Mental Health Summary Scales: A Manual for Users of Version 1. 2nd ed", pp.1~238 (2003), QualityMetric Incorporated
- Gandek B, "Translating the Short-Form Headache Impact Test (HIT-6) in 27 countries: methodological and conceptual issues", Qual Life Res, 12, pp.975~979 (2003)
- Martin M, "The Short-Form Headache Impact Test (HIT-6) was psychometrically equivalent in nine languages", J Clin Epidemiol, 57, pp.1271~1278 (2004)
- Kawata AK, "Psychometric properties of the HIT-6 among patients in a headache-specialty practice", Headache, 45, pp.638~643 (2005)
- McHorney CA, "The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): III. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups", Med Care, 32, pp.40~66 (1994)