Prenatal nursing intervention studies published in Korean nursing journals: a scoping review
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study was to describe prenatal nursing intervention studies on pregnant women and their families published in Korean nursing journals to identify research trends and to analyze the characteristics of intervention studies. This scoping review was conducted using Arksey and O’Malley’s framework. We identified a research question and searched six domestic electronic databases for relevant articles. Forty-five references that met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were finally selected. We extracted the data using an analytic framework, and then collated and summarized the characteristics of the intervention studies. The most frequently used research designs were non-randomized controlled trials (91.1%), and only a few studies applied a specific theoretical framework (24.4%). The participants were mainly pregnant women only (64.4%) during the third trimester (35.6%) of pregnancy. Prenatal education was the most common type of intervention (48.9%), followed by complementary therapy (37.8%) and psychosocial support programs (13.3%). The most commonly used outcome variables were drawn from the psychological domain (44.5%), although distinct types of outcome variables—especially from the psychological and physical domains—were used to measure the effectiveness of different types of prenatal interventions. This review suggests that further prenatal nursing intervention studies in Korea should expand the study participants to include pregnant women’s family members, high-risk and vulnerable groups, and women throughout entire pregnancy. Furthermore, it is necessary to develop integrative prenatal nursing interventions that promote family support and participation by facilitating partnerships among women, families, and nurses before, during, and after pregnancy.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to describe prenatal nursing intervention studies on pregnant women and their families published in Korean nursing journals to identify research trends and to analyze the characteristics of intervention studies. This scoping review was conducted using Arksey and O’Malley’s framework. We identified a research question and searched six domestic electronic databases for relevant articles. Forty-five references that met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were finally selected. We extracted the data using an analytic framework, and then collated and summarized the characteristics of the intervention studies. The most frequently used research designs were non-randomized controlled trials (91.1%), and only a few studies applied a specific theoretical framework (24.4%). The participants were mainly pregnant women only (64.4%) during the third trimester (35.6%) of pregnancy. Prenatal education was the most common type of intervention (48.9%), followed by complementary therapy (37.8%) and psychosocial support programs (13.3%). The most commonly used outcome variables were drawn from the psychological domain (44.5%), although distinct types of outcome variables—especially from the psychological and physical domains—were used to measure the effectiveness of different types of prenatal interventions. This review suggests that further prenatal nursing intervention studies in Korea should expand the study participants to include pregnant women’s family members, high-risk and vulnerable groups, and women throughout entire pregnancy. Furthermore, it is necessary to develop integrative prenatal nursing interventions that promote family support and participation by facilitating partnerships among women, families, and nurses before, during, and after pregnancy.
참고문헌 (29)
- Lee SY, "Prenatal and postnatal care and its policy implications", Health Welf Policy Forum, 236, pp.37~50 (2016)
- Zulfiqar A Bhutta, "Can available interventions end preventable deaths in mothers, newborn babies, and stillbirths, and at what cost?", The Lancet, 384(9940), pp.347~370 (2014), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- World Health Organization, "WHO recommendations on antenatal care for a positive pregnancy experience", pp.172~ (2016), World Health Organization
- Hwang NM, "The necessity for establishing a public prenatal health promotion and education system", Health Welf Policy Forum, 163, pp.50~64 (2010)
- 김미영, "미산부의 산전교육 참여 현황과 분만, 산후관리, 신생아 양육 관련 지식 및 태도", 여성건강간호학회지, 22(3), pp.139~150 (2016), 한국여성건강간호학회[DOI]
- Phyllis Dyess-Nugent, "Nurses’ Unique Opportunity to Promote Patient Engagement in Prenatal Care", Nursing Forum, 53(1), pp.61~68 (2018), Wiley[DOI]
- 배지현, "결혼이주여성의 임신·출산에 관한 국내 연구동향", 한국산학기술학회논문지, 19(3), pp.278~290 (2018), 한국산학기술학회[DOI]
- 김다솜, "취약계층 임산부·어머니·영유아 대상 방문건강관리서비스에 대한 통합적 문헌고찰", Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing, 47(5), pp.577~588 (2017), 한국간호과학회
- 송주은, "국내 모성적응증진 프로그램의 효과에 대한 체계적 문헌고찰", 여성건강간호학회지, 19(3), pp.129~141 (2013), 한국여성건강간호학회
- 송주은, "한국사회 결혼이민여성의 모성적응 관련 양적논문에 대한 체계적 고찰", 여성건강간호학회지, 21(1), pp.55~70 (2015), 한국여성건강간호학회
- Hilary Arksey, "Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework", International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), pp.19~32 (2005), Informa UK Limited[DOI]
- "Korean Journals of Nursing" (2020)[URL]
- Hyun-Ju Seo, "A newly developed tool for classifying study designs in systematic reviews of interventions and exposures showed substantial reliability and validity", Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 70, pp.200~205 (2016), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- 정현서, "임산부 관리를 위한 국내외 분류체계 고찰", 한국모자보건학회지, 23(2), pp.75~83 (2019), 한국모자보건학회[DOI]
- 최명애, "한국간호연구의 동향: 대한간호학회지 및 회원 학회지(창간호부터 2010년까지)에 게재된 논문의 연구동향 분석", Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing, 44(5), pp.484~494 (2014), 한국간호과학회
- Hodnett ED, "Continuous support for women during childbirth", Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 7, pp.CD003766~ (2013)[DOI]
- Lars Plantin, "Positive Health Outcomes of Fathers' Involvment in Pregnancy and Childbirth Paternal Support: A Scope Study Literature Review", Fathering: A Journal of Theory, Research, and Practice about Men as Fathers, 9(1), pp.87~102 (2011), Men's Studies Press, LLC[DOI]
- 정성석, "초산모와 경산모의 모성역할 자신감에 대한 영향요인 비교", Child Health Nursing Research, 17(3), pp.181~189 (2011), 한국아동간호학회
- Lyn S. Chitty, "A model for a new pyramid of prenatal care based on the 11 to 13 weeks' assessment", Prenatal Diagnosis, 31(1), pp.3~6 (2011), Wiley[DOI]
- "The 2018 National Survey on Fertility and Family Health and Welfare" (2019)[URL]
- 왕희정, "고령임부 대상 모바일 웹 기반 임신 건강관리 교육프로그램 효과", Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing, 45(3), pp.337~346 (2015), 한국간호과학회
- S Rising, "Centering Pregnancy An Interdisciplinary Model of Empowerment", Journal of Nurse-Midwifery, 43(1), pp.46~54 (1998), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- Christine J Catling, "Group versus conventional antenatal care for women", Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2015(2), pp.CD007622~ (2015), Wiley[DOI]
- Choe MA, "Perspectives on bionursing science", Perspect Nurs Sci, 9(2), pp.61~70 (2012)
- Pınar Serçekuş, "Effects of antenatal education on fear of childbirth, maternal self-efficacy and parental attachment", Midwifery, 34, pp.166~172 (2016), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- Hannah R. Hall, "Women's use of complementary and alternative medicines during pregnancy: A cross-sectional study", Midwifery, 30(5), pp.499~505 (2014), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- Matthias Kalder, "Use of complementary and alternative medicine during pregnancy and delivery", Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 283(3), pp.475~482 (2011), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
- Lisa Strouss, "Complementary and Alternative Medicine use in women during pregnancy: do their healthcare providers know?", BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 14(1), pp.85~ (2014), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
- Annika Karlström, "The meaning of a very positive birth experience: focus groups discussions with women", BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 15(1), pp.251~ (2015), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]