본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

해방 이후 남북한의 공군력 인식과한국전쟁 준비과정

The Korean War Readiness Courses and An Air Power Recognition of the North and South Koreas after the Liberation

0

조회

0

다운로드

8

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류역사학

초록

This research recognize the air power as the key point element of the Korean War, and analyze the war readiness course and the recognition about the Air Forces of North and South Koreas. A subject period of the study distinguishes the Korean War from the rule period of Japan based on the liberation. To strengthen the air power at the rule period of Japan was carried out with the colonization rule and in the method of the war readiness. Japan made many airplane to accomplish the war and made the airport at the Korean Peninsula. Korea was mobilized in this course at an aircraft manufacture and airport construction. Korea had high concern about the air from 1900 and grasped the current situation about the air force of a big power and predicted a future air war. The recognition about the air power of Korea was connected to independent movement. The independence group trained the pilot and applied the air power at independent movement. The air asset and the recognition about the Air Force was utilized for the air force construction which is formed at a rule period of Japan. The Air Force of the Republic of Korea (ROK) after the liberation failed though it tried the receipt of the airplane to be left. But, North Korea took the action such as quick receipt of the airplane and the Sineuiju Air Unit establishment. North Korea began the Korean War from the situation which the air power is superior compared with the ROK finally. The ROK coped with return of the US Forces in Korea and requested the support of active air power in America. The USA emphasized the economy assistance than the soldier assistance of the Air Force about Korea. The USA evaluated the meaning of Korea which is the international politics relatively so that it was low. Especially the USA recognized negatively about the going north unity which the Korean Government insists. The Korean Government propelled an air power increase which is the oneself as soon as an air power enhance requirement about America failed. Syngman Lee propelled a fund-raising campaign to buy the airplane and prepared the Geonkukki. The case of North Korea, Kim Il-sung recognized the air power in the course which he comes into the power due to the problem to be reality so that it was low. The recognition about his air power is low to a guerilla experience and restless political topology. But, He received a soldier weapon support since 1949 from the USSR and emphasized the air power. He emphasized the military strength of the army again as soon as a 38th Parallel force collision happened. The North Korea organized the air unit in spite of short time before the Korean War.

Abstract

This research recognize the air power as the key point element of the Korean War, and analyze the war readiness course and the recognition about the Air Forces of North and South Koreas. A subject period of the study distinguishes the Korean War from the rule period of Japan based on the liberation. To strengthen the air power at the rule period of Japan was carried out with the colonization rule and in the method of the war readiness. Japan made many airplane to accomplish the war and made the airport at the Korean Peninsula. Korea was mobilized in this course at an aircraft manufacture and airport construction. Korea had high concern about the air from 1900 and grasped the current situation about the air force of a big power and predicted a future air war. The recognition about the air power of Korea was connected to independent movement. The independence group trained the pilot and applied the air power at independent movement. The air asset and the recognition about the Air Force was utilized for the air force construction which is formed at a rule period of Japan. The Air Force of the Republic of Korea (ROK) after the liberation failed though it tried the receipt of the airplane to be left. But, North Korea took the action such as quick receipt of the airplane and the Sineuiju Air Unit establishment. North Korea began the Korean War from the situation which the air power is superior compared with the ROK finally. The ROK coped with return of the US Forces in Korea and requested the support of active air power in America. The USA emphasized the economy assistance than the soldier assistance of the Air Force about Korea. The USA evaluated the meaning of Korea which is the international politics relatively so that it was low. Especially the USA recognized negatively about the going north unity which the Korean Government insists. The Korean Government propelled an air power increase which is the oneself as soon as an air power enhance requirement about America failed. Syngman Lee propelled a fund-raising campaign to buy the airplane and prepared the Geonkukki. The case of North Korea, Kim Il-sung recognized the air power in the course which he comes into the power due to the problem to be reality so that it was low. The recognition about his air power is low to a guerilla experience and restless political topology. But, He received a soldier weapon support since 1949 from the USSR and emphasized the air power. He emphasized the military strength of the army again as soon as a 38th Parallel force collision happened. The North Korea organized the air unit in spite of short time before the Korean War.

참고문헌 (50)

  1. "서우, 제4호, 1907년 3월 1일; 제8호, 1907년 7월 1일 時報", ~ (1907)
  2. "대한협회회보, 제7호, 1908년 10월 25일", ~ (1908)
  3. "世界將來에 空中生活과 空中戰爭", 서북학회월보, (15) (1909)
  4. "대한흥학보", ~
  5. "한국독립운동사 자료 3(임정편Ⅲ), ?大韓民國 臨時政府 關係 論說類?, 安昌浩의 抗日自主獨立運動에 관한 新年辭 및 演說文", ~
  6. "개벽", ~
  7. "동광", ~
  8. "독립신문", ~
  9. "東亞日報", ~
  10. "삼천리", ~
  11. "朝鮮, 1935年 5月號", ~ (1935)
  12. "每日新報", ~
  13. "조선군참모부 교통운수조사자료 in: 해외한국학자료총서, 6", pp.28~29 (2004), 성균관대학교 동아시아학술원
  14. "東京朝日新聞", ~
  15. "大阪每日新聞, 1935년 10월 27일. 飛行團と一個聯隊 朝鮮會寧に新設", ~ (1935)
  16. 宮田節子, "朝鮮軍槪要史", pp.35~47 (1989), 不二出版
  17. 富永謙吾, "現代史資料, 39; 太平洋戰爭5", pp.100~102 (1975), みすず書房
  18. 秦郁彦, "戰前期日本官僚制の制度·組織·人事", pp.379~380 (1981), 東京大學出版會
  19. "한국독립운동사자료1(임정편Ⅰ), 11. 大韓民國臨時政府 政務報告書(大韓民國二十六年度 政務報告書)", ~
  20. "반민특위조사기록, 신용욱의 부일 及 반민행위죄상, 1949년 3월 31일", ~ (1949)
  21. "서울신문", ~
  22. "조선일보", ~
  23. "대한민국사자료집, 28, 이승만관계서한자료집1(1944~1948)", pp.128~129 (1996), 국사편찬위원회
  24. 국방부, "國防部史, 제1집", pp.417~ (1954)
  25. "FRUS", ~
  26. "평화일보", ~
  27. "한국특사가 국무장관에게? 1948년 11월 5일, FRUS", 956~958 (1948)
  28. "자유신문", ~
  29. "연합신문", ~
  30. Lovell, John P., "The Military and Politics in Postwar Korea ; Korean Politics in Transition", pp.161~ (1975), Washington University Press
  31. "한성일보", ~
  32. "세계일보", ~
  33. 조이현, "1948~1949년 주한미군의 철수와 주한미군사고문단의 활동", 한국사론, 35, pp.268~270 (1996)
  34. "한국에 관한 미국의 입장(NSC 8", 2), 1949년 3월 22일, FRUS, 1949, pp.969~978
  35. "조선중앙일보", ~
  36. "경향신문", ~
  37. "자유민보", ~
  38. "미국 중앙정보국 정보보고서 Daily Report1 in: 한국전쟁 자료총서』 16", pp.16~17
  39. "한국전란 1년지", 98~102 (1951)
  40. "공군사, 제1집", pp.66~ (1962), 공군교재창
  41. "새 조선의 항공대를 창설하자, 김일성전집, 제1권" (1945)
  42. "중앙신문", ~
  43. "평양학원을 창립할 데 대하여, 김일성저작집, 제1권" (1945)
  44. "참다운 인민의 군대, 현대적인 정규군대를 창건하자, 김일성저작집, 제3권" (1947)
  45. "조선민주주의인민공화국 정부의 정강, 김일성저작집, 제4권" (1948)
  46. 정병준, "한국전쟁-38선 충돌과 전쟁의 형성", pp.391~417 (2006), 돌베개
  47. "소련 내각회의 의장과 조선민주주의인민공화국 내각수상의 조소 양국관계의 발전 전망에 관한 회담 기록, 1949년 3월 5일 20시 00분?, 한국전쟁, 문서와 자료, 1950~53년 in: 해외자료총서11", pp.19~21 (2006), 국사편찬위원회
  48. "조선민주주의인민공화국 주재 소련대사가 소련 내각회의 의장에게 보낸 보고, 남북 조선의 정치경제 상황개요, 1949년 9월 15일, 한국전쟁, 문서와 자료, 1950~53년 in: 해외자료총서11", pp.34~47 (2006), 국사편찬위원회
  49. David Tsui, "중공군의 한국전쟁 참전(Ⅱ)", 전략연구, 36, pp.156~ (2006)
  50. "항공대를 확대강화하기 위하여 in: 김일성저작집, 제1권"

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)