“Chinese” Philosophy or “The-Chinese- Language” Philosophy?
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper offers an analytical and critical examination of the on-going discussion since the turn of the twenty-first century in China on hanyu zhexue 漢語哲學. Since people engaging in the hanyu zhexue discourse are often confused, the paper tries to articulate and differentiate various different theses in the discourse, clarifying conceptual confusions, uncovering hidden presuppositions, and showing which theses are false, which ones are true, and which ones are undetermined. Clarifications and arguments are made based on my previous works done in philosophy of language, pragmatics, comparative philosophy, Chinese philosophy of language, and the study of classics (jingxue 經學). This paper sketches out a larger conceptual and historical landscape, in which the hanyu zhexue discourse can be located. It also points out places where the battles can be fought, hidden paths found, and arguments and counter-arguments made. It concludes that the term “zhongguo zhexue 中國哲學” (Chinese philosophy) should not be jettisoned, and replaced by the term“hanyu zhexue 漢語哲學,” as it has been proposed by many people.
Abstract
This paper offers an analytical and critical examination of the on-going discussion since the turn of the twenty-first century in China on hanyu zhexue 漢語哲學. Since people engaging in the hanyu zhexue discourse are often confused, the paper tries to articulate and differentiate various different theses in the discourse, clarifying conceptual confusions, uncovering hidden presuppositions, and showing which theses are false, which ones are true, and which ones are undetermined. Clarifications and arguments are made based on my previous works done in philosophy of language, pragmatics, comparative philosophy, Chinese philosophy of language, and the study of classics (jingxue 經學). This paper sketches out a larger conceptual and historical landscape, in which the hanyu zhexue discourse can be located. It also points out places where the battles can be fought, hidden paths found, and arguments and counter-arguments made. It concludes that the term “zhongguo zhexue 中國哲學” (Chinese philosophy) should not be jettisoned, and replaced by the term“hanyu zhexue 漢語哲學,” as it has been proposed by many people.
참고문헌 (12)
- Collins, Randall, "The Sociology of Philosophies: A Global Theory of Intellectual Change" (1998), Harvard University Press
- Lloyd, Geoffrey, "The Way and the Word: Science and Medicine in Early China and Greece" (2003), Yale University Press
- Liu, Liangjian, "Hanyuyan zhexue fafan 漢語言哲學發凡 (Introduction to Hanyuyan Philosophy)" (2015), Higher Education Publishing House
- Sikka, Sonia, "Herder on Humanity and Cultural Difference: Enlighten Relativism" (2011), Cambridge University Press
- Sivin, Nathan, "Kexueshi fangfalun jiangyanlu 科學史方法論講演錄 (Lectures on the History of Science Methodology)" (2011), Peking University Press
- Taylor, Charles, "The Ethics of Authenticity" (1991), Harvard University Press
- Xiao, Yang, "The Pragmatic Turn: Articulating Communicative Practice in the Analects", Oriens Extremus, 45, pp.235~254 (2005)
- Xiao, Yang, "Davidson’s Philosophy and Chinese Philosophy: Constructive Engagement", pp.247~268 (2006), Brill
- Xiao, Yang, "How Confucius Does Things with Words: Two Paradigms of Hermeneutic Practice in the Analects and Its Exegeses", Journal of Asian Studies, 66(2), pp.497~532 (2007)
- Xiao, Yang, "Holding an Aristotelian Mirror for Confucian Ethics? On Yu Jiyuan’s The Ethics of Confucius and Aristotle: Mirrors of Virtue", Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy, 10(3), pp.359~375 (2011)
- Xiao, Yang, "Philosophy of Language, Chinese Lan- guage, Chinese Philosophy", pp.495~513 (2018), Brill
- Xiao, Yang, "Zhongguo zhexue yu hanyu zhexue", 中國哲學與漢語哲學 (Chinese Philosophy and the-Chinese-Language Philosophy). Xueshu yuekan 學術月刊 (Academic Monthly)