Education Level Is a Strong Prognosticator in the Subgroup Aged More Than 50 Years Regardless of the Molecular Subtype of Breast Cancer: A Study Based on the Nationwide Korean Breast Cancer Registry Database
2
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose This study investigated the role of the education level (EL) as a prognostic factor for breast cancer and analyzed the relationship between the EL and various confounding factors. Materials and Methods The data for 64,129 primary breast cancer patients from the Korean Breast Cancer Registry were analyzed. The EL was classified into two groups according to the education period; the high EL group ( 12 years) and low EL group (< 12 years). Survival analyses were performed with respect to the overall survival between the two groups. Results A high EL conferred a superior prognosis compared to a low EL in the subgroup aged > 50 years (hazard ratio, 0.626; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.577 to 0.678) but not in the subgroup aged 50 years (hazard ratio, 0.941; 95% CI, 0.865 to 1.024). The EL was a significant independent factor in the subgroup aged > 50 years according to multivariate analyses. The high EL group showed more favorable clinicopathologic features and a higher proportion of patients in this group received lumpectomy, radiation therapy, and endocrine therapy. In the high EL group, a higher proportion of patients received chemotherapy in the subgroups with unfavorable clinicopathologic features. The EL was a significant prognosticator across all molecular subtypes of breast cancer. Conclusion The EL is a strong independent prognostic factor for breast cancer in the subgroup aged > 50 years regardless of the molecular subtype, but not in the subgroup aged 50 years. Favorable clinicopathologic features and active treatments can explain the main causality of the superior prognosis in the high EL group.
Abstract
Purpose This study investigated the role of the education level (EL) as a prognostic factor for breast cancer and analyzed the relationship between the EL and various confounding factors. Materials and Methods The data for 64,129 primary breast cancer patients from the Korean Breast Cancer Registry were analyzed. The EL was classified into two groups according to the education period; the high EL group ( 12 years) and low EL group (< 12 years). Survival analyses were performed with respect to the overall survival between the two groups. Results A high EL conferred a superior prognosis compared to a low EL in the subgroup aged > 50 years (hazard ratio, 0.626; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.577 to 0.678) but not in the subgroup aged 50 years (hazard ratio, 0.941; 95% CI, 0.865 to 1.024). The EL was a significant independent factor in the subgroup aged > 50 years according to multivariate analyses. The high EL group showed more favorable clinicopathologic features and a higher proportion of patients in this group received lumpectomy, radiation therapy, and endocrine therapy. In the high EL group, a higher proportion of patients received chemotherapy in the subgroups with unfavorable clinicopathologic features. The EL was a significant prognosticator across all molecular subtypes of breast cancer. Conclusion The EL is a strong independent prognostic factor for breast cancer in the subgroup aged > 50 years regardless of the molecular subtype, but not in the subgroup aged 50 years. Favorable clinicopathologic features and active treatments can explain the main causality of the superior prognosis in the high EL group.
참고문헌 (29)
- Hussain SK, "Influence of education level on cancer survival in Sweden", Ann Oncol, 19, pp.156~162 (2008)
- Hussain SK, "Influence of education level on breast cancer risk and survival in Sweden between 1990 and 2004", Int J Cancer, 122, pp.165~169 (2008)
- Albano JD, "Cancer mortality in the United States by education level and race", J Natl Cancer Inst, 99, pp.1384~1394 (2007)
- Gajalakshmi CK, "A population-based survival study on female breast cancer in Madras, India", Br J Cancer, 75, pp.771~775 (1997)
- Lund E, "Education and breast cancer mortality : experience from a large Norwegian cohort study", Cancer Causes Control, 2, pp.235~238 (1991)
- Nishi N, "Differences in mortality and incidence for major sites of cancer by education level in a Japanese population", Ann Epidemiol, 18, pp.584~591 (2008)
- Robsahm TE, "Weak associations between sociodemographic factors and breast cancer : possible effects of early detection", Eur J Cancer Prev, 14, pp.7~12 (2005)
- Heck KE, "Socioeconomic status and breast cancer mortality, 1989through 1993 : an analysis of education data from death certificates", Am J Public Health, 87, pp.1218~1222 (1997)
- Steenland K, "All-cause and cause-specific death rates by educational status for two million people in two American Cancer Society cohorts, 1959-1996", Am J Epidemiol, 156, pp.11~21 (2002)
- Kim C, "Is education associated with mortality for breast cancer and cardiovascular disease among black and white women?", Gend Med, 2, pp.13~18 (2005)
- Dano H, "Fertility pattern does not explain social gradient in breast cancer in denmark", Int J Cancer, 111, pp.451~456 (2004)
- 민선영, "The Basic Facts of Korean Breast Cancer in 2013: Results of a Nationwide Survey and Breast Cancer Registry Database", Journal of Breast Cancer, 19(1), pp.1~7 (2016), 한국유방암학회
- Rutqvist LE, "Socioeconomic gradients in clinical stage at presentation and survival among breast cancer patients in the Stockholm area 1977-1997", Int J Cancer, 119, pp.1433~1439 (2006)
- Cella DF, "Socioeconomic status and cancer survival", J Clin Oncol, 9, pp.1500~1509 (1991)
- Herndon JE, "Effect of socioeconomic status as measured by education level on survival in breast cancer clinical trials", Psychooncology, 22, pp.315~323 (2013)
- Mackenbach JP, "Socioeconomic inequalities in mortality among women and among men : an international study", Am J Public Health, 89, pp.1800~1806 (1999)
- Faggiano F, "Cancer mortality by educational level in Italy", Cancer Causes Control, 6, pp.311~320 (1995)
- Dalton SO, "The relation between socioeconomic and demographic factors and tumour stage in women diagnosed with breast cancer in Denmark, 1983-1999", Br J Cancer, 95, pp.653~659 (2006)
- Gordon NH, "Association of education and income with estrogen receptor status in primary breast cancer", Am J Epidemiol, 142, pp.796~803 (1995)
- Griggs JJ, "Effect of patient socioeconomic status and body mass index on the quality of breast cancer adjuvant chemotherapy", J Clin Oncol, 25, pp.277~284 (2007)
- Bouchardy C, "Social class is an important and independent prognostic factor of breast cancer mortality", Int J Cancer, 119, pp.1145~1151 (2006)
- Damiani G, "The impact of level of education on adherence to breast and cervical cancer screening : Evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis", Prev Med, 81, pp.281~289 (2015)
- Yu XQ, "Socioeconomic disparities in breast cancer survival : relation to stage at diagnosis, treatment and race", BMC Cancer, 9, pp.364~ (2009)
- Louwman WJ, "Impact of a programme of mass mammography screening for breast cancer on socio-economic variation in survival : a population-based study", Breast Cancer Res Treat, 105, pp.369~375 (2007)
- Baquet CR, "Socioeconomic factors and breast carcinoma in multicultural women", Cancer, 88, pp.1256~1264 (2000)
- Patterson RE, "Physical activity, diet, adiposity and female breast cancer prognosis : a review of the epidemiologic literature", Maturitas, 66, pp.5~15 (2010)
- Hellmann SS, "Modifiable risk factors and survival in women diagnosed with primary breast cancer : results from a prospective cohort study", Eur J Cancer Prev, 19, pp.366~373 (2010)
- Reynolds P, "Passive smoking and risk of breast cancer in the California teachers study", Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 18, pp.3389~3398 (2009)
- McDonald PA, "Breast cancer survival in African American women: is alcohol consumption a prognostic indicator?", Cancer Causes Control, 13, pp.543~549 (2002)