본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

The Use of Strategies in Interaction of Korean College EFL Learners

2

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

This study aims to explore whether L2 learners more often struggle to obtain comprehensible input from the interlocutor or to make their own output more comprehensible to make communication successful and draw pedagogical implications by examining Korean EFL learners' employment of interactional strategies—both types of strategies for comprehensible input and comprehensible output—in oral communication tasks. The results show that considerably more attention is paid to the generation and modification of their own output than to the perception of input, reflecting the face-threatening nature of negotiation of meaning (Aston, 1986; Foster & Ohta, 2005). In addition, the learners of this study tried to modify morphosyntactic errors in their output whenever they noticed them while the instances of strategies for comprehensible input were mostly limited to meaning negotiation. Suggestions are made on how L2 teachers can respond more effectively to the needs of learners over their interactional process.

Abstract

This study aims to explore whether L2 learners more often struggle to obtain comprehensible input from the interlocutor or to make their own output more comprehensible to make communication successful and draw pedagogical implications by examining Korean EFL learners' employment of interactional strategies—both types of strategies for comprehensible input and comprehensible output—in oral communication tasks. The results show that considerably more attention is paid to the generation and modification of their own output than to the perception of input, reflecting the face-threatening nature of negotiation of meaning (Aston, 1986; Foster & Ohta, 2005). In addition, the learners of this study tried to modify morphosyntactic errors in their output whenever they noticed them while the instances of strategies for comprehensible input were mostly limited to meaning negotiation. Suggestions are made on how L2 teachers can respond more effectively to the needs of learners over their interactional process.

참고문헌 (30)

  1. Aston,G, "Trouble shooting interaction with learners: the more the merrier", Applied Linguistics, 7, pp.128~143 (1986)
  2. Drnyei, Z, "Problem-solving mechanisms in L2 communication", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, pp.349~385 (1998)
  3. Doughty, C, "Communicative focus on form, In Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition", pp.114~138 (1999), Cambridge University Press
  4. Ellis,R, "The study of second language acquisition" (1999), Oxford University Press
  5. Foster, P, "A classroom perspective on the negotiation of meaning", Applied Linguistics, 19, pp.1~23 (1998)
  6. Foster, P, "Negotiation for meaning and peer assistance in second language classrooms", Applied Linguistics, 26, pp.402~430 (2005)
  7. Gass, S. M, "The effect of familiarity on the comprehensibility of nonnative speech", Language Learning, 34, pp.65~89 (1984)
  8. Gass, S. M, "Task variation and nonnative-nonnative negotiation of meaning, In Input in second language acquisition", pp.149~161 (1985), Newbury House
  9. Gass, S. M, "Variation in native speaker speech modification to nonnative speakers", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 7, pp.37~58 (1985)
  10. Gass, S. M, "Input, interaction, and second language production", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, pp.283~302 (1994)
  11. Long,M.H, "Input, interaction, and second language acquisition", pp.1980
  12. Long,M.H, "Input, interaction and second language acquisition", Annals of New York Academy of Science, 379, pp.250~278 (1981)
  13. Long,M.H, "The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition, In Handbook of research on language acquisition: Vol.2. Second language acquisition", pp.413~478 (1996), Academic Press
  14. Loschky,L, "Comprehensible input and second language acquisition: What is the relationship", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, pp.303~323 (1994)
  15. Mackey,A, "Stepping up the place: input, interaction and interlanguage development. An empirical study of questions in ESL", pp.1995
  16. Mackey, A, "How do learners perceive interactional feedback", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, pp.471~497 (2000)
  17. Nobuyoshi, J, "Focused communication tasks and second language acquisition", ELT Journal, 47, pp.203~210 (1993)
  18. Oliver,R, "Negotiation of meaning in child interactions", The Modern Language Journal, 82, pp.372~386 (1998)
  19. Oliver,R., "The patterns of negotiation for meaning in child interactions", The Modern Language Journal, 86, pp.97~111 (2002)
  20. Oliver,R, "How young is too young?: Investigating Negotiation of meaning and feedback in children aged five to seven years, In Multiple perspectives on interaction: Second language research in honor of Susan M. Gass", pp.135~156 (2009), Routledge
  21. Pica,T, "Research on negotiation: What does it reveal about second-language learning conditions, processes, and outcomes", Language Learning, 44, pp.493~527 (1994)
  22. Pica, T, "Input and interaction in the communicative language classroom: A comparison of teacher-fronted and group activities, In Input in second language acquisition", pp.115~132 (1985), Newbury House
  23. Pica T, "Comprehensible output as outcome of linguistic demands on the learner", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11, pp.63~90 (1989)
  24. Schmidt,R.W, "The role of consciousness in second language learning", Applied Linguistics, 11, pp.129~158 (1990)
  25. Schmidt, R. W, "Deconstructing consciousness in search of useful definitions for applied linguistics", AILA Review, 11, pp.11~26 (1994)
  26. foreign language classrooms, In Multiple perspectives on interaction: Second language research in honor of Susan M. Gass, "Interaction research in second", pp.2009, Spada, N
  27. Swain,M, "Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development, In Input in second language acquisition", pp.236~244 (1985), Newbury House
  28. Swain,M, "Three functions of output in second language learning, In For H. G. Widdowson: Principles and practice in the study of language. A festschrift on the occasion of his 60th Birthday", pp.125~144 (1995), Oxford University Press
  29. Swain,M, "The output hypothesis: Theory and research, In Hand book on research in second language teaching and learning", pp.471~484 (2005), Laurence Erlbaum Associates
  30. Swain, M, "Problems in output and the cognitive processes they generate: A step towards second language learning", Applied Linguistics, 16, pp.371~391 (1995)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (14건)