본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

The ‘Pay for Luck’ Puzzle: A Macroeconomist’s View

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류경제학

초록

The present study considers a model of delegated management where risk-averse shareholders delegate their firm’s management to self-interested executives/ managers, but within the general equilibrium context of Pigouvian cycles. A socially optimal class of managers’ renumeration contracts is identified in this Pigouvian environment where business fluctuations could be driven by private-sector expectations that are unrelated to economic fundamentals. These general equilibrium considerations have two primary implications. First, the “pay-for-luck” phenomenon, largely emphasized in the executive compensation literature, arises as an aggregate equilibrium outcome, thereby providing a corollary resolution of the corresponding “pay-for-luck” puzzle. While rendering the CEO-to-worker pay ratio essentially irrelevant to social welfare, the delegated management economy with the manager’s first-best compensation contracts may produce economy-wide welfare losses more than one order of magnitude larger that the Lucasian cost-of-business-cycle estimate, which constitutes a second point.

Abstract

The present study considers a model of delegated management where risk-averse shareholders delegate their firm’s management to self-interested executives/ managers, but within the general equilibrium context of Pigouvian cycles. A socially optimal class of managers’ renumeration contracts is identified in this Pigouvian environment where business fluctuations could be driven by private-sector expectations that are unrelated to economic fundamentals. These general equilibrium considerations have two primary implications. First, the “pay-for-luck” phenomenon, largely emphasized in the executive compensation literature, arises as an aggregate equilibrium outcome, thereby providing a corollary resolution of the corresponding “pay-for-luck” puzzle. While rendering the CEO-to-worker pay ratio essentially irrelevant to social welfare, the delegated management economy with the manager’s first-best compensation contracts may produce economy-wide welfare losses more than one order of magnitude larger that the Lucasian cost-of-business-cycle estimate, which constitutes a second point.

참고문헌 (27)

  1. Andreasen, M., "On the Effects of Rare Disasters and Uncertainty Shocks for Risk Premia in Non-linear DSGE Models", Review of Economic Dynamics, 15, pp.295~316 (2012)
  2. Bertrand, M., "Enjoying the Quiet Life? Corporate Governance and Managerial Preferences", Journal of Political Economy, 111, pp.1043~1075 (2003)
  3. Chari, V. V., "Business Cycle Accounting", Econometrica, 75, pp.781~836 (2007)
  4. Cho, J. O., "Business Cycle Uncertainty and Economic Welfare", Review of Economic Dynamics, 18, pp.185~200 (2015)
  5. Christiano, L. J., "Nominal Rigidities and the Dynamic Effects of a Shock to Monetary Policy", Journal of Political Economy, 113, pp.1~45 (2005)
  6. Monetary Policy and Stock Market Booms, "Christiano, L. J.", NBER, ~, pp.NBER Working Paper 16402 (2010)
  7. Cooley, T. F., "Frontiers of Business Cycle Research", pp.1~38 (1995), Princeton University Press
  8. Danthine, J. P., "Executive Compensation: A General Equilibrium Perspective", Review of Economic Dynamics, 18, pp.269~286 (2015)
  9. Executive Compensation: Inconvenient Truths, "Donaldson, J. B.", ~ (2023)
  10. The Costs of Pigouvian Cycles, "Donaldson, J. B.", ~ (2022)
  11. Fisher, J., "The Dynamic Effects of Neutral and Investment-specific Technology Shocks", Journal of Political Economy, 114, pp.413~451 (2006)
  12. Garvey, G., "Asymmetric Benchmarking in Compensation: Executives Are Rewarded for Good Luck but not Penalized for Bad", Journal of Financial Economics, 82, pp.197~225 (2006)
  13. Greenwood, J., "The Role of Investment-specific Technological Change in the Business Cycle", European Economic Review, 44, pp.91~115 (2000)
  14. Guvenen, F., "A Parsimonious Model for Asset Pricing", Econometrica, 77, pp.1711~1750 (2009)
  15. Hansen, G., "Indivisible Labor and the Business Cycle", Journal of Monetary Economics, 16, pp.309~327 (1985)
  16. Jaimovich, N., "Can news about the future drive the business cycle?", American Economic Review, 99, pp.1097~1118 (2009)
  17. Kaltenbrunner, G., "Long Run Risk through Consumption Smoothing", Review of Financial Studies, 23, pp.3190~3224 (2010)
  18. 김형석, "A Model of Delegated Management", Korean Social Science Journal, 50(1), pp.19~37 (2023), 한국사회과학협의회[DOI]
  19. 김준형, "금융시장의 비완비성을 고려한 경기변동의 후생비용 I", 계량경제학보, 25(2), pp.40~59 (2014), 한국계량경제학회[DOI]
  20. 김형석, "수요충격을 고려한 경기변동의 후생비용", 계량경제학보, 30(2), pp.55~75 (2019), 한국계량경제학회[DOI]
  21. Kydland, F. E., "Time to Build and Aggregate Fluctuations", Econometrica, 50, pp.1345~1370 (1982)
  22. Lucas, R. E., "Models of Business Cycles" (1987), Basil Blackwell
  23. Lucas, R. E., "Macroeconomic Priorities", American Economic Review, 93, pp.233~247 (2003)
  24. Mehra, R., "The Equity Premium: A Puzzle", Journal of Monetary Economics, 22, pp.145~161 (1985)
  25. Prescott, E. C., "Theory Ahead of Business-Cycle Measurement", Carnegie-Rochester Conference on Public Policy, 24, pp.11~44 (1986)
  26. Prescott, E. C., "Pareto Optima and Competitive Equilibria with Adverse Selection and Moral Hazard", Econometrica, 52, pp.21~45 (1984)
  27. Schmitt-Grohe, S., "What’s News In Business Cycles", Econometrica, 80, pp.2733~2764 (2012)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (3건)