Nivolumab, Pembrolizumab의 임상적 사용 적정성, 유효성 및 안전성 평가
Adequacy, Efficacy and Safety Assessment of Nivolumab and Pembrolizumab
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Background : Nivolumab (NV) and pembrolizumab (PB) are humanized IgG4 anti PD-1 monoclonal antibody that blocks the immune surveillance pathway and reactivates one’s immune system T-cell. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the adequacy of use in the real world, the efficacy of treatment, and the safety of adverse events. Methods : This study included those who received NV or PB at least once January 1, 2016, March 31, 2019. We excluded those unable to evaluate progressive disease (PD) or adverse events after NV or PB administration. Indications and prescribed doses were evaluated for use adequacy. We assessed the time to progression (TTP) as risk factors affecting the progressive disease (PD) and frequency of adverse events as safety evaluation. Results : Subjects were a total of 31 people, and 165 prescriptions were analyzed. The most common indications were non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), melanoma, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and ovarian cancer. The fit rate of the indication was 100%. The average prescribed dose (%) 96.7±8.6% (72.5-108.1) of the approved dose, of which 22 (71%) were the optimal dose, seven were the low dose, and two were the overdose. Median TTP for efficacy evaluation was 84 days (46-136). Age, treatment group, and the prescribed doses were not significantly related to PD. The risk factors of developing PD were the appropriate dosage (%), no immune-related adverse events, and underlying disease. The presence of immune-related adverse events reduced the risk of PD by 0.078-fold (P<0.001). The appropriate dosage increased the risk of PD by 3.83-fold (p=0.018). Among the 230 cases, 18 cases (7.8%) of grade 3 and above adverse events were found. Among them, only one case was the immune-related adverse event. Conclusion : One TTP was outlier and required attention in interpretation. Immune-related adverse events significantly reducing the risk of PD requires further study.
Abstract
Background : Nivolumab (NV) and pembrolizumab (PB) are humanized IgG4 anti PD-1 monoclonal antibody that blocks the immune surveillance pathway and reactivates one’s immune system T-cell. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the adequacy of use in the real world, the efficacy of treatment, and the safety of adverse events. Methods : This study included those who received NV or PB at least once January 1, 2016, March 31, 2019. We excluded those unable to evaluate progressive disease (PD) or adverse events after NV or PB administration. Indications and prescribed doses were evaluated for use adequacy. We assessed the time to progression (TTP) as risk factors affecting the progressive disease (PD) and frequency of adverse events as safety evaluation. Results : Subjects were a total of 31 people, and 165 prescriptions were analyzed. The most common indications were non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), melanoma, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and ovarian cancer. The fit rate of the indication was 100%. The average prescribed dose (%) 96.7±8.6% (72.5-108.1) of the approved dose, of which 22 (71%) were the optimal dose, seven were the low dose, and two were the overdose. Median TTP for efficacy evaluation was 84 days (46-136). Age, treatment group, and the prescribed doses were not significantly related to PD. The risk factors of developing PD were the appropriate dosage (%), no immune-related adverse events, and underlying disease. The presence of immune-related adverse events reduced the risk of PD by 0.078-fold (P<0.001). The appropriate dosage increased the risk of PD by 3.83-fold (p=0.018). Among the 230 cases, 18 cases (7.8%) of grade 3 and above adverse events were found. Among them, only one case was the immune-related adverse event. Conclusion : One TTP was outlier and required attention in interpretation. Immune-related adverse events significantly reducing the risk of PD requires further study.
참고문헌 (11)
- Leora Horn, "Nivolumab Versus Docetaxel in Previously Treated Patients With Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer : Two-Year Outcomes From Two Randomized, Open-Label, Phase III Trials(CheckMate 017and CheckMate 057)", J Clin Oncol, 35(35), pp.3924~3933 (2017)
- Reck M, "Pembrolizumab versus Chemotherapy for PD-L1–Positive Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer", N Engl J Med, 375(19), pp.1823~1833 (2016)
- Neal Ready MD, "Third-Line Nivolumab Monotherapy in Recurrent SC LC : CheckMate 032", Journal of Thoracic Oncology, 14(2), pp.237~244 (2019)
- Escudier B, "CheckMate 025 Randomized Phase 3Study : Outcomes by Key Baseline Factors and Prior Therapy for Nivolumab Versus Everolimus in Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma", Eur Urol, 72(6), pp.962~971 (2017)
- Shitara K, "Pembrolizumab versus paclitaxel for previously treated, advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer (KE YNOTE-061): a randomised, open-label, controlled, phase 3 trial", Lancet, 392(10142), pp.123~133 (2018)
- Thomas Y, "Nivolumab in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma : Sorafenib-experienced Asian cohort analysis", Journal of Hepatology, 71(6), pp.543~552 (2019)
- Varga A, "Pembrolizumab in patients with programmed death ligand 1–positive advanced ovarian cancer : Analysis of KEYNOTE-028", Gynecol Oncol, 152(2), pp.243~250 (2019)
- 엄고혜, "상급종합병원 암센터에서 Nivolumab 사용평가와 치료성과에 미치는 영향인자", 한국임상약학회지, 28(2), pp.88~94 (2018), 한국임상약학회[DOI]
- 이주연, "Nivolumab 약물사용 평가", Presented at: 2016 병원약사대회및 추계국제학술대회 (2016)
- S. E. Yoon, "Real-world data on nivolumab treatment in Asian patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma", Annals of oncology, 29(8), pp.699~ (2018)
- Wacker B, "Correlation between development of rash and efficacy inpatients treated with epidermal growth factor receptor tyro-sine kinase inhibitor erlotinib in two large phase III studies", Clin Cancer Res, 13(13), pp.3913~3921 (2007)
