본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

AIVariant: a deep learning-based somatic variant detector for highly contaminated tumor samples

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

주제분류생화학

초록

The detection of somatic DNA variants in tumor samples with low tumor purity or sequencing depth remains a daunting challenge despite numerous attempts to address this problem. In this study, we constructed a substantially extended set of actual positive variants originating from a wide range of tumor purities and sequencing depths, as well as actual negative variants derived from sequencer-specific sequencing errors. A deep learning model named AIVariant, trained on this extended dataset, outperforms previously reported methods when tested under various tumor purities and sequencing depths, especially low tumor purity and sequencing depth.

Abstract

The detection of somatic DNA variants in tumor samples with low tumor purity or sequencing depth remains a daunting challenge despite numerous attempts to address this problem. In this study, we constructed a substantially extended set of actual positive variants originating from a wide range of tumor purities and sequencing depths, as well as actual negative variants derived from sequencer-specific sequencing errors. A deep learning model named AIVariant, trained on this extended dataset, outperforms previously reported methods when tested under various tumor purities and sequencing depths, especially low tumor purity and sequencing depth.

참고문헌 (28)

  1. Joyce, J. A., "Microenvironmental regulation of metastasis", Nat. Rev. Cancer, 9, pp.239~252 (2009)
  2. Hanahan, D., "Accessories to the crime: functions of cells recruited to the tumor microenvironment", Cancer Cell, 21, pp.309~322 (2012)
  3. Labani-Motlagh, A., "The Tumor microenvironment : a milieu hindering and obstructing antitumor immune responses", Front. Immunol, 11, pp.940~ (2020)
  4. Carter, S. L., "Absolute quantification of somatic DNA alterations in human cancer", Nat. Biotechnol, 30, pp.413~421 (2012)
  5. Aran, D., "Systematic pan-cancer analysis of tumour purity", Nat. Commun, 6, pp.8971~ (2015)
  6. Zheng, X., "Estimating and accounting for tumor purity in the analysis of DNA methylation data from cancer studies", Genome Biol, 18, pp.17~ (2017)
  7. Li, Y., "Putative biomarkers for predicting tumor sample purity based on gene expression data", BMC Genomics, 20, pp.1021~ (2019)
  8. Gordon, L. G., "Estimating the costs of genomic sequencing in cancer control", BMC Health Serv. Res, 20, pp.492~ (2020)
  9. Nakamura, K., "Sequence-specific error profile of Illumina sequencers", Nucleic Acids Res, 39, pp.e90~ (2011)
  10. Schirmer, M., "Insight into biases and sequencing errors for amplicon sequencing with the Illumina MiSeq platform", Nucleic Acids Res, 43, pp.e37~ (2015)
  11. Stoler, N., "Sequencing error profiles of Illumina sequencing instruments", NAR Genom. Bioinform, 3, pp.lqab019~ (2021)
  12. Minoche, A. E., "Evaluation of genomic highthroughput sequencing data generated on Illumina HiSeq and genome analyzer systems", Genome Biol, 12, pp.R112~ (2011)
  13. Tan, G., "Long fragments achieve lower base quality in Illumina paired-end sequencing", Sci. Rep, 9, pp.2856~ (2019)
  14. Treangen, T. J., "Repetitive DNA and next-generation sequencing : computational challenges and solutions", Nat. Rev. Genet, 13, pp.36~46 (2011)
  15. Cibulskis, K., "Sensitive detection of somatic point mutations in impure and heterogeneous cancer samples", Nat. Biotechnol, 31, pp.213~219 (2013)
  16. Kim, S., "Strelka2 : fast and accurate calling of germline and somatic variants", Nat. Methods, 15, pp.591~594 (2018)
  17. Fan, Y., "MuSE : accounting for tumor heterogeneity using a sample-specific error model improves sensitivity and specificity in mutation calling from sequencing data", Genome Biol, 17, pp.178~ (2016)
  18. Koboldt, D. C., "VarScan 2 : somatic mutation and copy number alteration discovery in cancer by exome sequencing", Genome Res, 22, pp.568~576 (2012)
  19. Larson, D. E., "SomaticSniper : identification of somatic point mutations in whole genome sequencing data", Bioinformatics, 28, pp.311~317 (2012)
  20. Sahraeian, S. M. E., "Deep convolutional neural networks for accurate somatic mutation detection", Nat. Commun, 10, pp.1041~ (2019)
  21. Sahraeian, S. M. E., "Achieving robust somatic mutation detection with deep learning models derived from reference data sets of a cancer sample", Genome Biol, 23, pp.12~ (2022)
  22. Eberle, M. A., "A reference data set of 5.4 million phased human variants validated by genetic inheritance from sequencing a three-generation 17-member pedigree", Genome Res, 27, pp.157~164 (2017)
  23. Li, H., "A synthetic-diploid benchmark for accurate variant-calling evaluation", Nat. Methods, 15, pp.595~597 (2018)
  24. The ICGC, "TCGA Pan-Cancer Analysis of Whole Genomes Consortium", Pan-cancer analysis of whole genomes, 2020, pp.578, 82~93
  25. Ewing, A. D., "Combining tumor genome simulation with crowdsourcing to benchmark somatic single-nucleotide-variant detection", Nat. Methods, 12, pp.623~630 (2015)
  26. He, K., "Deep residual learning for image recognition", 2016 IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (CVPR), pp.770~778 (2016)
  27. Vogelstein, B., "Cancer genome landscapes", Science, 339, pp.1546~1558 (2013)
  28. Nik-Zainal, S., "Landscape of somatic mutations in 560 breast cancer wholegenome sequences", Nature, 534, pp.47~54 (2016)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (225건)