본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

이전가격분석과 비교가능성 요인의 유효성- 국내 도매업체를 중심으로 -

A Study on the Comparability FactorsRelated to Transfer Pricing Analysis- An Empirical Analysis Using Korean Distributors -

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

The objective of this study is to contribute to the improvement of reliability of a transfer pricing analysis through confirming the basis of the arm’s length principle and verifying the effectiveness of comparability factors. In order to identify the current comparability factors, a case study has been conducted using 20 different transfer pricing analyses from pharmaceutical, luxury brands, semi-conductor and chemical industries. For the empirical study, a research model using independent variables of intercompany sales-to-total sales rato (INTs), intercompany purchase-to-COGS ratio (INTp), sales volume (lnSale), selling expenses-to-sales ratio (ADP) Selling expenses include advertising expenses, promotional expenses, sales commission and entertainment expenses. , personnel costs-to-sales ratio (PSNL), education and training expenses-to-sales ratio (EDT), inventory risks (INVr) Inventory risks have been measured by adding the losses (net of gains) from inventory valuation to the actual inventory losses. and net working capital-to-sales ratio (NWC), has been designed based on the results of such case study. The multiple regression analysis was used to determine whether the above independent variables (i.e., comparability factors) are statistically linked to the profit level indicators (i.e., dependant variables) such as gross margin (GM), operating margin (OM) and Berry ratio (BR), which are generally considered in a transfer pricing analysis for distributors. The 546 samples (distributors) were narrowed down from a total sample size of 2,522 companies. In order to eliminate certain outlier, the Tukey adjustment has been applied. The period for this analysis was 10 years (1999-2008). The results of the study can be summarized as below:First, there were certain cases where INTp was statistically significant to the profit level indicators, which implies that certain intercompany transactions may not be conducted on an arm’s length basis. Thus, we may say that the arm’s length principle at least has certain grounds. Second, PSNL and NWC were confirmed as effective comparability factors. Identifying and confirming PSNL, which has not been generally considered as an effective comparability factor, may have significant implications for the current practice of transfer pricing analysis. In addition, NWC was also statistically linked to the profit level indicators, which implies that the working capital adjustment applied in a transfer pricing analysis is also meaningful. Third, lnSale, EDT and ADP showed inconsistent results. Thus, these factors should be carefully applied in a transfer pricing analysis considering the characteristics of the relevant industry under question. In addition, INVr was not confirmed as an effective comparability factor. Fourth, it was confirmed that the Berry ratio would not be an appropriate profit level indicator for a transfer pricing analysis for ordinary distributors other than those with simple functions or service providers. Fifth, the results of the empirical study for a large-pool of distributors covering all items were different from those for small-pools of each item. In general, the bigger number of samples, the more statistically meaningful results. Thus, even if OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines states “quantity does not make up for poor quality of data” (Paragraph 1.51), the results of this study show that increasing the number of samples (i.e., comparables) may still be helpful in improving the reliability of analysis under the situation where it is practically difficult to obtain sufficient samples considered to be of good quality. Notwithstanding the above, this study has the following limitations:First, this study tried to develop grounds for research model based on the results of a case study using actual transfer pricing analyses. Thus, the research model may not have a strong theoretical basis. In addition, the model may have an issue of ‘correlated omitted variable,’ which may be an inherent problem of transfer pricing analysis, but such omitted variables need to be further reviewed. Second, this study is conducted based on a statistical analysis using a large-pool of samples. Thus, considering that the actual transfer pricing analysis is generally conducted using a relatively small number of comparables, there can be certain limitations in generalizing the results of this empirical study.

Abstract

The objective of this study is to contribute to the improvement of reliability of a transfer pricing analysis through confirming the basis of the arm’s length principle and verifying the effectiveness of comparability factors. In order to identify the current comparability factors, a case study has been conducted using 20 different transfer pricing analyses from pharmaceutical, luxury brands, semi-conductor and chemical industries. For the empirical study, a research model using independent variables of intercompany sales-to-total sales rato (INTs), intercompany purchase-to-COGS ratio (INTp), sales volume (lnSale), selling expenses-to-sales ratio (ADP) Selling expenses include advertising expenses, promotional expenses, sales commission and entertainment expenses. , personnel costs-to-sales ratio (PSNL), education and training expenses-to-sales ratio (EDT), inventory risks (INVr) Inventory risks have been measured by adding the losses (net of gains) from inventory valuation to the actual inventory losses. and net working capital-to-sales ratio (NWC), has been designed based on the results of such case study. The multiple regression analysis was used to determine whether the above independent variables (i.e., comparability factors) are statistically linked to the profit level indicators (i.e., dependant variables) such as gross margin (GM), operating margin (OM) and Berry ratio (BR), which are generally considered in a transfer pricing analysis for distributors. The 546 samples (distributors) were narrowed down from a total sample size of 2,522 companies. In order to eliminate certain outlier, the Tukey adjustment has been applied. The period for this analysis was 10 years (1999-2008). The results of the study can be summarized as below:First, there were certain cases where INTp was statistically significant to the profit level indicators, which implies that certain intercompany transactions may not be conducted on an arm’s length basis. Thus, we may say that the arm’s length principle at least has certain grounds. Second, PSNL and NWC were confirmed as effective comparability factors. Identifying and confirming PSNL, which has not been generally considered as an effective comparability factor, may have significant implications for the current practice of transfer pricing analysis. In addition, NWC was also statistically linked to the profit level indicators, which implies that the working capital adjustment applied in a transfer pricing analysis is also meaningful. Third, lnSale, EDT and ADP showed inconsistent results. Thus, these factors should be carefully applied in a transfer pricing analysis considering the characteristics of the relevant industry under question. In addition, INVr was not confirmed as an effective comparability factor. Fourth, it was confirmed that the Berry ratio would not be an appropriate profit level indicator for a transfer pricing analysis for ordinary distributors other than those with simple functions or service providers. Fifth, the results of the empirical study for a large-pool of distributors covering all items were different from those for small-pools of each item. In general, the bigger number of samples, the more statistically meaningful results. Thus, even if OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines states “quantity does not make up for poor quality of data” (Paragraph 1.51), the results of this study show that increasing the number of samples (i.e., comparables) may still be helpful in improving the reliability of analysis under the situation where it is practically difficult to obtain sufficient samples considered to be of good quality. Notwithstanding the above, this study has the following limitations:First, this study tried to develop grounds for research model based on the results of a case study using actual transfer pricing analyses. Thus, the research model may not have a strong theoretical basis. In addition, the model may have an issue of ‘correlated omitted variable,’ which may be an inherent problem of transfer pricing analysis, but such omitted variables need to be further reviewed. Second, this study is conducted based on a statistical analysis using a large-pool of samples. Thus, considering that the actual transfer pricing analysis is generally conducted using a relatively small number of comparables, there can be certain limitations in generalizing the results of this empirical study.

참고문헌 (37)

  1. 고종권, "다국적기업의 이전가격을 이용한 소득이전과 조세최소화", 회계학연구, 25(2), pp.51~77 (2000)
  2. 국세청, "이전가격세제의 이해와 과세사례", ~ (2004)
  3. 김경자, "다국적기업의 국제이전가격조작에 관한 실증적 연구", 산업경제연구, 14(4), pp.25~39 (2001)
  4. 金孟和, "게임이론을 이용한 이전가격의 협상과정에 관한 연구", 박사, 경영학, pp.1994
  5. 김문태, "교육훈련비의 다기간 누적효과가 기업성과에 미치는 영향", 재무와 회계정보저널, 11(3), pp.107~129 (2011), 한국회계정보학회
  6. 김진배, "다국적기업의 이전가격결정에 영향을 미치는 요인과 사례분석", 관리회계연구, 5(2), pp.139~158 (2005)
  7. 노준화, "국가간 세부담 차이가 소득이전에 미치는 영향: 이전가격을 중심으로", 회계학연구, 22(4), pp.221~251 (1997)
  8. 박경열, "이전가격과 세제" (1995), 세경사
  9. 박종성, "이전가격 결정방법이 소득이전에 미치는 영향", 세무학연구, 24(4), pp.157~179 (2007), 한국세무학회
  10. 송우용, "다국적기업의 전략 및 환경특성이 국제이전가격 결정에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구", 국제경영리뷰, 6(2), pp.113~134 (2002)
  11. 신건권, "교육훈련비가 기업의 경영성과에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구-패널분석을 중심으로-", 회계정보연구, 21, pp.173~185 (2003), 한국회계정보학회
  12. 吳埈錫, "게임理論을 應用한 多國籍 企業의 情報不均衡下 移轉價格稅制 協商 Mechanism 硏究", 박사, 경영학, pp.1997
  13. 이만우, "외국인지분율과 내부거래가 소득이전에 미치는 영향", 경영학연구, 27(4), pp.891~909 (1998)
  14. 이영섭, "외국인 투자기업의 이전가격을 이용한 소득이전에 관한 실증 연구", 박사, 회계학, pp.2002
  15. 이영한, "외국인 투자기업의 조세회피에 관한 연구 : 해외관계사 내부거래를 중심으로", 회계학연구, 31(3), pp.285~317 (2006), 한국회계학회
  16. 이인재, "국제이전가격의 환경요인과 조세회피성향의 관계에 관한 실증연구", 세무학연구, (6), pp.23~63 (1995)
  17. 이인재, "국제이전가격의 결정요인 연구", 세무회계연구, 5(1), pp.69~93 (1998)
  18. 이정기, "국제이전가격결정과 조세대응에 관한 연구", 세무학연구, (13), pp.373~402 (1999)
  19. 이정기, "조세와 기업규모가 국제이전가격결정에 미치는 영향", 세무학연구, 18(3), pp.121~137 (2002)
  20. 이찬기, "이전가격을 이용한 소득이전의 조세유인에 관한 실증적 연구", 박사, 회계학, pp.2003
  21. 이창희, "세법강의" (2011), 박영사
  22. 전태영, "우리나라 기업의 국제이전가격 결정에 관한 경험적 연구", 세무학연구, (9), pp.283~314 (1997)
  23. 전태영, "기업특성에 따른 국제이전가격의 결정요인", 세무학연구, 25(2), pp.139~162 (2008), 한국세무학회
  24. 최정욱, "이전가격관련 비교가능성 분석에 관한 실증연구", 회계정보연구, 28(4), pp.347~373 (2010), 한국회계정보학회
  25. The Rise and Fall of Arm’s Length: A Study in the Evolution of U.S. Multinational Taxation, "Avi-Yonah", University of Michigan Law & Economics, ~, pp.Olin Working Paper No. 07-017 (2007)
  26. Broomhall, David, "SG&A and Distributor Profits in Transfer Pricing", Transfer Pricing Report, 16, pp.288~ (2007)
  27. Clark, Richard A, "Choosing a Reliable Profit Level Indicator", Transfer Pricing Report, 5, pp.986~ (1997)
  28. Collins J., "Cross-jurisdictional income shifting and earnings valuation", Journal of Accounting Research, 36(2), pp.209~229 (1998)
  29. Grubert, Harry, "Taxes, tariffs and transfer pricing in multinational corporate decision making", The Review of Economics and Statistics, 73(2), pp.285~293 (1991)
  30. Harris, David G., "The Impact of U.S. Tax Law Revision on Multinational Corporations’ Capital Location and Income-Shifting Decisions", Journal of Accounting Research, 31, pp.111~140 (1993)
  31. Jacob, J., "Taxes and transfer pricing: income shifting and the volume of intra firm transfers", Journal of Accounting Research, 34(2), pp.301~312 (1996)
  32. Klassen, Kenneth, "Geographic Income Shifting by Multinational Corporations in Response to Tax Rate Changes", Journal of Accounting Research, 31, pp.141~173 (1993)
  33. Larson, Charles R, "Comparability Adjustments in Transfer Pricing, In Transfer Pricing Handbook" (2001), John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  34. McDonald, Michael, "SG&A Spending and its Impact on Distributor Profitability", Transfer Pricing Report, 8, pp.725~ (1999)
  35. OECD, "Model Tax Convention on Income and on Capital", ~ (2003)
  36. OECD, "Transfer Pricing Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises and Tax Administrations", ~ (2010)
  37. Rodriguez, A.E., "Examining Unintended Effects from Using the SG&A Intensity Ratio to Screen Wholesalers", Transfer Pricing Report, 8, pp.251~ (1999)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)