본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Risk and Characteristics of Postcolonoscopy Interval Colorectal Cancer after a Positive Fecal Test: A Nationwide Population-Based Study in Korea

1

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류의학일반

초록

Purpose Fecal tests remain a mainstay of population-based colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programs worldwide. However, data on interval CRC (iCRC) arising after follow-up colonoscopy of a positive fecal test are scarce. We conducted a nationwide population-based study to reveal the risk and characteristics of iCRC in this setting. Materials and Methods We searched the National Cancer Screening Program for CRC database in Korea (2005- 2010). Incidence of iCRC within the program was estimated, then Cox proportional-hazards regression analysis was performed to determine the independent predictors of iCRC. The clinical characteristics of iCRC were compared with screen-detected CRC (sCRC). Results We identified 280 iCRC among 150,660 negative colonoscopies as a follow-up exam to a positive fecal immunochemical test (FIT), and 2,427 sCRC. The overall incidence of iCRC was 0.49/1,000 person-years (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.48 to 0.51). iCRC was more likely to occur in men (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.79; 95% CI, 1.39 to 2.30) and elderly patients (aHR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.38 to 2.28 in 65-74 years; aHR, 3.13, 95% CI, 2.13 to 4.60 in ! 75 years). The National Quality Improvement Program for colonoscopy reduced a shortterm risk of iCRC (aHR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.27 to 0.87). Compared with sCRC, iCRC was more likely to occur in the proximal colon, be diagnosed at the localized stage, and have a lower CRC mortality (32.7 vs. 17.4%, 56.8 vs. 34.1%, and 12.5 vs. 17.7%, respectively; all p < 0.05). Conclusion In a population-based CRC screening program with FIT, the burden of iCRC after follow-up colonoscopy was substantial. Men and elderly patients possess a significantly higher risk of iCRC.

Abstract

Purpose Fecal tests remain a mainstay of population-based colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programs worldwide. However, data on interval CRC (iCRC) arising after follow-up colonoscopy of a positive fecal test are scarce. We conducted a nationwide population-based study to reveal the risk and characteristics of iCRC in this setting. Materials and Methods We searched the National Cancer Screening Program for CRC database in Korea (2005- 2010). Incidence of iCRC within the program was estimated, then Cox proportional-hazards regression analysis was performed to determine the independent predictors of iCRC. The clinical characteristics of iCRC were compared with screen-detected CRC (sCRC). Results We identified 280 iCRC among 150,660 negative colonoscopies as a follow-up exam to a positive fecal immunochemical test (FIT), and 2,427 sCRC. The overall incidence of iCRC was 0.49/1,000 person-years (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.48 to 0.51). iCRC was more likely to occur in men (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.79; 95% CI, 1.39 to 2.30) and elderly patients (aHR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.38 to 2.28 in 65-74 years; aHR, 3.13, 95% CI, 2.13 to 4.60 in ! 75 years). The National Quality Improvement Program for colonoscopy reduced a shortterm risk of iCRC (aHR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.27 to 0.87). Compared with sCRC, iCRC was more likely to occur in the proximal colon, be diagnosed at the localized stage, and have a lower CRC mortality (32.7 vs. 17.4%, 56.8 vs. 34.1%, and 12.5 vs. 17.7%, respectively; all p < 0.05). Conclusion In a population-based CRC screening program with FIT, the burden of iCRC after follow-up colonoscopy was substantial. Men and elderly patients possess a significantly higher risk of iCRC.

참고문헌 (30)

  1. Ferlay J, "Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012", Int J Cancer, 136, pp.E359~E386 (2015)[DOI]
  2. Schreuders EH, "Colorectal cancer screening: a global overview of existing programmes", Gut, 64, pp.1637~1649 (2015)[DOI]
  3. Moss S, "European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis. First edition: evaluation and interpretation of screening outcomes", Endoscopy, 44(Suppl 3), pp.SE49~SE64 (2012)[DOI]
  4. Corley DA, "Adenoma detection rate and risk of colorectal cancer and death", N Engl J Med, 370, pp.1298~1306 (2014)[DOI]
  5. Kaminski MF, "Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer", N Engl J Med, 362, pp.1795~1803 (2010)[DOI]
  6. Singh S, "Prevalence, risk factors, and outcomes of interval colorectal cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis", Am J Gastroenterol, 109, pp.1375~1389 (2014)[DOI]
  7. Robertson DJ, "Colorectal cancers soon after colonoscopy: a pooled multicohort analysis", Gut, 63, pp.949~956 (2014)[DOI]
  8. le Clercq CM, "Postcolonoscopy colorectal cancers are preventable: a population-based study", Gut, 63, pp.957~963 (2014)[DOI]
  9. Cooper GS, "Prevalence and predictors of interval colorectal cancers in medicare beneficiaries", Cancer, 118, pp.3044~3052 (2012)[DOI]
  10. Baxter NN, "Analysis of administrative data finds endoscopist quality measures associated with postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer", Gastroenterology, 140, pp.65~72 (2011)[DOI]
  11. Singh H, "Rate and predictors of early", missed colorectal cancers after colonoscopy in Manitoba: a population-based study, 2010, pp.105, 2588~2596
  12. Singh H, "Predictors of colorectal cancer after negative colonoscopy: a population-based study", Am J Gastroenterol, 105, pp.663~673 (2010)[DOI]
  13. 정규원, "Cancer Statistics in Korea: Incidence, Mortality, Survival, and Prevalence in 2012", Cancer Research and Treatment, 47(2), pp.127~141 (2015), 대한암학회[DOI]
  14. 신정임, "Results of Colorectal Cancer Screening of the National Cancer Screening Program in Korea, 2008", Cancer Research and Treatment, 42(4), pp.191~198 (2010), 대한암학회
  15. Choi KS, "Effect of endoscopy screening on stage at gastric cancer diagnosis: results of the National Cancer Screening Programme in Korea", Br J Cancer, 112, pp.608~612 (2015)[DOI]
  16. Shin A, "Validity of fecal occult blood test in the national cancer screening program, Korea", PLoS One, 8, pp.e79292~ (2013)[DOI]
  17. Hai-Rim Shin, "Nationwide Cancer Incidence in Korea, 1999~2001; First Result Using the National Cancer Incidence Database", Cancer Research and Treatment, 37(6), pp.325~331 (2005), 대한암학회
  18. Fritz A, "International classification of diseases for oncology (ICD-O). 3rd ed." (2000)
  19. Young JL Jr, "SEER summary staging manual 2000: codes and coding instructions" (2001)
  20. Pabby A, "Analysis of colorectal cancer occurrence during surveillance colonoscopy in the dietary Polyp Prevention Trial", Gastrointest Endosc, 61, pp.385~391 (2005)[DOI]
  21. Sanduleanu S, "Definition and taxonomy of interval colorectal cancers: a proposal for standardising nomenclature", Gut, 64, pp.1257~1267 (2015)[DOI]
  22. Bressler B, "Rates of new or missed colorectal cancers after colonoscopy and their risk factors: a population-based analysis", Gastroenterology, 132, pp.96~102 (2007)[DOI]
  23. Chiu SY, "Faecal haemoglobin concentration influences risk prediction of interval cancers resulting from inadequate colonoscopy quality: analysis of the Taiwanese Nationwide Colorectal Cancer Screening Program", Gut, 66, pp.293~300 (2017)[DOI]
  24. Rondagh EJ, "Endoscopic appearance of proximal colorectal neoplasms and potential implications for colonoscopy in cancer prevention", Gastrointest Endosc, 75, pp.1218~1225 (2012)[DOI]
  25. Brenner H, "Does a negative screening colonoscopy ever need to be repeated?", Gut, 55, pp.1145~1150 (2006)
  26. 신애선, "Increasing Trend of Colorectal Cancer Incidence in Korea, 1999-2009", Cancer Research and Treatment, 44(4), pp.219~226 (2012), 대한암학회[DOI]
  27. Murphy G, "Sex disparities in colorectal cancer incidence by anatomic subsite, race and age", Int J Cancer, 128, pp.1668~1675 (2011)[DOI]
  28. Wu X, "Subsite-specific colorectal cancer incidence rates and stage distributions among Asians and Pacific Islanders in the United States, 1995 to 1999", Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 13, pp.1215~1222 (2004)
  29. Allison JE, "Screening for colorectal neoplasms with new fecal occult blood tests: update on performance characteristics", J Natl Cancer Inst, 99, pp.1462~1470 (2007)[DOI]
  30. 차재명, "Endoscopist Specialty Is Associated with High-Quality Endoscopy in Korea", Yonsei Medical Journal, 53(2), pp.310~317 (2012), 연세대학교의과대학

관련 논문AI추천

Risk of colorectal cancer in patients with positive results of fecal immunochemical test performed within 5 years since the last colonoscopy이진희, Chang Mo Moon, Yoon Suk Jung대한내과학회 · The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine2021 · 제36권 제5호Quality Metrics of a Fecal Immunochemical Test-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Program in Korea신현필, 이정일, 전정원, Dae Ho Kim, Jae Myung Cha, Jin Young Yoon, Kwang Ro Joo, Min Seob Kwak, Young-Hak Cho거트앤리버 소화기연관학회협의회 · Gut and Liver2018 · 제12권 제2호Association between Endoscopist Volume and Interval Cancers after Colonoscopy: Results from the National Colorectal Cancer Screening Program in Korea김동준, 김성주, 김지은, 서민아, 윤난희, 이선화, 이후연, 전재관대한암학회 · Cancer Research and Treatment2024 · 제56권 제4호Frequency and Characteristics of Interval Colorectal Cancer in Actual Clinical Practice: A KASID Multicenter Study박영숙, Bum Jae Lee, Hyuk Yoon, Jong Ha Park, Jun Lee, Kyeong Ok Kim, Kyu Chan Huh, Sang Wook Kim, Sung Pil Hong, Won Hee Kim, Yeon Soo Kim거트앤리버 소화기연관학회협의회 · Gut and Liver2018 · 제12권 제5호Positive fecal immunochemical test results are associated with non-colorectal cancer mortality문창모, 이진희, Yoon Suk Jung대한내과학회 · The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine2022 · 제37권 제2호A Combination of Fecal Immunochemical Test Results and Iron Deficiency Anemia for Detection of Advanced Colorectal Neoplasia in Asymptomatic Men김남희, 박동일, 박정호, 손정일, 이미연, 정윤숙, 최규용연세대학교의과대학 · Yonsei Medical Journal2017 · 제58권 제5호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (29건)