본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Evaluation of postoperative complications according to treatment of third molars in mandibular angle fracture

2

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류치의학

초록

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the implication of third molars in postoperative complications of mandibular angle fracture with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF).Materials and Methods: Data were collected on patients who presented with mandibular angle fracture at our Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery between January 2011 and December 2015. Of the 63 total patients who underwent ORIF and perioperative intermaxillary fixation (IMF) with an arch bar, 49 patients were identified as having third molars in the fracture line and were followed up with until plate removal. The complications of postoperative infection, postoperative nerve injury, bone healing, and changes in occlusion and temporomandibular joint were evaluated and analyzed using statistical methods.Results: In total, 49 patients had third molars in the fracture line and underwent ORIF surgery and perioperative IMF with an arch bar. The third molar in the fracture line was retained during ORIF in 39 patients. Several patients complained of nerve injury, temporomandibular disorder (TMD), change of occlusion, and postoperative infection around the retained third molar. The third molars were removed during ORIF surgery in 10 patients. Some of these patients complained of nerve injury, but no other complications, such as TMD, change in occlusion, or postoperative infection, were observed. There was no delayed union or nonunion in either of the groups. No statistically significant difference was found between the non-extraction group and the retained teeth group regarding complications after ORIF.Conclusion: If the third molar is partially impacted or completely nonfunctional, likely to be involved in pathologic conditions later in life, or possible to remove with the plate simultaneously, extraction of the third molar in the fracture line should be considered during ORIF surgery of the mandible angle fracture.

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the implication of third molars in postoperative complications of mandibular angle fracture with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF).Materials and Methods: Data were collected on patients who presented with mandibular angle fracture at our Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery between January 2011 and December 2015. Of the 63 total patients who underwent ORIF and perioperative intermaxillary fixation (IMF) with an arch bar, 49 patients were identified as having third molars in the fracture line and were followed up with until plate removal. The complications of postoperative infection, postoperative nerve injury, bone healing, and changes in occlusion and temporomandibular joint were evaluated and analyzed using statistical methods.Results: In total, 49 patients had third molars in the fracture line and underwent ORIF surgery and perioperative IMF with an arch bar. The third molar in the fracture line was retained during ORIF in 39 patients. Several patients complained of nerve injury, temporomandibular disorder (TMD), change of occlusion, and postoperative infection around the retained third molar. The third molars were removed during ORIF surgery in 10 patients. Some of these patients complained of nerve injury, but no other complications, such as TMD, change in occlusion, or postoperative infection, were observed. There was no delayed union or nonunion in either of the groups. No statistically significant difference was found between the non-extraction group and the retained teeth group regarding complications after ORIF.Conclusion: If the third molar is partially impacted or completely nonfunctional, likely to be involved in pathologic conditions later in life, or possible to remove with the plate simultaneously, extraction of the third molar in the fracture line should be considered during ORIF surgery of the mandible angle fracture.

참고문헌 (16)

  1. Hanson BP, "The association of third molars with mandibular angle fractures: a meta-analysis", J Can Dent Assoc, 70, pp.39~43 (2004)
  2. Al-Moraissi EA, "What method for management of unilateral mandibular angle fractures has the lowest rate of postoperative complications? A systematic review and meta-analysis", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 72, pp.2197~2211 (2014)
  3. Patel N, "A detailed analysis of mandibular angle fractures: epidemiology, patterns, treatments, and outcomes", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 74, pp.1792~1799 (2016)
  4. Rajandram RK, "Mandibular third molar and angle of mandible fractures:an unsolved clinical dilemma", Sains Malaysiana, 42, pp.39~43 (2013)
  5. McNamara Z, "Removal versus retention of asymptomatic third molars in mandibular angle fractures: a randomized controlled trial", Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 45, pp.571~574 (2016)
  6. Yadavalli G, "Clinical evaluation of mandibular angle fractures with teeth in fracture line, treated with stable internal fixation", Indian J Stomatol, 2, pp.216~221 (2011)
  7. Bell RB, "Is the use of arch bars or interdental wire fixation necessary for successful outcomes in the open reduction and internal fixation of mandibular angle fractures?", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 66, pp.2116~2122 (2008)
  8. Fordyce AM, "Intermaxillary fixation is not usually necessary to reduce mandibular fractures", Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 37, pp.52~57 (1999)
  9. Dimitroulis G, "Management of fractured mandibles without the use of intermaxillary wire fixation", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 60, pp.1435~1438 (2002)
  10. Kim MY, "A comparison of three treatment methods for fractures of the mandibular angle", Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 45, pp.878~883 (2016)
  11. Bhagol A, "A textbook of advanced oral and maxillofacial surgery", pp.385~414 (2013), InTech
  12. Ellis E, "Treatment of mandibular angle fractures using two noncompression miniplates", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 52, pp.1032~1036 (1994)
  13. Ellis E 3rd, "Outcomes of patients with teeth in the line of mandibular angle fractures treated with stable internal fixation", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 60, pp.863~865 (2002)
  14. Baltrusaityte A, "Dynamical changes of occlusion and articulation during treatment of mandibular angle fractures", Stomatologija, 15, pp.12~19 (2013)
  15. Pullinger AG, "Trauma history in diagnostic groups of temporomandibular disorders", Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol, 71, pp.529~534 (1991)
  16. Chaurasia NK, "Clinical analysis of changes in function of the temporomandibular joint after open reduction and internal fixation of mandible fracture", Indian J Oral Sci, 6, pp.60~64 (2015)

관련 논문AI추천

Clinical evaluation of mandibular angle fracture김문섭, 김수관, 오지수치의학연구원 · Oral Biology Research2012 · 제36권 제2호Relationship between mandibular condyle and angle fractures and the presence of mandibular third molars김수관, 마득현, 문선용, 오지수, 유재식대한구강악안면외과학회 · 대한구강악안면외과학회지2015 · 제41권 제1호Open reduction and internal fixation with 2.0 mm monocortical miniplate in mandibular fracture: a retrospective study김수관, 김철만, 박현천, 신성민, 양성수, 오지수, 유재식, 임경섭, 정경인치의학연구원 · Oral Biology Research2014 · 제38권 제2호Transbuccal versus transoral approach for management of mandibular angle fractures: a prospective, clinical and radiographic studyHunny Jain, Kiran Savant, Purva Vijay Sinai Khandeparker, Rakshit Vijay Sinai Khandeparker, Vikas Berwal, Vikas Dhupar대한구강악안면외과학회 · 대한구강악안면외과학회지2016 · 제42권 제3호Post-traumatic and postoperative neurosensory deficits of the inferior alveolar nerve in mandibular fracture: a prospective studyAkash Sachdeva, Gurdarshan Singh, Hitesh Chander Mittal, Sunil Yadav, Sunita Malik, Vijaylaxmy Malhotra, Vikas Dhupar대한구강악안면외과학회 · 대한구강악안면외과학회지2016 · 제42권 제5호하악 제3대구치와 하악 우각부 골절과의 상관관계에 대한 연구고승오, 김성일, 박선혜, 신효근, 유준열, 임대호, 최준영대한구강악안면외과학회 · 대한구강악안면외과학회지2009 · 제35권 제6호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)