본문 바로가기
KERD
논문

Coping with large litters: management effects on welfare and nursing capacity of the sow

1

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류축산학

초록

A number of management issues can be used as drivers for change in order to improve animal welfare and nursing capacity of the hyperprolific sow. Group housing of sows during gestation is a recommended practice from the perspective of animal welfare. Related health issues include reproductive health and the locomotor system. It appears that management of pregnant sows in groups is challenging for a producer and considerable skill is required. We explored the benefits and challenges of group housing, including feeding issues. Increasing litter size requires additional attention to the mammary gland and its ability to provide sufficient nursing for the growing litter. We discuss the fundamentals of mammary development and the specific challenges related to the hyperprolific sow. We also address challenges with the farrowing environment. It appears that the old-fashioned farrowing crate is not only outdated in terms of welfare from the public’s perspective, but also fails to provide the environment that the sow needs to support her physiology of farrowing, nursing, and maternal behaviour. Studies from our group and others indicate that providing the sow with a loose housing system adequate in space and nesting material, along with reasonable chance for isolation, can be considered as fundamental for successful farrowing of the hyperprolific sow. It has also been shown that management strategies, such as split suckling and cross fostering, are necessary to ensure proper colostrum intake for all piglets born alive in a large litter. We thus conclude that welfare and nursing capacity of the sow can be improved by management. However, current megatrends such as the climate change may change sow management and force the industry to rethink goals of breeding and, for instance, breeding for better resilience may need to be included as goals for the future.

Abstract

A number of management issues can be used as drivers for change in order to improve animal welfare and nursing capacity of the hyperprolific sow. Group housing of sows during gestation is a recommended practice from the perspective of animal welfare. Related health issues include reproductive health and the locomotor system. It appears that management of pregnant sows in groups is challenging for a producer and considerable skill is required. We explored the benefits and challenges of group housing, including feeding issues. Increasing litter size requires additional attention to the mammary gland and its ability to provide sufficient nursing for the growing litter. We discuss the fundamentals of mammary development and the specific challenges related to the hyperprolific sow. We also address challenges with the farrowing environment. It appears that the old-fashioned farrowing crate is not only outdated in terms of welfare from the public’s perspective, but also fails to provide the environment that the sow needs to support her physiology of farrowing, nursing, and maternal behaviour. Studies from our group and others indicate that providing the sow with a loose housing system adequate in space and nesting material, along with reasonable chance for isolation, can be considered as fundamental for successful farrowing of the hyperprolific sow. It has also been shown that management strategies, such as split suckling and cross fostering, are necessary to ensure proper colostrum intake for all piglets born alive in a large litter. We thus conclude that welfare and nursing capacity of the sow can be improved by management. However, current megatrends such as the climate change may change sow management and force the industry to rethink goals of breeding and, for instance, breeding for better resilience may need to be included as goals for the future.

참고문헌 (62)

  1. Bo Algers, "Maternal behavior in pigs", Hormones and Behavior, 52(1), pp.78~85 (2007), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  2. Per Jensen, "Observations on the maternal behaviour of free-ranging domestic pigs", Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 16(2), pp.131~142 (1986), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  3. Olli Peltoniemi, "Reproduction of group-housed sows", Porcine Health Management, 2(1), pp.15~ (2016), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
  4. Dominiek Maes, "Impact of group housing of pregnant sows on health", Porcine Health Management, 2(1), pp.1~7 (2016), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
  5. J. Yun, "Factors affecting piglet mortality during the first 24 h after the onset of parturition in large litters: effects of farrowing housing on behaviour of postpartum sows", Animal, 13(5), pp.1045~1053 (2019), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  6. Oliviero C, "Animal reproduction in veterinary medicine" (2020), IntechOpen
  7. F. A. M. Tuyttens, "Survey among Belgian pig producers about the introduction of group housing systems for gestating sows", Journal of Animal Science, 89(3), pp.845~855 (2011), Oxford University Press (OUP)[DOI]
  8. C Munsterhjelm, "Housing During Early Pregnancy Affects Fertility and Behaviour of Sows", Reproduction in Domestic Animals, 43(5), pp.584~591 (2008), Wiley[DOI]
  9. J Oravainen, "Factors Affecting Fertility in Loosely Housed Sows and Gilts: Vulvar Discharge Syndrome, Environment and Acute-phase Proteins", Reproduction in Domestic Animals, 41(6), pp.549~554 (2006), Wiley[DOI]
  10. V.A. Moustsen, "Relationship between size and age of modern hyper-prolific crossbred sows", Livestock Science, 141(2-3), pp.272~275 (2011), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  11. K.H. Kim, "Effects of Gestational Housing on Reproductive Performance and Behavior of Sows with Different Backfat Thickness", Animal Bioscience, 29(1), pp.142~148 (2016), 아세아·태평양축산학회[DOI]
  12. Karlen GAM, "The welfare of gestating sows in conventional stalls and large groups on deep litter", Appl Anim Behav Sci, 105, pp.87~101 (2007)[DOI]
  13. R.O. Bates, "Sow performance when housed either in groups with electronic sow feeders or stalls", Livestock Production Science, 79(1), pp.29~35 (2003), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  14. Liat Morgan, "Effects of group housing on reproductive performance, lameness, injuries and saliva cortisol in gestating sows", Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 160, pp.10~17 (2018), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  15. S. L. FERKET, "EFFECT OF FORCED EXERCISE DURING GESTATION ON REPRODUCTIVE PERFORMANCE OF SOWS", Canadian Journal of Animal Science, 65(4), pp.851~859 (1985), Canadian Science Publishing[DOI]
  16. Seguin MJ, "Assessment of a group-housing system for gestating sows: effects of space allowance and pen size on the incidence of superficial skin lesions, changes in body condition, and farrowing performance", J Swine Health Prod, 14, pp.89~96 (2006)
  17. KMD Rutherford, "The welfare implications of large litter size in the domestic pig I: biological factors", Animal Welfare, 22(2), pp.199~218 (2013), Universities Federation for Animal Welfare[DOI]
  18. H.A.M. Spoolder, "Gestation group housing of sows", The gestating and lactating sow, pp.47~72 (2015), Wageningen Academic Publishers[DOI]
  19. C. Farmer, "Mammary development", The gestating and lactating sow, pp.193~216 (2015), Wageningen Academic Publishers[DOI]
  20. W.L. Hurley, "Mammary gland growth in the lactating sow", Livestock Production Science, 70(1-2), pp.149~157 (2001), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  21. M. K. VanKlompenberg, "Late gestational hyperprolactinemia accelerates mammary epithelial cell differentiation that leads to increased milk yield1", Journal of Animal Science, 91(3), pp.1102~1111 (2013), Oxford University Press (OUP)[DOI]
  22. Kay‐Uwe Wagner, "Oxytocin and milk removal are required for post‐partum mammary‐gland development", Genes and Function, 1(4), pp.233~244 (1997), Wiley[DOI]
  23. R. Decaluwé, "Changes in back fat thickness during late gestation predict colostrum yield in sows", Animal, 7(12), pp.1999~2007 (2013), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  24. Diane Wischner, "Nest-building behaviour in sows and consequences for pig husbandry", Livestock Science, 124(1-3), pp.1~8 (2009), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  25. 윤진현, "Benefits of Prepartum Nest-building Behaviour on Parturition and Lactation in Sows — A Review", Animal Bioscience, 28(11), pp.1519~1524 (2015), 아세아·태평양축산학회[DOI]
  26. AB Lawrence, "Stress and Parturition in the Pig", Reproduction in Domestic Animals, 32(5), pp.231~236 (1997), Wiley[DOI]
  27. Jinhyeon Yun, "Prepartum nest-building has an impact on postpartum nursing performance and maternal behaviour in early lactating sows", Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 160, pp.31~37 (2014), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  28. H. Castrén, "Preparturient variation in progesterone, prolactin, oxytocin and somatostatin in relation to nest building in sows", Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 38(2), pp.91~102 (1993), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  29. Jarvis S, "Pituitary-adrenal activation in pre-parturient pigs(Sus scrofa)is associated with behavioural restriction due to lack of space rather than nesting substrate", Anim Welf, 11, pp.371~384 (2002)
  30. Zanella AJ, "Brain opioid receptors in relation to stereotypies, inactivity, and housing in sows", Physiol Behav, 59, pp.769~775 (1996)[DOI]
  31. C. Oliviero, "Effect of the environment on the physiology of the sow during late pregnancy, farrowing and early lactation", Animal Reproduction Science, 105(3-4), pp.365~377 (2008), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  32. Yun J, "Nest-building in sows : effects of farrowing housing on hormonal modulation of maternal characteristics", Appl Anim Behav Sci, 148, pp.77~84 (2013)
  33. Boyle LA, "Effect of gestation housing on behaviour and skin lesions of sows in farrowing crates", Appl Anim Behav Sci, 76, pp.119~134 (2002)[DOI]
  34. Karen Thodberg, "Influence of environmental stimuli on nest building and farrowing behaviour in domestic sows", Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 63(2), pp.131~144 (1999), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  35. Yun J, "Effects of prepartum housing environment on abnormal behaviour, the farrowing process, and interactions with circulating oxytocin in sows", Appl Anim Behav Sci, 162, pp.20~25 (2015)
  36. G.M. Cronin, "The effects of providing sawdust to pre-parturient sows in farrowing crates on sow behaviour, the duration of parturition and the occurrence of intra-partum stillborn piglets", Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 36(4), pp.301~315 (1993), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  37. Mette S Herskin, "Influence of environmental stimuli on maternal behaviour related to bonding, reactivity and crushing of piglets in domestic sows", Appl Anim Behav Sci, 58(3-4), pp.241~254 (1998), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  38. Inger Lise Andersen, "Crushing of piglets by the mother sow (Sus scrofa)—purely accidental or a poor mother?", Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 93(3-4), pp.229~243 (2005), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  39. Lene Juul Pedersen, "Early piglet mortality in loose-housed sows related to sow and piglet behaviour and to the progress of parturition", Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 96(3-4), pp.215~232 (2006), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  40. M.A.M. Taverne, "Myometrial Electrical Activity and Plasma Concentrations of Progesterone, Estrogens and Oxytocin during Late Pregnancy and Parturition in the Miniature Pig", Biology of Reproduction, 21(5), pp.1125~1134 (1979), Oxford University Press (OUP)[DOI]
  41. Kerstin Uvnäs-Moberg, "Oxytocin facilitates behavioural, metabolic and physiological adaptations during lactation", Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 72(3), pp.225~234 (2001), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  42. J. Yun, "Farrowing environment has an impact on sow metabolic status and piglet colostrum intake in early lactation", Livestock Science, 163, pp.120~125 (2014), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  43. Kerstin Uvnäs-Moberg, "Oxytocin may mediate the benefits of positive social interaction and emotions", Psychoneuroendocrinology, 23(8), pp.819~835 (1998), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  44. Uvnas-Moberg K, "Oxytocin, ein vermittler von antistress, wohlbefinden, sozialer interaktion, wachstum und heilung", Oxytocin, a mediator of anti-stress, well-being, social interaction, growth and healing, 2005, pp.51, 57~80
  45. Kirsty L. Chidgey, "Sow and piglet behavioral associations in farrowing pens with temporary crating and in farrowing crates", Journal of Veterinary Behavior, 20, pp.91~101 (2017), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  46. Baxter EM, "Sow welfare in the farrowing crate and alternatives", Adv Pig Welf, pp.27~72 (2018)[DOI]
  47. M.L. Pedersen, "Improved udder access prolongs duration of milk letdown and increases piglet weight gain", Livestock Science, 140(1-3), pp.253~261 (2011), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  48. Dannielle Glencorse, "Impact of Non-Confinement Accommodation on Farrowing Performance: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Farrowing Crates Versus Pens", Animals, 9(11), pp.957~ (2019), MDPI AG[DOI]
  49. Jarvis S, "Peri-natal environmental effects on maternal behaviour, pituitary and adrenal activation, and the progress of parturition in the primiparous sow", Anim Welf, 13, pp.171~181 (2004)
  50. Guro Vasdal, "Management routines at the time of farrowing—effects on teat success and postnatal piglet mortality from loose housed sows", Livestock Science, 136(2-3), pp.225~231 (2011), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  51. Emma M. Baxter, "Achieving optimum performance in a loose-housed farrowing system for sows: the effects of space and temperature", Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 169, pp.9~16 (2015), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  52. M. Melišová, "Sow postural changes, responsiveness to piglet screams, and their impact on piglet mortality in pens and crates", Journal of Animal Science, 92(7), pp.3064~3072 (2014), Oxford University Press (OUP)[DOI]
  53. J. Hales, "The effect of temporary confinement of hyperprolific sows in Sow Welfare and Piglet protection pens on sow behaviour and salivary cortisol concentrations", Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 183, pp.19~27 (2016), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  54. Damm BI, "Sow preferences for walls to lean against when lying down", Appl Anim Behav Sci, 99, pp.53~63 (2006)[DOI]
  55. Andersen IL, "Relationship between postnatal piglet mortality, environmental factors and management around farrowing in herds with loose-housed, lactating sows", Acta Agric Scand A Anim Sci, 57, pp.38~45 (2007)[DOI]
  56. EM Baxter, "The welfare implications of large litter size in the domestic pig II: management factors", Animal Welfare, 22(2), pp.219~238 (2013), Universities Federation for Animal Welfare[DOI]
  57. J.T. Sørensen, "Do nurse sows and foster litters have impaired animal welfare? Results from a cross-sectional study in sow herds", Animal, 10(4), pp.681~686 (2016), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  58. Oliviero C, "Management to improve neonate piglet survival", Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Pig Reproduction, pp.203~210 (2013)
  59. Kobek-Kjeldager C, "Effect of litter size, milk replacer and housing on production results of hyper-prolific sows", Animal, 14, pp.824~833 (2020)[DOI]
  60. Jena Alexopoulos, "A Review of Success Factors for Piglet Fostering in Lactation", Animals, 8(3), pp.38~ (2018), MDPI AG[DOI]
  61. Peltoniemi O, "Developments of reproductive management and biotechnology in the pig", Anim Reprod, 16, pp.524~538 (2019)[DOI]
  62. Kemp B, "Recent advances in pig reproduction: focus on impact of genetic selection for female fertility", Reprod Domest Anim, 53, pp.28~36 (2018)[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (20건)